Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the court has no laws to deal with these type of terrorists. those countries that have such problem have special laws to dela with these a$$holes. But in Pakistan, where 'parliament is supreme' stuffed with time passers and opportunists, there are no such laws.
Its the job of parliament to make such laws. Only then the courts will be able to deal with them. Criminal laws cant fight terrorists. I hope its clear enough.
Too many pink members today. Kafi bharation nai laat khai hai aaj.
Apóllōn;3316354 said:Afghan... local?
PAF officials said that only one of aircraft at the base was damaged in the attack.
Several squadrons of fighters and surveillance planes are believed to be housed at Kamras Minhas base. Officials also confirmed that over 30 planes were parked at the base, including state-of-the-art JF-17 Thunder fighter jets.
Criminal laws cant fight terrorists. I hope its clear enough.
Law or no Law...matters nothing... there is enough law on paper to deal with these morons....THE ISSUE IS THAT THERE IS NO WILL.. .
Do you seriously find it funny to bring out topics like this under such tense situation? Is it by design or by default?
damage to Il-78 midas would be great loss for PAF. (considering the fact that pakistan has only 4 of them)
Saw one in the footage, it wasn't destroyed, may be damaged?The IL-78 was hit, lets await for more info on whether it was damaged or destroyed.
Losing an IL-78 would be a significant loss.
Militants attack Pakistan nuclear air base - Telegraph
Word destroyed is not used by the Telegraph. But direct hit on a spot that causes secondary explosions would deinitely mean a total loss, but a shrapnel hitting would be different. So yes there is confusion, lets hope for the best.
Saw one in the footage, it wasn't destroyed, may be damaged?The IL-78 was hit, lets await for more info on whether it was damaged or destroyed.
Losing an IL-78 would be a significant loss.
Militants attack Pakistan nuclear air base - Telegraph
Word destroyed is not used by the Telegraph. But direct hit on a spot that causes secondary explosions would deinitely mean a total loss, but a shrapnel hitting would be different. So yes there is confusion, lets hope for the best.
Saw one in the footage, it wasn't destroyed, may be damaged?
Just saying looking at the pink names at the bottom of the screen.
But which aircraft was this one? IL-78 or C-130.
If it is only damage and that too by an RPG then most probably it would be back in air within months if not weeks.
Saw one in the footage, it wasn't destroyed, may be damaged?
damage to Il-78 midas would be great loss for PAF. (considering the fact that pakistan has only 4 of them)
Yaar, i have been trying to find out, the A/D is not answering his mobile, even a burst landing gear would be considered as damaged. Geo showed footage of at least one IL-78 taking off.