Atomic bombs and poverty

[MarkTheTruth]

By I. M. Mohsin

A poor country is a country which cannot afford to have a President and yet it has a President. A poor country is a country which cannot afford to have a Parliament and yet it has a Parliament. A poor country is a country which cannot afford to have a brigade of ministers and yet it has such a brigade with a Prime Minister as the Brigadier General. The President, the Prime Minister and the ministers of a poor country are stunningly more expensive than their counterparts in a rich country. The administrators of a rich country are hopelessly less paid as compared with the administrators of a poor country. One can’t help believing that every administrator of a rich country must be yearning to exchange his status with the status of an administrator of a poor country. But the yearning can never become a reality. No administrator of a poor country is such a fool as to exchange his gold for wood.

Administration in a rich country means great responsibilities. Administration in a poor country means pure fun and revelries. In a poor country, the rulers have an army of advisers. The advisers have their own advisers. Sometimes the total number of the advisers far exceeds the total number of the ministers. Imagine the cost! But to hell with the cost. To have a herd of advisers is a matter of great national pride for the rulers of a poor country. The administrators of a rich country feed the masses. The administrators of a poor country starve the masses. The administrators of a rich country are not paid much for feeding the masses. The administrators of a poor country are paid torrentially for starving the masses.

In a rich country, the rulers are at the mercy of ‘justice’. In a poor country, ‘justice’ is at the mercy of the rulers. In a poor country, every common citizen keeps asking every other citizen: “Please, could you tell me what is ‘justice’?” Every citizen answers: “The word keeps hitting my ears round the clock but what it means has always been a mystery.” Poor citizens! They can never know the meaning of ‘justice’ because ‘justice’ is not permitted by the rulers to enter the country.

Darwin says that only the fittest survive. Obviously, he means that only the physically strongest are the fittest to survive. But the rulers of a poor country have denounced the Darwinian doctrine as sure rubbish. They firmly believe that only the richest are the fittest to survive. Since they have a passion for living as rulers throughout their entire lifespan, they keep amassing wealth by all sorts of foulest means. Since they cannot rob other countries, they keep robbing their own motherland. They rob it so recklessly that nothing is left for the masses but starvation. The motherland is extremely depressed. The motherland alternatively looks at its robber-sons and the starving-sons. It just doesn’t know what to do. The robber-sons enjoy the helplessness of the mother.

In a poor country, the rulers initially grab the national wealth by mysterious means. As the grabbing continues, a time comes when the wealth develops an addiction to be grabbed by the rulers. It enjoys being grabbed so much that it starts pouring itself voluntarily into the rulers’ pockets. The wealth enjoys the companionship of the rulers so much that it hates tasting even a casual look at the masses.

The economists have told us that the masses of a poor country live below the poverty-line. But they have never told us where the rulers live. They know it but they dare not disclose it. They are mortally scared of the rulers. They apprehend that if they were to give a full-blooded picture of the lifestyle of the rulers, the rulers will get furious and they might slaughter the economists and throw the corpses to the vultures.

It is a moral obligation of the rich countries to get the masses of a poor country liberated from the barbarity of the rulers. But, unfortunately, the liberation would be extremely damaging for the liberators. The reason is that the rulers of the poor countries keep their wealth in the rich countries. Obviously, a liberation effort on the part of a rich country would be economically a very risky business.

India is a poor country. The majority of its population lives below the poverty line. It has manufactured atomic weapons. These weapons are meant for protecting the citizens against the foreign invaders. But India has manufactured no weapons for protecting its citizens against poverty. India doesn’t mind if the citizens are crushed by poverty. But it would not allow foreign invaders to crush its citizens.

The writer is an academic.

Atomic bombs and poverty | Pakistan | News | Newspaper | Daily | English | Online

 

[MarkTheTruth]

A brilliant piece of work

I am sure, our Indian brother would love to read and appreciate it.

 

[Ganga]

By I. M. Mohsin

A poor country is a country which cannot afford to have a President and yet it has a President. A poor country is a country which cannot afford to have a Parliament and yet it has a Parliament. A poor country is a country which cannot afford to have a brigade of ministers and yet it has such a brigade with a Prime Minister as the Brigadier General. The President, the Prime Minister and the ministers of a poor country are stunningly more expensive than their counterparts in a rich country. The administrators of a rich country are hopelessly less paid as compared with the administrators of a poor country. One can’t help believing that every administrator of a rich country must be yearning to exchange his status with the status of an administrator of a poor country. But the yearning can never become a reality. No administrator of a poor country is such a fool as to exchange his gold for wood.

Administration in a rich country means great responsibilities. Administration in a poor country means pure fun and revelries. In a poor country, the rulers have an army of advisers. The advisers have their own advisers. Sometimes the total number of the advisers far exceeds the total number of the ministers. Imagine the cost! But to hell with the cost. To have a herd of advisers is a matter of great national pride for the rulers of a poor country. The administrators of a rich country feed the masses. The administrators of a poor country starve the masses. The administrators of a rich country are not paid much for feeding the masses. The administrators of a poor country are paid torrentially for starving the masses.

