AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
Outside of such assumptions and hope (of a Pakistani stagnation or regression), the 'getting ducks in a row' idea you posited seems rather far fetched.That kind of assumption and hope remains confined to the domains of the PDF, I assure you.
As many violations as India has undertaken. We can keep going back through history and tallying up the violations, but at the end of the day neither side is innocent. India and Pakistan have only one 'mutually agreed upon means of resolution of the J&K Dispute', which are the UNSC Resolutions. India reneged on them and one could argue that subsequent military attempts to alter the status qou by Pakistan were a response to India's violation of her international commitment to the UNSC Resolutions.My riposte, sir, remains, how many more instances of violation of your own solemn undertakings through multiple treaties signed, right from the formation of an independent State of Jammu & Kashmir (and entering into a standstill agreement with them) as a sovereign lawful state, will you continue to record and then assume a posture of invoking treaties/resolutions/negotiations as a mechanism of conflict resolution?
Has Pakistan, in any instance since the first day of formation of J&K as an independent state under the Maharaja, accepted it's own flagrant violation and aggression against what was technically an independent country formed by the very same act that gave legal status to Pakistan?
Junagadh acceded to Pakistan and its accession was accepted by Pakistan in 1947. Munavadh, I don't recall.Were the two territories acceded to and incorporated territories of Pakistan?