You are really a failure.
Poverty in US doesn't mean starvation or homeless. It is just below national average of income.
I know it doesn't mean starvation but are you seriously suggesting that anyone below $35,000 is considered under the poverty line in the US? Are you really that stupid?
The majority of the poor in the US are poor immigrant families/ minorities who have no little to access to healthcare, who live in temporary homes like trailers, who children drop out of school at an early age, etc etc which results in the vicious circle of poverty.
Also about homelessness, do you really want me to put up statistics about homelessness in the US, after the US recession which was primary caused by housing?
We are comparing China and India with income less than $1.25 per day. China's poverty is less than 10% and India poverty's at 40%. You pull in remark that US poverty is more than 10% which is "Relative poverty".
Please show me a neutral link that says that China's poverty is less than 10%. Not one, mind you, that takes the PRC as a source. Fact is, if China poverty rate was less than 10% it would not be classified as a developing country.
You again pull in useless comparison. Tocompare us to people like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates. Please compare apple to apple, orange to orange. I hope your school teacher had teached you this basic concept.
This argument was a result of your ridiculous definition of relative poverty.
Hitler is considered a war criminal and is Mao a war criminal? Hitler policy had invaded other country and resulted in mass killing of innocent people.
Mao is a mass murderer. The majority of people he killed were his own.
If we talk absolute numbers, yes Mao does put Hitler to shame.
Mao mistakes is not able to provide food for his people and resulted in people died of stalvation. He did not authorised mass killing by his solder.
No his mistakes were that he enacted domestic policies that resulted in the forced starvation of millions in China. His military expansionism that have left one million Tibetans dead and his completely low morals that had him supporting such a regime as the Khmer Rouge.
Not authorizing mass killings by his soldiers? Really? Pray tell me then how exactly did he defeat the counter revolutionary forces in China during the cultural revolution? by non violent Gandhian means?
Any country in the world recognize Tibet as Independent country?
I already answered this question - please enhance your ability to read. I can't keep repeating myself.
No,no country recognizes Tibet as an independent country. However,a lot of people in various nations certainly believe that Tibet should be free. My point is, if China continues its expansionist policies, India would need to rethink its position on Tibet.
South Tibet/AP is classified as disputed territory?
Claiming an area doesn't make the land a disputed territory. Atleast the Pakistanis have UN resolutions on Kashmir,pray tell me what resolutions does China have to back up the claim that AP is disputed internationally?
Honestly this discussion is pointless. Your failure to grasp points, your lack of reading skills, makes this exercise on my part redundant.