What's new

As it moves closer to Eritrea, Egypt eyes military base on Nora island

Philip the Arab

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
7,430
Reaction score
6
Country
Jordan
Location
United States
Cairo traditionally dismissed the idea of overseas regional bases owing to political sensitivities but has been investing in a new strategy to bolster its maritime power.
Sunday 15/03/2020
a1_81.jpg

A handout released by the Egyptian Presidency on January 9, 2018, shows Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi (C-L) welcoming the Eritrean President (C-R) Isaias Afwerki at the presidential palace in Cairo. (AFP)
There have been unconfirmed reports that Egypt may be moving close to an agreement with Eritrea, with which ties have been warming in recent years, to host a new Egyptian naval base on Nora island.

Cairo traditionally dismissed the idea of overseas regional bases owing to political sensitivities but has been investing in a new strategy to bolster its maritime power.

The reports suggest an agreement between Cairo and Asmara over an Egyptian deployment to Nora, an island on Dakhla Peninsula off the Eritrean coast. Egypt is believed to have a contingent of forces in Sawa, Eritrea, stationed at an Arab base reportedly secured by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates for a 30-year period.

Eritrea’s location at the southern entrance of the Red Sea gives it a growing strategic value. Rising international interest and competition in and around the Red Sea, with the Bab el Mandeb choke point to its south and the Suez Canal to its north, generated a renewed effort by Cairo and Riyadh to coordinate on the region’s maritime security architecture.

In January, Saudi efforts to build a new Red Sea bloc moved forward when representatives from eight countries signed a charter to establish the Council of Arab and African States bordering the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.

For Egypt, this development comes as part of a multipronged strategy to restore its influence and take on a greater security role in the region — particularly within the maritime sphere.

Egypt has seen new risks emerge with Yemen’s implosion, instability in Libya and earlier with maritime piracy off the Horn of Africa. Cairo’s policies are being driven by a new military build-up in the wider region that has featured a growing footprint for Iran and Turkey.

Turkey, which in December concluded a maritime border delimitation agreement with Libya, has its largest overseas military base in Somalia and secured a long-term lease for Suakin port from Sudan two years ago. More recently, massive gas finds in the Eastern Mediterranean raised tensions as Ankara lays claim to resources off the coast of Cyprus.

Egypt has agreements with Israel and Cyprus for the supply of natural gas by ship and via pipelines from their offshore fields, which it processes and re-exports from gas liquefaction stations in Idku and Damietta.

Last year, Egypt convened the East Mediterranean Gas Forum with the participation of Jordan, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Israel and the Palestinian territories in a bid to establish regional cooperation for the region’s expanding gas market.

Geological surveys suggesting potential gas reservoirs under the Red Sea’s seabed could signal an added maritime security significance for the basin beyond freedom of navigation.

In response to the region’s evolving security dynamics, Cairo has been investing in a major modernisation of its ageing, largely Soviet-era naval fleet to reassert itself as a true blue-water navy. In 2016, Cairo added two Mistral-class amphibious assault ships to its fleet to serve as command centres for the Egyptian Navy’s newly created North and South fleets.

Cairo added a FREMM multipurpose frigate and is said to be finalising the purchase of two more from Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri. Earlier, it concluded orders for six German-made MEKO A-200 frigates, four Gowind-class corvettes, three of which are to be built in Alexandria, and is awaiting delivery of 20 Falaj 2-class patrol boats.

Egypt has also been developing strategically positioned joint bases in Gargoub, on its north-western coast near the border with Libya, in Ras Banas on its south-eastern coast overlooking the Red Sea and at Port Said, close to the Suez Canal.

Increasing strategic premiums attached to overseas bases could well mean Cairo may soon need to revise its traditional policy on the issue and consider developing a strategic presence that enables extended power projection capability through arrangements with partners such as Eritrea.

Eritrea’s growing alignment with Egypt is, however, causing concerns with Ethiopia and Sudan. Cairo and Addis Ababa have been locked in a dispute over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), the continent’s biggest hydroelectric dam being constructed on the Nile River’s main tributary that could threaten Egypt’s water security.

Sudan, which backs GERD, has had complicated ties with Cairo and an unresolved dispute over the Egyptian-controlled Halayeb Triangle, which is near Egypt’s new Ras Banas base.

On the other hand, Ethiopia has been landlocked and without a coastline since Eritrea seceded from it in 1993 following a violent conflict that has killed more than 80,000.

Ethiopia and Eritrea technically remain at war and last witnessed major clashes in 2016. Having built one of Africa’s most capable air and ground forces, Addis Ababa’s confessed desire to reconstitute a naval capability to protect its interests at sea is giving rise to anxiety in Eritrea.

Sudan and Ethiopia have formed a joint military operation along their border whereas Sudan dispatched thousands of troops to its border with Eritrea in response to Egypt’s reported troop deployment to the country three years ago.

Egypt dismisses any intent to interfere in Ethiopia and Sudan as conspiratorial and “fake news.” Despite resolving key disagreements related to GERD with Ethiopia earlier this year when Washington hosted talks that involved the World Bank, symptoms of mistrust between the African neighbours linger.

As Egypt assumes an enhanced regional maritime security role, its future strategy may well need to feature deeper engagement on military matters with security partners such as Eritrea but it will also have to contend with the same traditional rivalries that opened up space in the region for an international military build-up in the first place.
 
.
Egypt needs to free the Palestinians in Gaza and allow full medical aid to go through to them to prevent a colossal tragedy.
 
. . .
Eritrea has very cordial ties with many Arab countries as well as ancient historical ties with us and Arab minorities living there. A very beautiful country too. A member state of the Arab league too.

For instance KSA already have military bases/military presence in the region. Neighboring Djibouti (similar story to Eritrea in terms of what I wrote above) is the Qatar of East Africa in terms of allowing foreign military bases (from KSA to China to France).

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-china-and-saudi-arabi_b_12194702

It is good business for Djibouti. Seems that Eritrea wants to follow in the footsteps of Djibouti. The historic peace deal signed with Ethiopia (Ethiopia ruled what is today Eritrea less than 40 years ago) and KSA/Arab League lobbying to end sanctions and welcome Eritrea back to the international community, much like what successfully occurred in Sudan recently, is great news for the Red Sea region.

It is important for the Arab world (in particular Arabia and Egypt) to continue the ancient historical ties to this part of Africa (which is one of the fastest growing areas in the world economically and population wise) which is strategic and rich in resources as well as giving access to the Sahel/Swahili (regions historically strongly tied to the Arab world as well) and the Sub-Saharan market.

So greater interconnection and mutually beneficial cooperation would increase the regional security as well as preventing illegal migration into KSA/GCC/Yemen/Egypt/Sudan.


Cairo traditionally dismissed the idea of overseas regional bases owing to political sensitivities but has been investing in a new strategy to bolster its maritime power.
Sunday 15/03/2020
a1_81.jpg

A handout released by the Egyptian Presidency on January 9, 2018, shows Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi (C-L) welcoming the Eritrean President (C-R) Isaias Afwerki at the presidential palace in Cairo. (AFP)
There have been unconfirmed reports that Egypt may be moving close to an agreement with Eritrea, with which ties have been warming in recent years, to host a new Egyptian naval base on Nora island.

Cairo traditionally dismissed the idea of overseas regional bases owing to political sensitivities but has been investing in a new strategy to bolster its maritime power.

The reports suggest an agreement between Cairo and Asmara over an Egyptian deployment to Nora, an island on Dakhla Peninsula off the Eritrean coast. Egypt is believed to have a contingent of forces in Sawa, Eritrea, stationed at an Arab base reportedly secured by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates for a 30-year period.

Eritrea’s location at the southern entrance of the Red Sea gives it a growing strategic value. Rising international interest and competition in and around the Red Sea, with the Bab el Mandeb choke point to its south and the Suez Canal to its north, generated a renewed effort by Cairo and Riyadh to coordinate on the region’s maritime security architecture.

In January, Saudi efforts to build a new Red Sea bloc moved forward when representatives from eight countries signed a charter to establish the Council of Arab and African States bordering the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.

For Egypt, this development comes as part of a multipronged strategy to restore its influence and take on a greater security role in the region — particularly within the maritime sphere.

Egypt has seen new risks emerge with Yemen’s implosion, instability in Libya and earlier with maritime piracy off the Horn of Africa. Cairo’s policies are being driven by a new military build-up in the wider region that has featured a growing footprint for Iran and Turkey.

Turkey, which in December concluded a maritime border delimitation agreement with Libya, has its largest overseas military base in Somalia and secured a long-term lease for Suakin port from Sudan two years ago. More recently, massive gas finds in the Eastern Mediterranean raised tensions as Ankara lays claim to resources off the coast of Cyprus.

Egypt has agreements with Israel and Cyprus for the supply of natural gas by ship and via pipelines from their offshore fields, which it processes and re-exports from gas liquefaction stations in Idku and Damietta.

Last year, Egypt convened the East Mediterranean Gas Forum with the participation of Jordan, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Israel and the Palestinian territories in a bid to establish regional cooperation for the region’s expanding gas market.

Geological surveys suggesting potential gas reservoirs under the Red Sea’s seabed could signal an added maritime security significance for the basin beyond freedom of navigation.

In response to the region’s evolving security dynamics, Cairo has been investing in a major modernisation of its ageing, largely Soviet-era naval fleet to reassert itself as a true blue-water navy. In 2016, Cairo added two Mistral-class amphibious assault ships to its fleet to serve as command centres for the Egyptian Navy’s newly created North and South fleets.

Cairo added a FREMM multipurpose frigate and is said to be finalising the purchase of two more from Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri. Earlier, it concluded orders for six German-made MEKO A-200 frigates, four Gowind-class corvettes, three of which are to be built in Alexandria, and is awaiting delivery of 20 Falaj 2-class patrol boats.

Egypt has also been developing strategically positioned joint bases in Gargoub, on its north-western coast near the border with Libya, in Ras Banas on its south-eastern coast overlooking the Red Sea and at Port Said, close to the Suez Canal.

Increasing strategic premiums attached to overseas bases could well mean Cairo may soon need to revise its traditional policy on the issue and consider developing a strategic presence that enables extended power projection capability through arrangements with partners such as Eritrea.

Eritrea’s growing alignment with Egypt is, however, causing concerns with Ethiopia and Sudan. Cairo and Addis Ababa have been locked in a dispute over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), the continent’s biggest hydroelectric dam being constructed on the Nile River’s main tributary that could threaten Egypt’s water security.

Sudan, which backs GERD, has had complicated ties with Cairo and an unresolved dispute over the Egyptian-controlled Halayeb Triangle, which is near Egypt’s new Ras Banas base.

On the other hand, Ethiopia has been landlocked and without a coastline since Eritrea seceded from it in 1993 following a violent conflict that has killed more than 80,000.

Ethiopia and Eritrea technically remain at war and last witnessed major clashes in 2016. Having built one of Africa’s most capable air and ground forces, Addis Ababa’s confessed desire to reconstitute a naval capability to protect its interests at sea is giving rise to anxiety in Eritrea.

Sudan and Ethiopia have formed a joint military operation along their border whereas Sudan dispatched thousands of troops to its border with Eritrea in response to Egypt’s reported troop deployment to the country three years ago.

Egypt dismisses any intent to interfere in Ethiopia and Sudan as conspiratorial and “fake news.” Despite resolving key disagreements related to GERD with Ethiopia earlier this year when Washington hosted talks that involved the World Bank, symptoms of mistrust between the African neighbours linger.

