Arunachal Pradesh Students Lead Protests Against China For Renaming 6 Places

[Hindustani78]

Lol we have plenty of options to deal with India, it's India that ran out of option the best it can do it's play Dalai Lama card without getting any tangible result but CPEC is just kill India's dream for direct access to Afghanistan and Central Asia.

Indian Establishment has already made it clear that Dalai Lama is refugee and Dalai Lama has to return back and Chinese are the ones who are making Dalai Lama an issue and are linking it with the Border dispute talks .

Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Establishment is aware that Republic of India and other allies will defend Afghanistan Soverginity when its needed. Even the Russian Federation is aware about the attitude of Chinese over there.

These disputes are easy to deal with . India just give back South Tibet which has no relation with indian in culture ,history , bloodline.
If there's no British in indian continent, ROI would not exist .
Pls do not be the one who use to colonize you .
You have no capability of making these poor people living a better lives.
Just let them go.

In which world you live , awake up . Border dispute talks are on final stages between Republic of India and Chinese Government.

Regarding history and Culture then these are the facts.


Story of the stupa

Quoting Buddhist scriptures, a posting on www.nangchen.org said: “With the wish of spreading the teachings of the Buddha, King Ashoka of India divided the relics of Lord Buddha and constructed 84,000 stupas to enshrine these precious objects of devotion.”

In China, 19 of such stupas were constructed. However, most of them have collapsed due to natural wear and tear as well as human negligence. Some have been moved to other locations.

In the process of restoring some of these stupas, many relics of Lord Buddha and a huge amount of precious offering items were discovered. The stupa in Nangchen was one of these 19 archaic and precious structures of devotion.

“In history, Nangchen was an important centre of politics and trades in Eastern Tibet, and therefore it was also a very active centre for missionary activities. This explains why Ashoka chose Nangchen as one of the locations to build the reliquary stupa. In the later history, Nangchen too proved to be an extraordinary place for spreading Buddhism. With the support of the once—glorious Nangchen dynasty, this Buddhist kingdom had produced generations of Dharma kings, exemplary scholars and amazingly qualified monks, yogis and practitioners.


“Therefore Nangchen is also fondly known by great masters as Gomde or the ‘abode of meditators’ ”.IANS

Nangchen proved to be a good place for spreading Buddhism. With the support of Nangchen dynasty, the Buddhist kingdom had produced generations of Dharma kings, exemplary scholars and amazingly qualified monks, yogis and practitioners.

Tibet is not a disputed territory. Anarunchal, a recently made up name, is disputed. It's disputed because of British imperialism. India asked British to quit India. But continue British imperialism in the independent India. India need to quit South Tibet.

When China announced that it would be occupying Tibet, India sent a letter of protest proposing negotiations on the Tibet issue. China was even more active in deploying troops on the Aksai Chin border than any other Indian republic was.


Provisions of the Simla Conference in 1914, where representatives of British , China and Tibet initialed a Convention of which the chief provisions were the following:

Tibet was to be divided into two parts: Outer Tibet, adjoining India and including Lhasa, Shigatse and Chamdo; and Inner Tibet, including the provinces near China .

Sorry .
As you indian said , we China are a communism country .
As the biggest democratic country in the world, why doesn't india give its muslim people and minorities vote for independence ?

 

[faithfulguy]

Indian Establishment has already made it clear that Dalai Lama is refugee and Dalai Lama has to return back and Chinese are the ones who are making Dalai Lama an issue and are linking it with the Border dispute talks .

Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Establishment is aware that Republic of India and other allies will defend Afghanistan Soverginity when its needed. Even the Russian Federation is aware about the attitude of Chinese over there.



In which world you live , awake up . Border dispute talks are on final stages between Republic of India and Chinese Government.

Regarding history and Culture then these are the facts.


Story of the stupa

Quoting Buddhist scriptures, a posting on www.nangchen.org said: “With the wish of spreading the teachings of the Buddha, King Ashoka of India divided the relics of Lord Buddha and constructed 84,000 stupas to enshrine these precious objects of devotion.”

In China, 19 of such stupas were constructed. However, most of them have collapsed due to natural wear and tear as well as human negligence. Some have been moved to other locations.

