What's new

Arvind Khejriwal resigned as Delhi CM !

That wasn't his only objective though, was it? He could have tried fixing the other problems and delivering on his other election promises. He had good 5 years ahead of him, what was the rush? He could have pursued and waited for couple more months and made sure that the bill went through while he was the CM.

What are the odds that him or his party will ever be back in power, what if he never comes back?

It was just a political move, a gamble, aimed at the Lok Sabha elections.

If I am not mistaken, you are implying what was the rush? My question to you would be why not? If i could add...... both swaraj, police accountibility for womens safety, and lokpal should have been introduced on the same time.
 
If I am not mistaken, you are implying what was the rush? My question to you would be why not? If i could add...... both swaraj, police accountibility for womens safety, and lokpal should have been introduced on the same time.


dont tell me there was a constitutional crisis... he was a matter of few technicalities...next time anything happens like this..does he again resign on such issues ?

3 advocates who were named by kejriwal had refused the same..
 
Absolutely we deserve leaders like shiela dikshit, Aklhilesh yadav, yeddurappa and like.... aboslutely.... Not a single member has raised why Congress and BJP voted against a strong anti graft bill??? wonder why?

Sir, first of all, not just Congress & BJP MPs but even the JDU & Independents voted against (the tabling) of the bill. They din't voted against the bill, but the way it was unconstitutionally tabled. We have a constitution, & weather AAP like it or not, it's govt. has taken oath to abide by it. Kejriwal is the person who is constantly talking about unconstitutional steps he wanna take, he once said that he will pass the lokpal bill at Jantar Mantar, now i m wondering what is Assembly for?? Yes you may dislike the politicians, but you have to atleast respect the Assembly & the Constitution of India. If a CM himself doesn't respect them, than only God can save India. BTW, what is he doing from day one of coming to power?? Giving freebies (that too only to his party workers), doing dharnas, giving Certificates of corruption to each & every person of India (who has given him the right to do that?? Is he a Judge??), he very well knew that it will be an unconstitutional step & needed a face savor to exit so that he can be seen as a martyr in the eyes of people of Delhi/India.

As for the Janlokpal bill is concerned...thank god someone has appealed to Delhi HC for it being Unconstitutional.....wait for it's decision, i hope you understand that BJP/Congress can't buy Delhi HC atleast.
 
yup bro an absolute honest man. . .

# a man who swore on his children to not to take support . . . yet he did.

# a man who shouted at the peak of his voice about reports against Sheila Dixit. . . . yet did nothing

# a man whose law minister is a internet spammer

# a man who did nothing but dharnas

# a man who used anna's movement as a tool. . and betrayed him later.

# a man who claimed to be an aam admi . . yet asking for two separate bungalows on sarkari kharcha

Wow!!

Support was taken by consent of the people of delhi.

CWG and Electricity - both are on CAG audit.

Betrayed Anna? what did congress or BJP do during the Anna movement, If you are satisfied with the lokpal bill brought about by Congress and endorsed by BJP, then Good.
Nothing further to discuss!
 
yup bro an absolute honest man. . .

# a man who swore on his children to not to take support . . . yet he did.

# a man who shouted at the peak of his voice about reports against Sheila Dixit. . . . yet did nothing

# a man whose law minister is a internet spammer

# a man who did nothing but dharnas

# a man who used anna's movement as a tool. . and betrayed him later.

# a man who claimed to be an aam admi . . yet asking for two separate bungalows on sarkari kharcha

Wow, is that all you have against him???? if we were to list the black deeds of politicians belonging to the corrupt congress and BJP parties we would run out of space on this forum.
 
If I am not mistaken, you are implying what was the rush? My question to you would be why not? If i could add...... both swaraj, police accountibility for womens safety, and lokpal should have been introduced on the same time.

I can understand the rush to introduce the bills, but I don't understand the rush to resign.

Had him and his party persisted the bill would have passed sooner or later, maybe in a month or two, as compared to atleast 6-8 months now, which is when the fresh elections will be held. That too mind you , if he is party does to come to power at all!

So do you still think he resigned on principle, and that he resigned because he wanted to implement these bills at the earliest?:rolleyes:
 
Wow!!

Support was taken by consent of the people of delhi.

CWG and Electricity - both are on CAG audit.

Betrayed Anna? what did congress or BJP do during the Anna movement, If you are satisfied with the lokpal bill brought about by Congress and endorsed by BJP, then Good.
Nothing further to discuss!

what support ???? AAP came second....isn't the mandate ??
 
Sir, first of all, not just Congress & BJP MPs but even the JDU & Independents voted against (the tabling) of the bill. They din't voted against the bill, but the way it was unconstitutionally tabled. We have a constitution, & weather AAP like it or not, it's govt. has taken oath to abide by it. Kejriwal is the person who is constantly talking about unconstitutional steps he wanna take, he once said that he will pass the lokpal bill at Jantar Mantar, now i m wondering what is Assembly for?? Yes you may dislike the politicians, but you have to atleast respect the Assembly & the Constitution of India. If a CM himself doesn't respect them, than only God can save India. BTW, what is he doing from day one of coming to power?? Giving freebies (that too only to his party workers), doing dharnas, giving Certificates of corruption to each & every person of India (who has given him the right to do that?? Is he a Judge??), he very well knew that it will be an unconstitutional step & needed a face savor to exit so that he can be seen as a martyr in the eyes of people of Delhi/India.

As for the Janlokpal bill is concerned...thank god someone has appealed to Delhi HC for it being Unconstitutional.....wait for it's decision, i hope you understand that BJP/Congress can't buy Delhi HC atleast.

How was the bill tabled unconstitutionally??? And how is the Janlokpal bill unconstitutional????
 
I would respectfully disagree.

Well legalities are right here for you refer to

http://delhiassembly.nic.in/constitution.htm


There is no wording the consititution where it says that governement cannot introduce any anti graft bill.....I am not making any assumption on your intellect, so I would request to you from refraining to adjudicate my gullibility.




(1)As from the date of commencement of the Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1991 the Union Territory of Delhi shall be called the National Capital Territory) and the administrator thereof appointed under article 239 shall be designated as the Lieutenant Governor.

(2) (a) There shall be a Legislative Assembly for the National Capital Territory of Delhi and the seats in such Assembly shall be filled by members chosen by direct election from territorial constituencies in the National Capital Territory.

(b) The total number of seats in the Legislative Assembly, the number of seats reserved for scheduled castes, the division of the National Capital Territory into territorial constituencies (including the basis for such division) and all other matters relating to the functioning of the Legislative Assembly shall be regulated by law made by Parliament.

(c)The provisions of articles 324 to 327 and 329 shall apply in relation to the National Capital Territory, the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory and the members thereof as they apply, in relation to a State, the Legislative Assembly of a State and the members thereof respectively and any reference in articles 326 and 329 to “appropriate Legislature” shall be deemed to be a reference to Parliament.

(3) (a) Subject to the provisions of the Constitution, the Legislative Assembly shall have power to make laws for the whole or any part of the National Capital Territory with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the State of List or in the Concurrent List in so far as any such matter is applicable to Union territories except matters with respect to Entries 1,2, and 18 of the State List and Entries 44, 65 and 66 of that List in so far as they relate to the said Entries 1,2,and 18.

(b)Nothing in sub-clause (a) shall derogate from the powers of Parliament under this constitution to make laws with respect to any matter for a Union Territory or any part thereof.

(c)If any provision of a law made by the Legislative Assembly with respect to any matter is repugnant to any provision of a law made by Parliament with respect to that matter, whether passed before or after the law made by the Legislative Assembly, or of an earlier law, other than a law made by the Legislative Assembly, then, in either case, the law made by Parliament, or , as the case may be, such earlier law, shall prevail and the law made by the Legislative Assembly shall, to the extent of the repugnancy, be void;



Provided that if any such law made by the Legislative Assembly has been reserved for the consideration of the President and has received his assent such law shall prevail in National Capital Territory ;

Provided further that nothing in this sub-clause shall prevent Parliament from enacting at any time any law with respect to the same matter including a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing the law so made by the Legislative Assembly.

(4) There shall be a Council of Ministers consisting of not more than ten percent, of the total number of members in the Legislative Assembly, with the Chief Minister at the head to aid and advise the Lieutenant Governor in the exercise to his functions in relation to matters with respect to which the Legislative Assembly has power to make laws, except in so far as he is, by or under any law, required to act in his discretion.

Provided that in the case of difference of opinion between the Lieutenant Governor and his Ministers on any matter, the Lieutenant Governor shall refer it to the President for decision and act according to the decision given thereon by the President and pending such decision it shall be competent for the Lieutenant Governor in any case where the matter, in his opinion, is so urgent that it is necessary for him to take immediate action, to take such action or to give such direction in the matter as he deems necessary.

(5)The Chief Minister shall be appointed by the President and the other Ministers shall be appointed by the President on the advice of the Chief Minister and the Ministers shall hold office during the pleasure of the President.

(6)The Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the Legislative Assembly.

(7) (a) Parliament may, by law, make provisions for giving effect to, or supplementing provisions contained in the foregoing clauses and for all matter incidental or consequential thereto .

* (b)Any such law as is referred to in sub-clause (a) shall not be deemed to be an amendment of this constitution for the purposes of article 368 not withstanding that it contains any provision which amends or has the effect of amending this constitution.

{*Inserted by section 3 of the Constitution (Seventieth Amendment) Act, 1992, (w.e.f 21-12-1991)}

(8)The Provisions of article 239 B shall, so far as may be, apply in relation to the National Capital Territory, the Lieutenant Governor and the Legislative Assembly, as they apply in relation to the Union Territory of Pondicherry, the administrator and its Legislature respectively; and any reference in that article to “clause (1) of article 239 A” shall be deemed to be a reference to this article or article 239 AB, as the case may be.

Sir, it's not about anti-graft or any other bill.............

The Law simply says that if there is ANY bill which has FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS can only be brought in the Assembly when LG approves it.
 
Sir, it's not about anti-graft or any other bill.............

The Law simply says that if there is ANY bill which has FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS can only be brought in the Assembly when LG approves it.
How does a anti graft bill has financial implications from Capital expenditure standpoint??? and is there any action in the real world that does not have financial implications???
 
For AAP absolutely? BJP did not get majority even if got the maximum votes? also BJP invited AAP to form the government and sit in the opp
how could BJP invite AAP to form Govt ??They voted against the AAP in assembly... it is about the principle you stand for...AAP betrayed the people by taking support from Congress...
 
Wow, is that all you have against him???? if we were to list the black deeds of politicians belonging to the corrupt congress and BJP parties we would run out of space on this forum.

All of that happened in two months. Given some more time, u would have got a lot more.

Add to that supporting Kasmiri separatism as well.
 
Wow!!

Support was taken by consent of the people of delhi.

CWG and Electricity - both are on CAG audit.

Betrayed Anna? what did congress or BJP do during the Anna movement, If you are satisfied with the lokpal bill brought about by Congress and endorsed by BJP, then Good.
Nothing further to discuss!
Wow, is that all you have against him???? if we were to list the black deeds of politicians belonging to the corrupt congress and BJP parties we would run out of space on this forum.

I don't care what what BJP or congress did. . . its the Aam Aadmi party who preach about muddon ki rajniti or a different version of rajniti. . . and if they also will behave like others. . then whats their credibility. . . ??? what makes them different from others ?
 
Back
Top Bottom