Dhara
BANNED
- Joined
- May 3, 2017
- Messages
- 473
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
No need to inform you since you would be busy in search of your new country.Jab KHALI -STHAN Mil Jaye to Bata dena
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No need to inform you since you would be busy in search of your new country.Jab KHALI -STHAN Mil Jaye to Bata dena
Operation Bluestar was necessary... terrorists needed to be killed... just like Operation Lal Masjid was important for you guys...
Killing of Indira Gandhi and what followed was a political riot.. just like 1947 partition riots.
The Lal Masjid operation was only against few that led to killing of scores of students held hostage by these terrorists. But still no aftermath massacre took place unlike Blue Star operation and Indira killing.
Yes.. both were fallout of a political situation...you are comparing the biggest partition aftermaths with that of an individual's killing ?
Both were two separate but interconnected incidents ....Blue Star triggered a wave if militancy... that resulted in Indira Gandhi's killing... that in turn triggered retaliation my members of Congress (a political party).
Just like Lal Masjid triggered wave of militancy inside Pakistan...
Yes.. both were fallout of a political situation...
Wrong . Congress is a secular party.. so the riots were secular.. or left wing riots.... it had nothign to do with Hindus... even Muslims equally contributed to these secular riots.lal masjid triggered militancy was by an organized nameless faceless terrorists with funding from abroad so finding those terrorists arresting them and punishing them needed a long period and we did neutralise many of them. While your political part aka Congress was and is Hindu in nature and faith mostly despite the fact that sanghis may hide behind secular word to distance the faith from 84 massacre of Sikhs. But ok for a moment even if we call it just political then why India failed to give justice to Sikhs despite the fact that she had a Sikh PM once as well.
We are not talking about the minorities in the first place here. We are talking about Indian official crimes against own large number of Sikhs with the patronage of Indian government.
You can open a thread about Pakistan I will gladly respond.
BTW here in Pakistan not only minorities but majority are not safe from terrorists who have different channels of funding and nourishment.
You gave them state to avoid separation besides Sikhs and Punjab are contributing to your economy.India has given the Sikhs a state where they are in majority. The Indian government has bent over backwards to accomodate them. The whole violence in Punjab in the 1980s is a case of politicians and extremists running amok. A lot of people lost their lives including Indira Gandhi. There is no point visiting the past. It is time to look to the future.
@Irfan Baloch @Icarus @waz @Jungibaaz @WAJsalThat is a common counter-insurgency technique when dealing with terrorists, it happens everywhere.
Even in Kashmir when someone joins Hiuzbul Mujahideen or other Pakistan based terror outfit like LeT, Indian Army shows up at their home for "interrogation" Nine months later, the wife or sister of the terrorist is giving birth due to said "interrogation" by Army.
It is a very good deterrent against Kashmiri (or other) men joining terrorist outfits, because it makes them afraid what might happen to their sisters and wives if they leave to join these terror outfits.
everyone wants their own state to runYou gave them state to avoid separation besides Sikhs and Punjab are contributing to your economy.
Even Haryanvi culture is different from Punjabi then why the hell are u claiming Haryana as Khalistan.No their killers are alive and we don't want to live with you. Our religion is different our culture is different.
I respect Punjabis and Punjabi culture but even a smaller state like Haryana have a larger GDP and is contributing more to the economy. So punjab's contribution won't affect Indian economy much.You gave them state to avoid separation besides Sikhs and Punjab are contributing to your economy.
They already separated from us on the basis of religion and now we are demanding our own homeland on the same basis.So this demand for Khalistan includes the part of Punjab which falls under Pakistani control right?? If not then it's a pathetic false flagged propaganda attempt by our neighbors.
Before 1966 Haryana was a part of PunjabEven Haryanvi culture is different from Punjabi then why the hell are u claiming Haryana as Khalistan.