In the process of restoring some of these stupas, many relics of Lord Buddha and a huge amount of precious offering items were discovered. The stupa in Nangchen was one of these 19 archaic and precious structures of devotion.

“In history, Nangchen was an important centre of politics and trades in Eastern Tibet, and therefore it was also a very active centre for missionary activities. This explains why Ashoka chose Nangchen as one of the locations to build the reliquary stupa. In the later history, Nangchen too proved to be an extraordinary place for spreading Buddhism. With the support of the once—glorious Nangchen dynasty, this Buddhist kingdom had produced generations of Dharma kings, exemplary scholars and amazingly qualified monks, yogis and practitioners.


“Therefore Nangchen is also fondly known by great masters as Gomde or the ‘abode of meditators’ ”.IANS

Nangchen proved to be a good place for spreading Buddhism. With the support of Nangchen dynasty, the Buddhist kingdom had produced generations of Dharma kings, exemplary scholars and amazingly qualified monks, yogis and practitioners.

When China announced that it would be occupying Tibet, India sent a letter of protest proposing negotiations on the Tibet issue. China was even more active in deploying troops on the Aksai Chin border than any other Indian republic was.


Provisions of the Simla Conference in 1914, where representatives of British , China and Tibet initialed a Convention of which the chief provisions were the following:

Tibet was to be divided into two parts: Outer Tibet, adjoining India and including Lhasa, Shigatse and Chamdo; and Inner Tibet, including the provinces near China .

does India recognize Tibet as part of China or recognize the Tibetan government in India as the legitimate government of Tibet

 

[Hindustani78]

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/chinas-claim-on-arunachal-baseless-bjp-4633108/
By: PTI | Itanagar | Published:April 29, 2017 3:34 pm
China’s claim on Arunachal Pradesh is baseless as it is an integral part of India, state BJP President Tapir Gao said today. “China’s claim is baseless. India has no boundary with China but with Tibet since China forcibly occupied Tibet in 1959 and they want to expand their boundary upto Arunachal which will not be accepted by the people of the state”, Gao told reporters.

Earlier, the party staged a protest rally here against renaming of six places in the state by China. They submitted a memorandum to Governor P B Acharya.

does India recognize Tibet as part of China or recognize the Tibetan government in India as the legitimate government of Tibet

Chinese have occupied Tibet and have even denied McMahon line and the dispute between Republic of India and Chinese Government is about the actual border line.

Indian Nation is more ancient and are aware of the actual borders of Indian nation which includes even Brahmaputra river. Dalai Lama came from Lhasa which is too far from Brahmaputra River.

 

[faithfulguy]

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/chinas-claim-on-arunachal-baseless-bjp-4633108/
By: PTI | Itanagar | Published:April 29, 2017 3:34 pm
China’s claim on Arunachal Pradesh is baseless as it is an integral part of India, state BJP President Tapir Gao said today. “China’s claim is baseless. India has no boundary with China but with Tibet since China forcibly occupied Tibet in 1959 and they want to expand their boundary upto Arunachal which will not be accepted by the people of the state”, Gao told reporters.

Earlier, the party staged a protest rally here against renaming of six places in the state by China. They submitted a memorandum to Governor P B Acharya.



Chinese have occupied Tibet and have even denied McMahon line and the dispute between Republic of India and Chinese Government is about the actual border line.

Indian Nation is more ancient and are aware of the actual borders of Indian nation which includes even Brahmaputra river. Dalai Lama came from Lhasa which is too far from Brahmaputra River.

Let's hear Modi state that Tibet is not part of China.

Also, McMahon is from the British empire. His claim is an imperialist claim. This is how India is a second hand imperialist.

India need to revert to its political entities prior to British arrival for Indians to be free. Otherwise, India will forever occupy by the British imperialism.

 

[Hindustani78]

Let's hear Modi state that Tibet is not part of China.

Also, McMahon is from the British empire. His claim is an imperialist claim. This is how India is a second hand imperialist.

India need to revert to its political entities prior to British arrival for Indians to be free. Otherwise, India will forever occupy by the British imperialism.

So how much old is the name Tibet ?

Tubo or Tufan "Tibet" is first recorded in the (945 CE) Old Book of Tang describing the Tibetan King Namri Songtsen (Gnam-ri-slon-rtsan) sent two emissaries to Emperor Yang of Sui in 608 and 609.'

Tibet, it means the areas covering Ü-Tsang and Western Kham, which became present-day the Tibet Autonomous Region, a provincial-level entity of the People's Republic. This definition excludes the former domains of the Dalai Lamas in Amdo and eastern Kham which are part of Qinghai, Gansu, Yunnan, and Sichuan.

In 1727, as a result of the Chinese having entered Lhasa, the boundary between China and Tibet was laid down as between the head-waters of the Mekong and Yangtse rivers, and marked by a pillar, a little to the south-west of Batang. Land to the west of this pillar was administered from Lhasa, while the Tibetan chiefs of the tribes to the east came more directly under China. This historical Sino-Tibetan boundary was used until 1910. The states Der-ge, Nyarong, Batang, Litang, and the five Hor States—to name the more important districts—are known collectively in Lhasa as Kham, an indefinite term suitable to the Tibetan Government, who are disconcertingly vague over such details as treaties and boundaries."

 

[faithfulguy]

So how much old is the name Tibet ?

Tubo or Tufan "Tibet" is first recorded in the (945 CE) Old Book of Tang describing the Tibetan King Namri Songtsen (Gnam-ri-slon-rtsan) sent two emissaries to Emperor Yang of Sui in 608 and 609.'

Tibet, it means the areas covering Ü-Tsang and Western Kham, which became present-day the Tibet Autonomous Region, a provincial-level entity of the People's Republic. This definition excludes the former domains of the Dalai Lamas in Amdo and eastern Kham which are part of Qinghai, Gansu, Yunnan, and Sichuan.

In 1727, as a result of the Chinese having entered Lhasa, the boundary between China and Tibet was laid down as between the head-waters of the Mekong and Yangtse rivers, and marked by a pillar, a little to the south-west of Batang. Land to the west of this pillar was administered from Lhasa, while the Tibetan chiefs of the tribes to the east came more directly under China. This historical Sino-Tibetan boundary was used until 1910. The states Der-ge, Nyarong, Batang, Litang, and the five Hor States—to name the more important districts—are known collectively in Lhasa as Kham, an indefinite term suitable to the Tibetan Government, who are disconcertingly vague over such details as treaties and boundaries."

Stop changing the topic. We are discussing how McMahon line is an example British imperialism. India need to revert to the border before the McMahon line. Otherwise, India is nothing more than a disgusting second hand imperialist. As a matter of fact, India political boundaries should revert to the year 1755.

 

[Hindustani78]

Stop changing the topic. We are discussing how McMahon line is an example British imperialism. India need to revert to the border before the McMahon line. Otherwise, India is nothing more than a disgusting second hand imperialist. As a matter of fact, India political boundaries should revert to the year 1755.

I am on topic only and trying to explain you that Indian nation is aware of the borders of India.

British were never interested for safeguarding the interest of Indian nation but were more to loot the Indian nation nor the British were interested about the holy sites of Indian nation. Indian nation knows the importance of the holy sites which are linked to the Indus Valley Civilization. Indian tribes under Marathas were aware of the invasion of ancient Indian lands and thats why Fakir sanyassi rebellion showed the unity of Indian nation.

 

[faithfulguy]

I am on topic only and trying to explain you that Indian nation is aware of the borders of India.

British were never interested for safeguarding the interest of Indian nation but were more to loot the Indian nation nor the British were interested about the holy sites of Indian nation. Indian nation knows the importance of the holy sites which are linked to the Indus Valley Civilization. Indian tribes under Marathas were aware of the invasion of ancient Indian lands and thats why Fakir sanyassi rebellion showed the unity of Indian nation.

Indian nation has its self aware from British India. Without Britain created India. India would still not exist as a single nation. As a matter in fact, if France, Neatherland or Portugal had won wars against the British, India would be like Africa today. There would be French, Portugese and Dutch speaking India states. They would be its own nation after independence as well.

 

[Hindustani78]

Indian nation has its self aware from British India. Without Britain created India. India would still not exist as a single nation. As a matter in fact, if France, Neatherland or Portugal had won wars against the British, India would be like Africa today. There would be French, Portugese and Dutch speaking India states. They would be its own nation after independence as well.

Britain has not created Indian nation , infact British , divided Indian provinces which let to the colonization of ancient Indian territories . Division of Bengal Province is the biggest example.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/world...ales-border/story-S4RSKEKMpaVrrTOauhnPAJ.html

The Chepstow Museum near the Wales-England border is holding a unique exhibition that features a garment lined inside with the ancient “Vrindavani Vastra” fabric identified with the 16th century Assamese saint, Sankardeva.

Chepstow Museum curator Anne Rainsbury with the unique garment with inner lining of Vrindavani Vastra fabric.(HT photo/ Prasun Sonwalkar)

This quiet, relaxed town at the confluence of rivers Wye and Severn is the unlikely home of a unique garment produced more than 450 years ago in colonial Calcutta with an inner fabric lining identified with the 16th century Assamese saint, Sankardeva.

Assam is over 8000 km away from here, but its sights, sounds and history have been attracting many at an exhibition titled “Hidden in the Lining: Krishna in the Garden of Assam” in the Chepstow Museum near the Wales-England border, particularly the garment lined inside with the ancient “Vrindavani Vastra” fabric.

The art of weaving Vrindavani Vastra associated with Sankardeva is extinct in Assam; few examples survive in collections around the world. The British Museum in London has a large example of 12 pieces sewn together, sourced from Tibet in the early 20th century.

The dimensions of the fabric were large, depicted tales mainly from Lord Krishna’s life, and included some verses of the iconic saint in ancient Assamese alphabets. It was produced under Sankardeva’s supervision and were once used as wall hangings in “satras” (monasteries).

But the use of the fabric as the lining of a garment (“banyan”) is unique. The garment was part of a Welsh family’s collection that was purchased by the Chepstow Rural Distinct Council in 1963. Its history and importance was only recently recognised.

Part of the Vrindavani Vastra inner lining depicting tales from Lord Krishna’s life. (HT photo/ Prasun Sonwalkar)
“We feel very privileged to be the custodians of this beautiful gown and its precious woven lining that has so much meaning and importance,” Anne Rainsbury, curator of Chepstow Museum, told Hindustan Times.

Experts believe that the garment was likely produced in colonial Calcutta. Assam is close to Calcutta and in the 18th century Chinese products were traded there for local use and onward transport to Europe.

It is most probably at Calcutta that the Chinese blue-green damask silk was put together with the Vrindavani Vastra inner lining. It is also likely that the tailor or maker may not have been literate or of the Hindu faith since in one part of the inner lining the fabric with Assamese verses and depicting Krishna tales is used upside down.

T Richard Blurton, head of South Asia at British Museum, told HT: “ I don’t know of any other example of lengths of Vrindavani Vastra-type textile being used in a garment. The Chepstow example is, I think, unique and its production must have been a one-off with no tradition of such things being established.”

The garment has been carefully preserved in the museum over the decades, using temperature control and soft folds. For long, the history of how the garment reached Monmouthshire in Wales remained unknown.

But new research by local historians has established a strong connection to the garment’s original ownership through the antiquarian Joseph Richard Cobb’s wife’s family. Emily Powys de Winton's grandfather, Jeffreys Wilkins, and her great uncle Walter Wilkins, both worked for the East India Company in the 18th century.

A verse in ancient Assamese alphabet in reverse in the garment’s sleeve. (HT photo/ Prasun Sonwalkar)

Walter Wilkins became the first governor of Chittagong in 1771 and returned to Wales the following year using the fortune he had made to buy Maesllwch Castle and estate.

Jeffreys Wilkins was an employee of the East India Company in Patna and joined his brother as partners in a new bank Wilkins & Co in 1778, also known as the Brecon Old Bank. They would have travelled via Calcutta and either brother could have been the original owner of the garment, local historians believe.

Rainsbury said: “We were delighted to be awarded a grant from the Textile Society to enable the conservation of the banyan – it was the Chinese silk damask, exposed to light and wear, that had suffered and become very fragile, but the inner lining is in excellent condition.”

“We hope that people will come not just to the exhibition, but to the series of events we have planned, and find out more not just about the textile, but Assamese culture, and links between India and Wales,” she added.

The exhibition until September includes Assam-related items from the British Museum and an animated film about Lord Krishna and a documentary on Assam. A group from London is scheduled to present a Bihu event at the museum on May 13, when the significance of the garment and its inner lining will also be highlighted.