As Egypt assumes an enhanced regional maritime security role, its future strategy may well need to feature deeper engagement on military matters with security partners such as Eritrea but it will also have to contend with the same traditional rivalries that opened up space in the region for an international military build-up in the first place.
 
Last edited:
.
Could have something to do with Dam Ethiopia is building. :pop:
 
.
Uganda also plans to build a dam along Western Nile river. Eritrea also signaled it'll develop a water infrastructure along the Nile. Sudan is also looking for an investor who can agree to fund its dam project. It seems all of the countries along the Nile wants to develop dams along the Nile.

For Egpyt, it is better agreement is found amongst all of the states, that way it should receive its share of the water while other countries also get their share as well. The challenge is the population growth amongst these countries along the Nile and the demand to have food security and energy.

If agreement isn't found, a conflict is possible but it seems to be far off now.

 
.
Could have something to do with Dam Ethiopia is building. :pop:

Egypt's livelihood depends on the Nile (since forever) and they will never tolerate their livelihood being threatened. If that Ethiopian dam will pose an existential threat for Egypt, the dam will simply be destroyed and there is nothing that Ethiopia can do about it.

In the real world a compromise that will benefit every party whether Egypt, Sudan or Ethiopia will be reached. There is no other solution. Everyone will lose in case of a large-scale conflict.

Chinese involvement (business) is irrelevant here as Chinese investments in Egypt are bigger. They don't have the power nor will to engage in what for Egypt would be an existential threat and I highly doubt that Egypt would be alone in this fight.
 
Last edited:
. .
Egypt's livelihood depends on the Nile (since forever) and they will never tolerate their livelihood being threatened. If that Ethiopian dam will pose an existential threat for Egypt, the dam will simply be destroyed and there is nothing that Ethiopia can do about it.

In the real world a compromise that will benefit every party whether Egypt, Sudan or Ethiopia will be reached. There is no other solution. Everyone will lose in case of a large-scale conflict.

Chinese involvement (business) is irrelevant here as Chinese investments in Egypt are bigger. They don't have the power nor will to engage in what for Egypt would be an existential threat and I highly doubt that Egypt would be alone in this fight.


did you ever look where the nile begins.. if they decide to geht here and there water and to is it all along their lands that it needs full blown war..

and if a war happens than they can decide to put poisen into the nile if they want to its not as easy if you have ppl who could do anything they want.. because it begins in their country..

here the ppl need to talk and make agreements so that everyone has their share from ethopia to sudan to egypt
 
.
did you ever look where the nile begins.. if they decide to geht here and there water and to is it all along their lands that it needs full blown war..

and if a war happens than they can decide to put poisen into the nile if they want to its not as easy if you have ppl who could do anything they want.. because it begins in their country..

here the ppl need to talk and make agreements so that everyone has their share from ethopia to sudan to egypt

I have sailed on the Nile river.

Yes, I am well aware of the Nile River and it does not start in Ethiopia.

Hence why I wrote that a political solution should be found, which I have no reason to doubt will be the case, HOWEVER if Egypt's livelihood will be threatened by illegal moves from Ethiopia, Egypt will take military action.

As for poisoning the Nile, that is like shooting yourself in the foot and what do you think the consequences of such an action will be for a struggling/weak (albeit developing) Ethiopia?

There is no trouble with Burundi (the source of the Nile) or Sudan or the other 7 countries. It is mostly Ethiopia and the Chinese funded GERD project that MAY cause trouble for not only Egypt but Sudan as well.

Egypt is in particular vulnerable as the Nile is literally a question of life and death for Egypt.

The synchronizing of the Aswan High Dam with that of GERD is needed and apparently this is being worked on. As Ethiopia plans to fill the dam in three years, Egypt will receive less water downstream during that time. Therefore, both countries will have to make compromises. Egypt should fund the construction of transmission lines while Ethiopia should reduce the rate at which the dam fills.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom