Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[/QUOTE]How does my post answer my own question?
Are the backup power sources located at the same point as the main power source? How far apart? What security measures? How many perimeters have to be crossed before all power sources can be cut off? If one source is attacked, that tips off everyone that an attack is underway which means the other sources will be almost impossible to get to.
You have offered nothing in terms of how terrorists would address the logistical and security challenges in almost simultaneously destroying all power sources in a plant and causing a meltdown.
Assuming terrorists breach the outermost perimeter of a NPP, then what?
?
Guys nuke not safe is bit too much. The fact is propaganda will be created about nukes and rightly so, people are trying to corner Pakistan. Honestly Pakistan is new Afghanistan in terms of experiments.
yaar come on what do you see in big pictures ?? Will you hit the wall if there is another next targets will be bigger than this navy??
Point being that even this attack on a naval base resulted in minimal damage - the terrorists did no 'fly off' with a P3 or chopper.
Hypothetically, if such an attack did take place at a nuclear facility, the result would be the same - a few security personnel might be martyred, minor damage here and there, potential hostage situation, and eventually all terrorists killed.
There is simply nothing to suggest that an attack on a nuclear installation would result in a meltdown or any strategic assets being compromised. The amount of manpower and explosive material required to do that is something that is simply impossible for any terrorist organization to put together.
wht i dont understand is, why you dont ban these trolls??
i think the strategy was to make terrorist mentally & physically tired, meanwhile also secure the assets present at the base. remember that these are very important & expensive assets to have. it's been seven hours since terrorist got in to the base, imagine the stress on their mind.
I mentioned before, it is either Palestine or second Afghanistan. Soon, we will throw stones or rocks just like them.
Point being that even this attack on a naval base resulted in minimal damage - the terrorists did no 'fly off' with a P3 or chopper.
Hypothetically, if such an attack did take place at a nuclear facility, the result would be the same - a few security personnel might be martyred, minor damage here and there, potential hostage situation, and eventually all terrorists killed.
There is simply nothing to suggest that an attack on a nuclear installation would result in a meltdown or any strategic assets being compromised. The amount of manpower and explosive material required to do that is something that is simply impossible for any terrorist organization to put together.