What's new

Asma Jahangir asks SC, PEMRA to act against TV anchor for 37 bank accounts sham

As for the "hypocrisy" (you've mentioned it but haven't exactly listed any) opinions and are bound to change over 4 decades of advocating.
4 decades?Nah more like 4 years remember her views about freedom of media in the whole Hamid Mir story and how she defended him?Why she wants govt to crackdown on dissenting voices now?
The ban against Altaf Hussain is militarily motivated
And why exactly is it a problem if someone with murder charges and someone who openly calls for breakup of Pakistan is banned?
MQM london is not registered inside Pakistan it cant even run for local body elections in Pakistan it IS an illegal entity
the article you quoted she agrees with the courts decision
No she doesnot she did something that counts as contempt of court but some ladlas are left off the hook easily by our courts despite having spouses default on 50 million loans
https://www.dawn.com/news/1349491
 
.
Its obvious Sharif clan's opponents were trying to score political browny points over Zainab's rape and killing, disgusting if you ask me.
Its disgusting that they are using rape cases for political scoring whther its rape/murder of Zainab in kasur or rape/murder of asma in Mardan.

We have so many idiots Journalists in media who invent conspiracy theories and give verdict every now and then. There should be some checks on them
 
.
4 decades?Nah more like 4 years remember her views about freedom of media in the whole Hamid Mir story and how she defended him?Why she wants govt to crackdown on dissenting voices now?

And why exactly is it a problem if someone with murder charges and someone who openly calls for breakup of Pakistan is banned?
MQM london is not registered inside Pakistan it cant even run for local body elections in Pakistan it IS an illegal entity

No she doesnot she did something that counts as contempt of court but some ladlas are left off the hook easily by our courts despite having spouses default on 50 million loans
https://www.dawn.com/news/1349491

There is a valid difference between freedom of expression and saying "agar maira saboot ghalat nikla tou mujhay phaansi day daina".
Contempt of court would be denying or showing resistance to court decisions, in that last article you posted she clearly agreed with the supreme courts decisions. What she is asking for is equality across the board which certainly doesn't exist. Do you ever remember someone from law enforcement or security establishments standing in court and defending themselves.

The ranger who was filmed shooting an innocent man to death in Karachi in 2014 was "pardoned" by the president. SSP Rao Anwar is out and about after being involved in possible several extra judicial killings. You bring up MQM and yes they have contributed greatly into making Karachi a living hell but like I said before did you see any judicial inquiry being done in the 90's when hundreds of their members simply disappeared and later found in body bags (some remain unfound to this day). The point she is making is that if politicians are still bound by the law (as it should be) then so should all state establishments.
 
.
There is a valid difference between freedom of expression and saying "agar maira saboot ghalat nikla tou mujhay phaansi day daina".
You do realize her target wasnt one journalist but all journalist who dare criticize pmln right?Do read her comment again
And this was exactly what pmln govt did again and again from banning Nickelodeon to talk shows over political differences
Contempt of court would be denying or showing resistance to court decisions, in that last article you posted she clearly agreed with the supreme courts decisions. What she is asking for is equality across the board which certainly doesn't exist.
She is calling it wrong again and again and asking court why did you punish nawaz she literally lectured SC on how they were wrong in how they dealt with this case she wanted this case to be dealt like the cases against pmln in past
If a layman criticizes a court,s judgement jail and/or fine awaits him while she let off the hook why?
What she is asking for is equality across the board which certainly doesn't exist.
Heard of the term supreme judicial counsel?
Do you ever remember someone from law enforcement or security establishments standing in court and defending themselves.
Like other parts of the world they get tried in army courts for most offences
The ranger who was filmed shooting an innocent man to death in Karachi in 2014 was "pardoned" by the president.
And the president belongs to which party exactly?
You bring up MQM and yes they have contributed greatly into making Karachi a living hell but like I said before did you see any judicial inquiry being done in the 90's when hundreds of their members simply disappeared and later found in body bags (some remain unfound to this day).
I am all for investigating all murders including those done by death squads of a particular party by using ambulances as transport
The point she is making is that if politicians are still bound by the law (as it should be) then so should all state establishments.
The point she is making is all laws that even remotely lead to accountability of those in power should be removed because Pakistan had dictatorship in the past
 
.
You do realize her target wasnt one journalist but all journalist who dare criticize pmln right?Do read her comment again
And this was exactly what pmln govt did again and again from banning Nickelodeon to talk shows over political differences

She is calling it wrong again and again and asking court why did you punish nawaz she literally lectured SC on how they were wrong in how they dealt with this case she wanted this case to be dealt like the cases against pmln in past
If a layman criticizes a court,s judgement jail and/or fine awaits him while she let off the hook why?

Heard of the term supreme judicial counsel?

Like other parts of the world they get tried in army courts for most offences

And the president belongs to which party exactly?

I am all for investigating all murders including those done by death squads of a particular party by using ambulances as transport

The point she is making is all laws that even remotely lead to accountability of those in power should be removed because Pakistan had dictatorship in the past

Criticism of the govt regardless of whoever's in power is fair game as long as its not does not include serious allegations (like what Dr SM did) if she is against this then she needs to be called out on it as right of expression is the most basic human right.

As for your claim of contempt, only a completely moral less person would claim that NS was saadiq and amin and should've been allowed to go on. Saying that civilian govt shouldn't be held accountable because dictators weren't bought into court is a stupid statement (two wrongs won't make a right) Whether you and I believe in accountability and inquiries of security establishments is meaningless as all that matters is whether the law can ever bring these people in for accountability (there have been 0 inquiries on enforced disappearances of activists and journalists and unsurprisingly the media has remained quiet on it too)
 
.
You do realize her target wasnt one journalist but all journalist who dare criticize pmln right?Do read her comment again
And this was exactly what pmln govt did again and again from banning Nickelodeon to talk shows over political differences

She is calling it wrong again and again and asking court why did you punish nawaz she literally lectured SC on how they were wrong in how they dealt with this case she wanted this case to be dealt like the cases against pmln in past
If a layman criticizes a court,s judgement jail and/or fine awaits him while she let off the hook why?

Heard of the term supreme judicial counsel?

Like other parts of the world they get tried in army courts for most offences

And the president belongs to which party exactly?

I am all for investigating all murders including those done by death squads of a particular party by using ambulances as transport

The point she is making is all laws that even remotely lead to accountability of those in power should be removed because Pakistan had dictatorship in the past

These scum libturds will back each other no matter what. And here we have another defending and praising this traitor!

and the libturds protecting Nawaz Shariff ... :lol:

It has been proven without a doubt that libturds protect and defend criminals and corrupt!
 
. .

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom