What's new

'Aurat March' and the Neo-Colonial Agenda in Pakistan

Desert Fox

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
10,584
Reaction score
30
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
I believe this is the third year in a row that we're having this so called 'Aurat March' in Pakistan, and there are a couple of noteworthy points that i believe everyone should take into account regarding this movement.

1) No movement of this scale with this kind of coordination we are seeing can survive without some kind of directives and funding to organize and direct it towards an agenda. Therefore, who is funding this 'aurat march'?

2) Why is the media providing them so much publicity? That too sympathetic publicity? For example the recent back and forth between Khalil ur Rehman and Marvi Sirmed; it was obvious Sirmed was the aggressor yet she gets off scott free whereas the former receives the brunt of attacks from media establishment despite majority of Pakistanis sympathizing with him in this instance, where even though his language was detestable the aggressor was clearly the feminist. Does this not show a media agenda which is opposed to the sentiments of majority Pakistanis?

3) What is the agenda of the proponents of this 'aurat march'? They claim to be proponents of "womens rights", something which they have failed to define and how it even applies to the majority of Pakistani women when most of these Feminists are upper class pampered Liberal women who are more likely than not projecting their own bad experiences in extramarital affairs with similar minded Liberal, irreligious, non-committal men looking to simply 'pump N dump' these Liberal women, who then trash the very conservative norms of majority of Pakistani society; norms which have their basis in Islamic values like male guardianship of female relatives against predatory and exploitive men.

4) Every movement is characterized by its slogans which summarize its essence, which in this 'aurat marchs'' case is basically "tu keray to stud, mein kerroon to slut", "taangein khol ke bethoon gi, kya ker lo ge?", "khana khud garam ker lo" and "mera jism meri merzi", among other ludicrous slogans. How exactly does this relate to genuine cases of abuse of women (which Islam already fights against and is the basis for the moral guide of the people of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, but which the state has failed to uphold) within the Pakistani context? I don't think anyone here doubts that the last thing on the mind of an acid attack victim in some rural part of Pakistan is "tangein khol ke bhetna" in a public place, if it even is to begin with.


Copy-Paste Neo-Colonial Feminist Stooges

Rather, all these slogans are not even relevant to the Pakistani context.

Slogans like "Mera jism meri merzi" are direct copy-paste Google-translate versions of American feminist slogan 'my body my choice' which became popularized during the 2016-2018 period due to sexual allegations and obscene remarks of men like Donald Trump and Harvey Weinstein, among other super Liberal, Hollywood affiliated Western Elites; the exact types that these Pakistani neo-colonial Feminist stooges share their common hatred of Islam and its conservative values with; Islamic values like male guardianship over females against predatory men; the exact thing that would protect women from men who only desire to use and abuse them. If anyone would like to contest this statement then the onus is on them to prove where in the example of the blessed Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) they can find a case for the contrary?

My body meri merzi.png

But there is a common denominator here; men like Donald Trump and Harvey Weinstein, who I'm sure have their counterparts in Pakistani society, and women like Pakistani Liberals/Feminists have a common ground; all three have a raging hatred for Islam and the healthy conservative traditional values it teaches; the former because it will prevent them from exploiting vulnerable women; the latter because they suffer severe inferiority complex vis a vis the former and when they get used-and-abused by their Liberal male counterparts (since religious & conservative men wouldn't touch these women) they direct their anger towards rest of society and its traditional values as they themselves have utterly failed in forming healthy relationships.



The End Result of 'Aurat March' Agenda

Will the agenda of the proponents of this 'aurat march' really lead to the Feminist utopia they claim it will bring to the Pakistani women?

Well, let's look at the lands in which this phenomena has already come to pass and from where Pakistani upper class pampered Feminists get their inspiration, namely the West:

1) Womens 'Sexual Liberation': With the removal of male guardianship and the free-choice to sleep around with as many sexual partners as she likes, today the average western woman not only has to contend with numerous sexually transmitted diseases and sexual exploitation by predatory males, but also the bleak future of putting her body through the wear-&-tear of multiple abortions, drug abuse and single parenthood should she decide to go through with her pregnancy.

2) "Free" Sex = Fatherless Children = Increase in Crime Rate: Children born to single mothers as a result of sleeping with multiple men, tend to experience higher rates of sexual abuse by the mothers numerous sexual partners, suffer from higher rates of mental health problems, suffer from lack of self confidence, have higher propensity for violence towards others, higher rate of suicide, higher rate of discontinuing education, higher rate of early sexual involvement, higher rate of drug use and addiction [Source Link] , etc. etc. the list is endless!! Knowing ones lineage and the presence of both biological parents in a child's life has shown to be very critical in child mental-health development which plays crucial role for emotional intelligence and social interaction.

3) Corporate wage-slavery: after having devoted the most fertile years of their lives pursuing careers, enriching the corporate executive bosses and being milked for taxes by the state bureaucracy like cows in a farm; these women exhaust themselves serving as economic cogs in a cut-throat system of competition; once the rust of infertility and old age kicks in and the biological reality hits like a brick wall that men and women really aren't the same, these women are tossed aside by the same cold ruthless corporate system they devoted their youthful years to serving, only to be replaced by a new batch of cogs for the corporate machinery as if they aren't humans but rather disposable components. When they could have spent these same years devoted to a family of their own; a family that would have provided them with comfort and security in their old age. Growing number of women having gone through this cycle are now expressing their regret now that they can't get married, or even if they have gotten married they can no longer conceive children.

The agenda of the 'aurat march' is clear as daylight; to undermine and destroy the already fragile social fabric of Pakistani society by attacking the family and turning men and women against each other where the majority of members of either gender don't actually fall under the category of the inter-gender war the Liberal neo-colonial chamchays of our society wish to import from abroad.


The Feminist Hypocrisy

There is a major problem of oppression and cruelty in Pakistani society, and its not women who are the sole victims of this oppression because if that was the case than this oppression would be equally distributed to all the women across the socioeconomic spectrum of Pakistani society.

The rich, pampered westernized Feminist aunty is not experiencing the same level of oppression that she is inflicting on the under-age village-girl servant who she uses to warm her food as she herself hypocritically taunts men with slogans like "khana khud garam ker lo".

The problem of Pakistani society is the rich and affluent oppressing their own countrymen & women; the wealthy exploiting the poor; the Feminist aunties beating their own underage female servants to death while crying about the "evil patriarchy oppressing women" on the internet.

There is no evil "patriarchy"; yes, there is evil, but men aren't the only ones holding the reins of this evil; so too are women holding these reins, and their victims are the weak and powerless men, women and children.





@Itachi @OsmanAli98 @LeGenD @Psychic @StormBreaker
 
Aurat March is funded by Open Societies Foundation of Jewish billionaire George Soros.
The colonialists physically left; but they left their stooges behind to subjugate the "brown savages" for them.

"If we want to destroy the structure of Algerian society, its capacity for resistance, we must first of all conquer the women; we must go and find them behind the veil where they hide themselves and in the houses where the men keep them out of sight."- French Colonialist Strategy to undermine Algerian cultural resistance to ideological and cultural colonialism [Source]
 
Aurat March is funded by Open Societies Foundation of Jewish billionaire George Soros.

The Ugly Face Of Feminism

By Philip Jones
7-28-9
Was this really what feminism was all about? According to Home Office statistics, to be published later this week, crimes committed by girls aged between ten and 17 have shot up by some 25 per cent over a three-year period.

Earlier this year, a man died and a young woman was badly injured in an explosion in North London. It was thought to have been carried out by a girl gang which had previously been seen causing trouble in the street.

For several years, there has been a disturbing rise in the number of girls committing violent crimes at ever younger ages.

Last month, rival girl gangs used snooker balls in socks to batter each other in a mass brawl at a railway station at Shoreham, West Sussex. In March, a 15-year-old girl was jailed for using a mobile phone to film two drunken teenage male friends beating a man to death in Keighley, West Yorkshire.
Last October, a gang of teenage girls stoned a 72-year-old woman and forced her into a busy road, leaving her with a broken nose and two black eyes.

There has also been a string of murders committed by girls, often sickeningly sadistic. In 1999, for example, two 15-year-old girls murdered 71-year-old Lily Lilley, binding her mouth so tightly that her false teeth were pushed down her throat and giggling as they wheeled her body through the streets before throwing it into a canal.

In the same year, a girl gang was found guilty of murdering mentally-ill Angela Pearce after torturing her. And so on.
Of course, most girls live law-abiding lives. Nevertheless, it is highly disturbing that so many are now committing such acts of savagery.

What would once have been regarded as an aberration among a sex which was once (doubtless a touch misleadingly) a by-word for gentleness, order and self-discipline, has now become a shocking fact of life. So just what has gone wrong with girls?

Certainly, this has to be set in the context of rising crime in general. Only last weekend, a 16-year-old altar boy was killed when a fight broke out in a South London bakery shop, bringing the toll of teenagers killed in London so far this year to 13.

The UK Government's claim that overall crime is falling, as recent statistics also reportedly show, bears scant relation to everyday life. Such figures - even in the supposedly authoritative British Crime Survey - are highly selective or manipulated.

The reality is that crime and disorder are rampant, along with a constant level of menace in many areas from people often fuelled by alcohol or drugs and whose aggression and hostility simmer just below the surface.

The reason for this parlous state of affairs lies in a combination of a collapse of family life and parenthood, depriving children of the love, security and discipline that are crucial in producing orderliness from within, and a parallel collapse in the willingness of the criminal justice system to impose orderliness from without.

On top of all this, however, modern feminism has added an extra and unforeseen twist. Little did those pioneers who fought for equal rights for women dream that one outcome would be equal wrongs by women. Yet that is precisely what has happened.
This is because, like the rest of the equality agenda, modern feminism recast equal rights as 'identicality'. The notion that men and women behaved differently because they had different expectations and pressures was deemed to be sexist and discriminatory. Equality meant that men and women had to lead identical lives.

At the same time, however, feminism also held that masculinity was a problem. It was men, alone, who were held to be aggressive - crime was presented as intrinsically a male problem - as well as being emotionally illiterate and unfairly hogging the workplace, while women were chained to kitchen sink and family.
As a result of the feminist revolution, women have commandeered the freedoms and entitlements of the masculine world - while men themselves have now been largely reduced to sperm banks, walking wallets and occasional au pairs.

Women now claim to be equal breadwinners - but some of them will still go to court to fleece men for everything they have if their marriages break up.
Along with this has come an aggressive and self-centred approach to the world which apes the worst caricatures of male behaviour.

Whereas men were once associated with one-night stands, now women demand sex without strings and bring children into the world without a father as their 'human right'. Told to be assertive, they have interpreted that as being aggressive. Female role models in movies, video games or rap music increasingly glorify violence too.

The outcome has been serious confusion among girls about their role in the world and how they should behave.

In the past, girls' perception of where their interests lay meant curbing their own behaviour in order to attract men and safeguard the well-being of any children they might have.

But now they are told they can go it alone and have it all. So the brakes on their behaviour have been taken off. Assuming that to be equal means competing with boys on their own terms, girls try to prove themselves to be 'one of the lads' by drinking and drug-taking.

The number of women arrested for being drunk and disorderly has leapt tenfold over the past five years. And from alcohol and drugs, violent crime results as surely as night follows day. The original 19th-century feminist pioneers, who fought for women's rights in a society where they really were second-class citizens, would surely have been appalled without measure had they been able to see into the future.

For their feminism was based on the belief that women were different from men - and worthier than them. Indeed, they wanted women to play an equal role in the public sphere precisely because they believed that women's superior moral virtues - sobriety, chastity, self-discipline - would civilise public life.
Instead, just look at what we have done with their great legacy. Bob Geldof's 19-year-old daughter Peaches has been reportedly filmed buying cocaine from a drug-dealer.

Photographs of Mick Jagger's grandchildren published last weekend showed 12-year-old Amba clad in four-inch heels and a microdress posing with a sultry come-hither look at the camera; while her sister Assisi, at the ripe old age of 15, wore a skimpy little satin number and a knowing smile.

Even the likely future wife of Prince William, Kate Middleton, appears to spend half her life downing 'Crack Daddy' vodka and champagne cocktails at Boujis nightclub.

The solution to our crime problem must involve a 'zero tolerance' approach by the police. The instincts of London's new Mayor, Boris Johnson, in outlawing alcohol from public transport and appointing apostles of this approach as his advisers, are admirable.

But we must have the same approach towards values. For too long we have made a fetish of tolerating the intolerable in the name of equality.

No one wants to turn the clock back to deprive women of equal rights. But we must recognise that equality is not 'identicality'. Feminism never meant the degradation of women.

Somehow, we must restore the idea that women bring unique gifts and values to the national party. Reviving the traditional family would be a start. This would make men, women and children happier - and cut crime.
So what's stopping us?
 
Last edited:
I don't support the western form of feminism However i do agree that there should be more awareness and protection for Women Rights. Our society follows custom that are cultural and not islamic with regards to women. What people need not to do is to verbally abuse the women in Aurat March, but to educate them that such western concepts on feminism are more toxic than beneficial.
 
Thats the last thing we want in Pakistan.
Women are actually not getting their rights and awareness about it. We actually need movements to raise status of women in our country.

And up comes this horde of Women who literally have no idea at all about miseries of women and do no thing on ground that help uplift status of women in our society and have no idea about our cultural and societal values. All they are doing is giving breathing space to male supremacist and Mullah Types to further their extreme right agenda. These marches damage the cause of women rather then empowering them.

Ground reality is women are to blame for this situation in Pakistan and partly men also. We men We never Train our boys to create a society that is safe for woman to move out and do their daily life work like job, groceries, social gatherings, going for self care like doctors. We never encourage our daughters to become tough and face the realities of world as it is compared to how we brought up our boys. We never arm our daughters them with enough skills and emotional intelligence to become an independent human that can take care of itself in this world. The product is 99% of our ladies are mentally incapable of standing up on their own and are under Dependence syndrome. Honestly they don't want to work hard like their male counterparts resulting half of our labor force being dull comfort and gossip loving home birds. You cannot get your rights by such stupid marches or by crying. You have to bust yourself and work hard. become like males. Practical, Emotionally intelligent, Patient, Hard working, dedicated, less complaining more planning etc.
Rich folks who earn enough to make up all their needs can say whatever they want about women working or not. But middle class might have other views when they can barely make enough to support their homes in these times of High Inflation and rising prices.
Most People are not able to earn enough to afford basic amenities of life for themselves and their kids, And look at all these intellectuals talking about either women should work or not on one end and mera jism meri marzi on the other end. Both ends far far away from ground realities.
 
pls have a look.
D1Rn3yHX0AEUA_a.jpg

32 (1).jpg

aurat-march-2.jpg
which kind of agenda are they upto.
which one of us can watch these cards with mother or sister??

There is no evil "patriarchy"; yes, there is evil, but men aren't the only ones holding the reins of this evil; so too are women holding these reins, and their victims are the weak and powerless men, women and children.





sir in most of these cases these childs were abused by female. because male dont interact with workers. but these crimes are committed mostly by women.
 
Last edited:
sir in most of these cases these childs were abused by female. because mail dont interact with workers. but these crimes are committed mostly by women.
Yes, I'm aware, and that's the hypocrisy of this whole 'aurat march' sham; these the pampered liberal elite class women are themselves beating and oppressing girls from poor families while crying crocodile tears about Male oppression.
 
uqp1a0h2x5l41.png

Now this is interesting.why these aurat march womens talk against her?
Maybe because she speaks good things for Pakistan and they cannot digest it.and their anti Pakistan agenda get hurt.

Aurat March is funded by Open Societies Foundation of Jewish billionaire George Soros.
I heard on a programme of bol news.india is also involved in funding via proxies.
I think this is possible because of people like marvi sirmad who have contacts in india.
 
I believe this is the third year in a row that we're having this so called 'Aurat March' in Pakistan, and there are a couple of noteworthy points that i believe everyone should take into account regarding this movement.

1) No movement of this scale with this kind of coordination we are seeing can survive without some kind of directives and funding to organize and direct it towards an agenda. Therefore, who is funding this 'aurat march'?

2) Why is the media providing them so much publicity? That too sympathetic publicity? For example the recent back and forth between Khalil ur Rehman and Marvi Sirmed; it was obvious Sirmed was the aggressor yet she gets off scott free whereas the former receives the brunt of attacks from media establishment despite majority of Pakistanis sympathizing with him in this instance, where even though his language was detestable the aggressor was clearly the feminist. Does this not show a media agenda which is opposed to the sentiments of majority Pakistanis?

3) What is the agenda of the proponents of this 'aurat march'? They claim to be proponents of "womens rights", something which they have failed to define and how it even applies to the majority of Pakistani women when most of these Feminists are upper class pampered Liberal women who are more likely than not projecting their own bad experiences in extramarital affairs with similar minded Liberal, irreligious, non-committal men looking to simply 'pump N dump' these Liberal women, who then trash the very conservative norms of majority of Pakistani society; norms which have their basis in Islamic values like male guardianship of female relatives against predatory and exploitive men.

4) Every movement is characterized by its slogans which summarize its essence, which in this 'aurat marchs'' case is basically "tu keray to stud, mein kerroon to slut", "taangein khol ke bethoon gi, kya ker lo ge?", "khana khud garam ker lo" and "mera jism meri merzi", among other ludicrous slogans. How exactly does this relate to genuine cases of abuse of women (which Islam already fights against and is the basis for the moral guide of the people of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, but which the state has failed to uphold) within the Pakistani context? I don't think anyone here doubts that the last thing on the mind of an acid attack victim in some rural part of Pakistan is "tangein khol ke bhetna" in a public place, if it even is to begin with.


Copy-Paste Neo-Colonial Feminist Stooges

Rather, all these slogans are not even relevant to the Pakistani context.

