Such gaps exist on both sides, please keep in mind.
It is not of gaps, it is the information of gaps .... that I aver to. That is more important.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Such gaps exist on both sides, please keep in mind.
It is not of gaps, it is the information of gaps .... that I aver to. That is more important.
you know so much about air force tell me how much time it take to cover 70 to 80 km with 1700km ??It is not of gaps, it is the information of gaps .... that I aver to. That is more important.
yes u should do the same to give a msg that its not a big deal to violate enter fuel miles and drop shits this msg for endians on the othrr side counter the local audience jo ma pen eek karahe hey pakistan army kiWhat do we hit? Do the same thing as the IAF and drop some bombs in uninhabited areas?
@Joe Shearer @Sam. @Nilgiri
Absolutely no similarities Vibrio. The US operation was far more involved and risky. US forces flew from Afghanistan across Pakistan in choppers, deployed troops, neutralized target and left without being detected.
The Indian approach was detected on radar, PAF fighters scrambled (Balakot is approx 42.2KM from the LoC, so a minute or 2 max for IAF to be within range), IAF drops bombs on what appears to have been empty forest and area and retreats when challenged by PAF. Everything done in 3/4 minutes.
You are smoking some really heavy stuff to make such a bogus comparison. I don't even know whether we should believe the OBL drama, but for the sake of discussion let's suppose it is true. There is a day and night difference between a hit and run operation which lasts a few minutes at most and one where you have to actually land and carry our at an operation for almost an hour.
India is nowhere near daddy America. Try landing here and getting out alive.
You don't see me talking here as Pakistan claims we did nothing and only to appease Indian public hence no counter action.
Whom do you think provided the US Intel for that raid ?
You missed the point by roughly a thousand miles.
It is, like I mentioned to @VCheng , not about gaps - but the information of 'gaps' being readily available.
For bold.
Yes, yes. Absolutely. Rather remarkably Indian Army and Air Force has been found to be shooting trees, herbs, shrubs and then civilians and cattle.
But inexplicably PA and PAF was found wanting when there was a continuous BARCAP/CAP being flown and claims made about the prowess of the forces on this very forum. So, ineptitude on whose side?
A flight of 12 Mirages, with AWACS, is a large target. And 4 mins also, is a long time.
Anyways, let us see what transpires next. Popcorn time I guess.
Am posting here. Right?
@Joe Shearer I love these fanboys.
You missed the point by roughly a thousand miles.
It is, like I mentioned to @VCheng , not about gaps - but the information of 'gaps' being readily available.
For bold.
Yes, yes. Absolutely. Rather remarkably Indian Army and Air Force has been found to be shooting trees, herbs, shrubs and then civilians and cattle.
But inexplicably PA and PAF was found wanting when there was a continuous BARCAP/CAP being flown and claims made about the prowess of the forces on this very forum. So, ineptitude on whose side?
A flight of 12 Mirages, with AWACS, is a large target. And 4 mins also, is a long time.
Anyways, let us see what transpires next. Popcorn time I guess.
Am posting here. Right?
@Joe Shearer I love these fanboys.
My post of a long time back. Early days here.
Fair point. But I will not go any further than that here.
So IAF planes can come inside Pakistan whenever they want and untill they fire on military installations PAF and Army will not shoot down IAF???
Hi,
For someone like you who is the age of my grand kids---I wipe my behind after I take a dump---.
Yeah rightApparently that is what you must ask of PAF and PA. I doubt he shall be able to answer that one.
so the place where iaf dropped bombes "Where not Pakistan" or is that place not worthy to defend ??? I am not talking about place , and that member too not talking about place …… I simply asking why our airdefence did not react …… Why our AA guns did not fire ???????Oh bhai, an attack on a government center or a city, would have been an outright act of war by India. Attacks on civilian centers and government are extremely unlikely. What the PA was expecting was an escalation by India with an attack on the military (they would argue that the PA camp was actually training militants, PA is supporting militants blah blah). His response was referring to the military planning for that contingency.
We don't have AA guns or SAM systems capable of intercepting these kinds of incursions everywhere in Pakistan. The best response Pakistan has is PAF at the moment. Had there been an attack on a military installation, the damage would have been reported back almost instantly, and the PAF would have responded. In this case, since the bombs were dropped into an empty space, no reports of damage, or even that bombs had been dropped, were available instantly, and by the time the PAF was in engagement range, the IAF was already back (2-4 minutes).so the place where iaf dropped bombes "Where not Pakistan" or is that place not worthy to defend ??? I am not talking about place , and that member too not talking about place …… I simply asking why our airdefence did not react …… Why our AA guns did not fire ???????
But I got answer they will only react if attack is on military installation ……….. Ironic!!!!!!!! istNT it
All the evidence, even international new agencies, point to the only damage being 'trees' and an 'empty mountainside'. Apparently your earlier comment regarding refraining from commenting given the lack of any evidence of the IAF actually hitting a 'training camp' does not prevent you from trolling.When our shells fall then soldiers becomes civilians,
Now they become trees, so they have updated their firewall it seems.
That works both ways. Gaps identified by the aggressor are also gaps acknowledged and addressed by the defender.It is, like I mentioned to @VCheng , not about gaps - but the information of 'gaps' being readily available.