In a rich country, the rulers are at the mercy of ‘justice’. In a poor country, ‘justice’ is at the mercy of the rulers. In a poor country, every common citizen keeps asking every other citizen: “Please, could you tell me what is ‘justice’?” Every citizen answers: “The word keeps hitting my ears round the clock but what it means has always been a mystery.” Poor citizens! They can never know the meaning of ‘justice’ because ‘justice’ is not permitted by the rulers to enter the country.

Darwin says that only the fittest survive. Obviously, he means that only the physically strongest are the fittest to survive. But the rulers of a poor country have denounced the Darwinian doctrine as sure rubbish. They firmly believe that only the richest are the fittest to survive. Since they have a passion for living as rulers throughout their entire lifespan, they keep amassing wealth by all sorts of foulest means. Since they cannot rob other countries, they keep robbing their own motherland. They rob it so recklessly that nothing is left for the masses but starvation. The motherland is extremely depressed. The motherland alternatively looks at its robber-sons and the starving-sons. It just doesn’t know what to do. The robber-sons enjoy the helplessness of the mother.

In a poor country, the rulers initially grab the national wealth by mysterious means. As the grabbing continues, a time comes when the wealth develops an addiction to be grabbed by the rulers. It enjoys being grabbed so much that it starts pouring itself voluntarily into the rulers’ pockets. The wealth enjoys the companionship of the rulers so much that it hates tasting even a casual look at the masses.

The economists have told us that the masses of a poor country live below the poverty-line. But they have never told us where the rulers live. They know it but they dare not disclose it. They are mortally scared of the rulers. They apprehend that if they were to give a full-blooded picture of the lifestyle of the rulers, the rulers will get furious and they might slaughter the economists and throw the corpses to the vultures.

It is a moral obligation of the rich countries to get the masses of a poor country liberated from the barbarity of the rulers. But, unfortunately, the liberation would be extremely damaging for the liberators. The reason is that the rulers of the poor countries keep their wealth in the rich countries. Obviously, a liberation effort on the part of a rich country would be economically a very risky business.

India is a poor country. The majority of its population lives below the poverty line. It has manufactured atomic weapons. These weapons are meant for protecting the citizens against the foreign invaders. But India has manufactured no weapons for protecting its citizens against poverty. India doesn’t mind if the citizens are crushed by poverty. But it would not allow foreign invaders to crush its citizens.

The writer is an academic.

Atomic bombs and poverty | Pakistan | News | Newspaper | Daily | English | Online

The article has been directed against India but the same thing can be told about Pakistan.Now pls dont tell me that Pakistan is a rich country.
In the article the definition of a poor country is a country which cannot have a president,Parliament and ministers.Now that is the most absurd definition of a poor country i have ever seen.
The article also mentions that administrators of rich countries are poorly paid.I doubt it.The salary of Indian president is Rs 100000 while the Us president is $600000

 

[Indian_Idol]

By I. M. Mohsin

A poor country is a country which cannot afford to have a President and yet it has a President. A poor country is a country which cannot afford to have a Parliament and yet it has a Parliament. A poor country is a country which cannot afford to have a brigade of ministers and yet it has such a brigade with a Prime Minister as the Brigadier General. The President, the Prime Minister and the ministers of a poor country are stunningly more expensive than their counterparts in a rich country. The administrators of a rich country are hopelessly less paid as compared with the administrators of a poor country. One can’t help believing that every administrator of a rich country must be yearning to exchange his status with the status of an administrator of a poor country. But the yearning can never become a reality. No administrator of a poor country is such a fool as to exchange his gold for wood.

Administration in a rich country means great responsibilities. Administration in a poor country means pure fun and revelries. In a poor country, the rulers have an army of advisers. The advisers have their own advisers. Sometimes the total number of the advisers far exceeds the total number of the ministers. Imagine the cost! But to hell with the cost. To have a herd of advisers is a matter of great national pride for the rulers of a poor country. The administrators of a rich country feed the masses. The administrators of a poor country starve the masses. The administrators of a rich country are not paid much for feeding the masses. The administrators of a poor country are paid torrentially for starving the masses.

In a rich country, the rulers are at the mercy of ‘justice’. In a poor country, ‘justice’ is at the mercy of the rulers. In a poor country, every common citizen keeps asking every other citizen: “Please, could you tell me what is ‘justice’?” Every citizen answers: “The word keeps hitting my ears round the clock but what it means has always been a mystery.” Poor citizens! They can never know the meaning of ‘justice’ because ‘justice’ is not permitted by the rulers to enter the country.

Darwin says that only the fittest survive. Obviously, he means that only the physically strongest are the fittest to survive. But the rulers of a poor country have denounced the Darwinian doctrine as sure rubbish. They firmly believe that only the richest are the fittest to survive. Since they have a passion for living as rulers throughout their entire lifespan, they keep amassing wealth by all sorts of foulest means. Since they cannot rob other countries, they keep robbing their own motherland. They rob it so recklessly that nothing is left for the masses but starvation. The motherland is extremely depressed. The motherland alternatively looks at its robber-sons and the starving-sons. It just doesn’t know what to do. The robber-sons enjoy the helplessness of the mother.

In a poor country, the rulers initially grab the national wealth by mysterious means. As the grabbing continues, a time comes when the wealth develops an addiction to be grabbed by the rulers. It enjoys being grabbed so much that it starts pouring itself voluntarily into the rulers’ pockets. The wealth enjoys the companionship of the rulers so much that it hates tasting even a casual look at the masses.

The economists have told us that the masses of a poor country live below the poverty-line. But they have never told us where the rulers live. They know it but they dare not disclose it. They are mortally scared of the rulers. They apprehend that if they were to give a full-blooded picture of the lifestyle of the rulers, the rulers will get furious and they might slaughter the economists and throw the corpses to the vultures.

It is a moral obligation of the rich countries to get the masses of a poor country liberated from the barbarity of the rulers. But, unfortunately, the liberation would be extremely damaging for the liberators. The reason is that the rulers of the poor countries keep their wealth in the rich countries. Obviously, a liberation effort on the part of a rich country would be economically a very risky business.

India is a poor country. The majority of its population lives below the poverty line. It has manufactured atomic weapons. These weapons are meant for protecting the citizens against the foreign invaders. But India has manufactured no weapons for protecting its citizens against poverty. India doesn’t mind if the citizens are crushed by poverty. But it would not allow foreign invaders to crush its citizens.

The writer is an academic.

Atomic bombs and poverty | Pakistan | News | Newspaper | Daily | English | Online

yes India is a such a poor country and used all its wealth to create a atomic bomb and pakistan is very rich state where there is no poverty all their citzens are safe. no explosions, no foreign aid and a massive $5 billion defence budget(India around $30Billion), 100% literacy, first class healthcare, etc...
come on man we know the truth your economy is nothing when compared to us. you people have got lot of resources and a very small population. but still you cant even come near us. when you post a bashing article plz do note we have 9 times bigger population than yours, and we are moving ahead faster than you guys could imagine. Even now you are completely reliable on other country(China) for your every need.before blaming others first analyze who you are in front of them(India) and then start to criticize..

the author must have had a dream of India nuking Pakistan and when he woke he wrote this great piece of work to feed some India basher.

 

[HAL/FGFA]

A brilliant piece of work

I am sure, our Indian brother would love to read and appreciate it.

Your Indian brothers know their limitations and capabilities thats why we second fastest growing nation . First tell me how much rich you are ????

Pakistan not even equivalent to India in every aspect ... tell me any field and i`l show you truth ...

 

[Marxist]

This section is for current affairs & social issues of Pakistan, not for this discussion..

 

[sirius]

A brilliant piece of work

I am sure, our Indian brother would love to read and appreciate it.

Have you seen a mirror in your life? By rating worlds second fastest trillion dollar economy poor,the writer has clearly lost his mind..and yes we appreciate efforts taken by the writer to write this piece of ****

 

[Speaker]

To Indian members: There is no point in attacking Pakistan or the 'messenger'. However, there is plenty to shoot the message with. The title was promising but the article/post/blog is disappointing. The quality of writing is pretty ordinary, facts are non-existent and interpretation is juvenile. Seems right out of the 5th and 6th essays on why nuclear weapons are bad.

The author is correct about salaries of heads of states - people are paid according to the status, and that disparity is felt more in poor countries. The annual salary of the US president is roughly 10 times the average US salary. But it must be about 100 times in India. And it is much worse in other countries like Zimbabwe. But this hardly means anything, since people have been doing this since time immemorial and across the world - sacrificing their 'comforts' for the 'glory' of their leaders. In the western world, don't the British support the monarchy even though the Civil list is exorbitant?

And how does having nuclear weapons have anything to do with poverty eradication? Nuclear weapons have done more to prevent wars and other casualties. Religion is a bigger issues and countries are getting more arrogant. Yet why is it that the world has fought fewer wars after WW2? People don't seem to understand the concept of deterrence. Like I said, juvenile write-up.

Having said that, poverty must be eradicated, but this article hardly seems to focus on solutions.

 

[Solomon2]

here comes the real problem,and he wrote a all these bs for last few lines.

If he had written "Pakistan" would it have been published? I suspect a last-minute substitution, so you are actually supposed to think "Pakistan" where it reads "India."

 

[Marxist]

If he had written "Pakistan" would it have been published? I suspect a last-minute substitution, so you are actually supposed to think "Pakistan" where it reads "India."

it can be read that way also...

 

[Justin Joseph]

Another peace of crap and wet dream.

This type of fantasy writers are responsible for the bad situations in Pakistan, as they kept the Pakistani people in illusion and they don't talk about situation and problems of Pakistan. And their problem never got solved.

So, instead of wasting is energies and hate towards India, If writer has concerned about Pakistan or love Pakistan the situation would have been different.