Slogans like "Mera jism meri merzi" are direct copy-paste Google-translate versions of American feminist slogan 'my body my choice' which became popularized during the 2016-2018 period due to sexual allegations and obscene remarks of men like Donald Trump and Harvey Weinstein, among other super Liberal, Hollywood affiliated Western Elites; the exact types that these Pakistani neo-colonial Feminist stooges share their common hatred of Islam and its conservative values with; Islamic values like male guardianship over females against predatory men; the exact thing that would protect women from men who only desire to use and abuse them. If anyone would like to contest this statement then the onus is on them to prove where in the example of the blessed Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) they can find a case for the contrary?


But there is a common denominator here; men like Donald Trump and Harvey Weinstein, who I'm sure have their counterparts in Pakistani society, and women like Pakistani Liberals/Feminists have a common ground; all three have a raging hatred for Islam and the healthy conservative traditional values it teaches; the former because it will prevent them from exploiting vulnerable women; the latter because they suffer severe inferiority complex vis a vis the former and when they get used-and-abused by their Liberal male counterparts (since religious & conservative men wouldn't touch these women) they direct their anger towards rest of society and its traditional values as they themselves have utterly failed in forming healthy relationships.



The End Result of 'Aurat March' Agenda

Will the agenda of the proponents of this 'aurat march' really lead to the Feminist utopia they claim it will bring to the Pakistani women?

Well, let's look at the lands in which this phenomena has already come to pass and from where Pakistani upper class pampered Feminists get their inspiration, namely the West:

1) Womens 'Sexual Liberation': With the removal of male guardianship and the free-choice to sleep around with as many sexual partners as she likes, today the average western woman not only has to contend with numerous sexually transmitted diseases and sexual exploitation by predatory males, but also the bleak future of putting her body through the wear-&-tear of multiple abortions, drug abuse and single parenthood should she decide to go through with her pregnancy.

2) "Free" Sex = Fatherless Children = Increase in Crime Rate: Children born to single mothers as a result of sleeping with multiple men, tend to experience higher rates of sexual abuse by the mothers numerous sexual partners, suffer from higher rates of mental health problems, suffer from lack of self confidence, have higher propensity for violence towards others, higher rate of suicide, higher rate of discontinuing education, higher rate of early sexual involvement, higher rate of drug use and addiction [Source Link] , etc. etc. the list is endless!! Knowing ones lineage and the presence of both biological parents in a child's life has shown to be very critical in child mental-health development which plays crucial role for emotional intelligence and social interaction.

3) Corporate wage-slavery: after having devoted the most fertile years of their lives pursuing careers, enriching the corporate executive bosses and being milked for taxes by the state bureaucracy like cows in a farm; these women exhaust themselves serving as economic cogs in a cut-throat system of competition; once the rust of infertility and old age kicks in and the biological reality hits like a brick wall that men and women really aren't the same, these women are tossed aside by the same cold ruthless corporate system they devoted their youthful years to serving, only to be replaced by a new batch of cogs for the corporate machinery as if they aren't humans but rather disposable components. When they could have spent these same years devoted to a family of their own; a family that would have provided them with comfort and security in their old age. Growing number of women having gone through this cycle are now expressing their regret now that they can't get married, or even if they have gotten married they can no longer conceive children.

The agenda of the 'aurat march' is clear as daylight; to undermine and destroy the already fragile social fabric of Pakistani society by attacking the family and turning men and women against each other where the majority of members of either gender don't actually fall under the category of the inter-gender war the Liberal neo-colonial chamchays of our society wish to import from abroad.


The Feminist Hypocrisy

There is a major problem of oppression and cruelty in Pakistani society, and its not women who are the sole victims of this oppression because if that was the case than this oppression would be equally distributed to all the women across the socioeconomic spectrum of Pakistani society.

The rich, pampered westernized Feminist aunty is not experiencing the same level of oppression that she is inflicting on the under-age village-girl servant who she uses to warm her food as she herself hypocritically taunts men with slogans like "khana khud garam ker lo".

The problem of Pakistani society is the rich and affluent oppressing their own countrymen & women; the wealthy exploiting the poor; the Feminist aunties beating their own underage female servants to death while crying about the "evil patriarchy oppressing women" on the internet.

There is no evil "patriarchy"; yes, there is evil, but men aren't the only ones holding the reins of this evil; so too are women holding these reins, and their victims are the weak and powerless men, women and children.





@Itachi @OsmanAli98 @LeGenD @Psychic @StormBreaker
Beautifully put, brother.

This time LGBTQ+ banners have been spotted in these SHAM Aurat March.

GOP is definitely sleeping.

I would also like to bring attention to the so-called Institute of Art and Culture in this discourse - breeding ground of immorality through the subtle art of education in Pakistan.

@Horus

Take notes, Sir.
 
Last edited:
Damn you people are so insecure. BTW aurut March is happening in Pakistan since 1980s.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom