What's new

Australia and Indonesia voice 'serious concerns' about South China Sea

DavidsSling

BANNED
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
829
Reaction score
0
Country
Israel
Location
Australia
Australia and Indonesia have jointly declared "serious concerns" about the state of the South China Sea, issuing a warning about China's militarisation of the contested waters and urging adherence to international law.

The joint statement from the Australian and Indonesian governments – released following the annual meeting of the countries' defence and foreign ministers – underscores ongoing regional anxiety about the Chinese government's efforts to consolidate its claims in the disputed sea.

c3db611bc2cf6f17cafcab017828921d1c963142

Australian and Indonesian ministers Linda Reynolds, Marise Payne, Retno Marsudi and Prabowo Subianto met in Denpasar on Friday. CREDIT:AP

"The ministers expressed serious concerns about developments in the South China Sea and reaffirmed the importance of maintaining peace, security and stability, and freedom of navigation and overflight in the region," the statement said.

It outlined "concern at the continued militarisation of disputed features" and called for claimants to avoid actions that risked escalating tensions.

The ministers also said a South China Sea code of conduct – the subject of years of discussions between China and the Association of south-east Asian Nations (ASEAN) – must be "substantive", consistent with international law and "not prejudice the interests of third parties".

China, which controversially claims a vast swathe of the South China Sea as its territory, reportedly does not want any code to be subject to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and wants to curb the United States' involvement in the region.

In 2016, an international tribunal established under UNCLOS ruled against China in a dispute with the Philippines over the two countries' claims. China has ignored the finding and pursued a program of land reclamation and militarisation of disputed features.

During their meeting in Denpasar on Friday, Australian ministers Marise Payne and Linda Reynolds, and Indonesian ministers Retno Marsudi and Prabowo Subianto discussed the regional dispute as one of their key issues.

The joint statement said ministers had noted Australia's and Indonesia's strategic outlooks were "converging" in an increasingly contested region.

"They emphasised our two countries' shared interest in an Indo-Pacific region that is open, inclusive and prosperous, and where countries adhere to international law and other agreed rules and norms," the statement read.

Ben Bland, director of the south-east Asia program at the Lowy Institute, said Indonesia, like other countries in the region, was "increasingly concerned by China's assertiveness" in the South China Sea.

5aaa17adf80e6dc22662da7ea8f367059fc4bbc2

A man-made Chinese airstrip in the heavily contested South China Sea.CREDIT:AP

"But it remains reluctant to upset Beijing and wants to be seen as an independent 'honest broker' rather than appearing to 'gang up' on China," he said.

While Indonesia is not a claimant in the South China Sea, the country's Natuna Islands sit at the southern edge of the waters claimed by China and the area has been a source of tension between Jakarta and Beijing.

The Indonesian and Australian ministers also discussed plans for joint deployment of peacekeepers to future conflict zones, with Senator Reynolds calling the development "very exciting".

Mr Bland said the meeting underlined a "steady maturation" of Australia-Indonesia relations.

"Both countries now need to capitalise on this by thickening economic, military and political ties, while developing more mutual understanding to deal with the inevitable hiccups that arise in neighbourly relations," he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/...ns-about-south-china-sea-20191207-p53hst.html
 
.
Both countries have no interest in SCS. They should mind their own business. Australia's survival nowadays depend more and more on China. As US pulls out of international arena, Australia will most likely have to see itself as an Asian country.
 
.
Both countries have no interest in SCS. They should mind their own business. Australia's survival nowadays depend more and more on China. As US pulls out of international arena, Australia will most likely have to see itself as an Asian country.

Maybe you should look more closely at a map. Indonesia has islands within the S China Sea, they have legitimate interests there.
 
. . .
Both countries have no interest in SCS. They should mind their own business. Australia's survival nowadays depend more and more on China. As US pulls out of international arena, Australia will most likely have to see itself as an Asian country.

You do understand what does it mean by South China Sea? Right? South China Sea border South Pacific, in fact, some may even consider South China sea a part of Pacific Ocean.

Australia and Indonesia do have legitimate concern on issue over South China Seas, in fact China is claim some island currently own by Indonesia. So do tell me why both country have no interest in SCS?

And on top of that, your own word contradict yourself. If and when US pull out of international arena (Which I found that of a funny notion) and Australia would see itself as an Asian Country, then would that mean they have MORE concern as an Asian country than as a country in the South Pacific?
 
.
You do understand what does it mean by South China Sea? Right? South China Sea border South Pacific, in fact, some may even consider South China sea a part of Pacific Ocean.

Australia and Indonesia do have legitimate concern on issue over South China Seas, in fact China is claim some island currently own by Indonesia. So do tell me why both country have no interest in SCS?

And on top of that, your own word contradict yourself. If and when US pull out of international arena (Which I found that of a funny notion) and Australia would see itself as an Asian Country, then would that mean they have MORE concern as an Asian country than as a country in the South Pacific?
That's why I said Aus has to be on good terms with China unless we have an alternative but US being isolasionist every year and India being a circus of a country, sadly there's no alternative other than sucking up to CCP.
 
.
That's why I said Aus has to be on good terms with China unless we have an alternative but US being isolasionist every year and India being a circus of a country, sadly there's no alternative other than sucking up to CCP.

Why any one have to suck up for anyone, that is the question.

Each country operate on their own, operate within their own border. That should be how this operate. And in this sense, the US is not the one that being isolationist, as US have no stakes in this, China on the other hand, are becoming one by forcing itself into the Area which they don't belong.

You also seriously underestimate the pull US still got in the region. At the same time seriously overestimate Chinese own.
 
.
Why any one have to suck up for anyone, that is the question.

Each country operate on their own, operate within their own border. That should be how this operate. And in this sense, the US is not the one that being isolationist, as US have no stakes in this, China on the other hand, are becoming one by forcing itself into the Area which they don't belong.

You also seriously underestimate the pull US still got in the region. At the same time seriously overestimate Chinese own.
I am not a fan of CCP and not advocating sucking up to it. I am being realistic. Maybe all smaller countries threatened by China should form a union like NATO.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom