What's new

Army's 'Cold Start' doctrine gets teeth

rajusri

BANNED
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
790
Reaction score
0
Army's 'Cold Start' doctrine gets teeth


Army's 'Cold Start' doctrine gets teeth
Ajai Shukla / New Delhi July 22, 2011, 0:44 IST

India’s ability to win a quick, pre-emptive war against Pakistan has been enhanced by a useful new set of teeth. This morning, at a missile test range in Balasore, Orissa, the Defence R&D Organisation (DRDO) launched its first-ever Prahaar missile, a mobile, truck-mounted rocket that can strike within 10 metres of a target 150 km away.

The Prahaar gives a huge boost to India’s ‘Cold Start’ military doctrine. This method of war would be adopted as retaliation for any grave Pakistani provocation, such as another 26/11 Mumbai-style terror attack. Cold Start involves multiple, simultaneous invasions of Pak territory with quickly assembled Indian Army battle groups, well before Pakistani forces can reach the border and occupy defensive positions. The Prahaar would provide the army’s invading battle groups with lethal fire support, striking Pakistani headquarters far behind the frontlines, and destroying roads, railways, bridges and other communications infrastructure that are essential for rushing Pak forces to the border.




Unlike the DRDO’s Prithvi missile, introduced into service as a 150-km range, nuclear-capable ballistic missile, the Prahaar is categorised as a ‘battlefield tactical missile’. Its maximum payload of 200 kg does not allow the Prahaar to carry a nuclear weapon (which are seldom under 500 kg). However, nuclear-capable ballistic missiles are useful only in the nightmarish eventuality of nuclear war; the Prahaar can be useful at every stage of a Cold Start campaign. Being a solid-fuel missile, it can swing into action quickly in response to rapidly evolving situations. And, its short flight time -- just 250 seconds or just over four minutes -- allows it to engage fleeting targets that would disappear in the time it would take to scramble and fly in fighter aircraft.

Further, the Prahaar’s range of warheads, which the DRDO has developed, gives the Indian Army multiple options. It could carry a cargo warhead containing bomblets that disperse over a wide area, killing any exposed troops. Alternatively, it could carry air-delivered mines, which spread across a piece of terrain, denying passage to enemy infantry or tanks. Or the Prahaar could carry a single, high-explosive warhead that can demolish even the best-protected target or critical infrastructure.

FREEING THE IAF
So far, many of these targets have fallen to the lot of the Indian Air Force. But in a Cold Start situation, the emphasis of the IAF, especially during the initial crucial days, would focus on attacking the Pak Air Force to prevent it from causing casualties in the Indian Army’s attacking battle groups or stopping their advance. By using the Prahaar against enemy entities beyond the range of artillery guns or rockets (30-40 km), or for interdicting enemy reserves and logistic columns far behind the lines, IAF fighters would be freed for “counter-air operations” against the PAF.

If, as is more than likely, the IAF buys the Prahaar in numbers, the missile could be effectively launched against forward Pakistani air bases, destroying fighters on the ground and damaging runways, air defence radars and air control networks. Currently, manned fighter aircraft perform these tasks, often at the cost of pilots’ lives and shot-down fighters.

Pakistan has no battlefield missile similar to the Prahaar. Over recent years, its scientists have focused on developing the Hatf-9 (or Nasr) short range, ballistic missile, which seeks to deter a Cold Start campaign with an ability to deliver a nuclear warhead to a maximum distance of 60 kms. Since most Indian cities are farther than that, strategists believe the Hatf-9 is intended for counter-force targeting, i.e. against one or more of the Indian Army’s integrated battle groups inside Pak territory. This would serve notice of Pakistani resolve to carry out a counter-value strike, which would take the form of a longer-range missile, carrying a nuclear warhead to one or more large Indian cities.

According to the DRDO, the Prahaar is comparable to the US Army’s Advanced Tactical Missile System, extensively used during the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The Prahaar is launched from a Road Mobile System developed by Larsen & Toubro, which can carry six missiles. All six can be fired in a salvo, each against a different target.

According to the DRDO, the Prahaar was developed in a period of just two years.
 
.
this cold start imo is just for show and not for use when your political leaders have no spines you might as well put the cold start into cold storage
 
.
this stupid ajay shukla doesnt know what is he writting..cant make a co-releation between a missle test and cold start..idiot

He his pea sized brain does not think that Pakistan also has the Nasr tactical nuke missle and instead of attacking India, Pakistan will chose to neutralize the India forces on Pakistani soil. A close source told me that intimidation of indian forces by a wave of mass annihilation and forcing them into mass surrender is the desired option. So Pakistan can also have its fair share of media psy-ops!

It looks like ajay shukla ate bad curry and had an episode of excessive farting. The gas has poisoned his brained..


Moron Ajay Shukla said:
Pakistan has no battlefield missile similar to the Prahaar. Over recent years, its scientists have focused on developing the Hatf-9 (or Nasr) short range, ballistic missile, which seeks to deter a Cold Start campaign with an ability to deliver a nuclear warhead to a maximum distance of 60 kms. Since most Indian cities are farther than that, strategists believe the Hatf-9 is intended for counter-force targeting, i.e. against one or more of the Indian Army’s integrated battle groups inside Pak territory. This would serve notice of Pakistani resolve to carry out a counter-value strike, which would take the form of a longer-range missile, carrying a nuclear warhead to one or more large Indian cities.

Ghaznavi Missile (Urdu: غزنوی میسایل) is a short range ballistic missile (SRBM) with an optimal range of 290 km,[1] produced by Pakistan and named after the 11th century Afghan conqueror Mahmud of Ghazni. The missile has a length of 9.64m, diameter of 0.99 m, launch weight of 5256 kg and is powered by a single stage solid fuel rocket motor.[2] It is believed to be based on a Chinese design, the M-11 (NATO reporting name: CSS-7).

Developed by Pakistan's National Development Complex (NDC), the Hatf IX Nasr has a range of 60 km [1] [3] and is carried by the same Chinese-origin 8x8 high mobility transporter erector launcher (TEL) as the Pakistan Army's AR-1A / A-100E 300mm Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS). The TEL platform appears to carry two missiles which are erected before launch and it is believed that the missile range could be extended.[4]

The diameter of the Nasr suggests that it is designed to carry a tactical nuclear warhead weighing less than 1 kg. This would be a boosted fission device using less than 1 kg of weapons grade plutonium, boosted with up to 4-5 grams of tritium. The resulting yield would be in the sub-kiloton range and would be suitable for battlefield use. A sophisticated nuclear trigger mechanism would also be required.[4]

Looks like there is no shortage if stupids like these in india..the question is about Pakistan and he is bragging about China.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
this stupid ajay shukla doesnt know what is he writting..cant make a co-releation between a missle test and cold start..idiot

and ur stupid nassr test was showing to blast the indian cold start.............:azn:
so y cant we??
 
.
i dont understand..it doesnt help cold start doctorine in anyway?? ..it can be useful as an defense weapon..is india feeling threatned that Pakistan is coming up with cold start doctrine!!(obviously not so its just a show off)
 
.
this stupid ajay shukla doesnt know what is he writting..cant make a co-releation between a missle test and cold start..idiot

He his pea sized brain does not think that Pakistan also has the Nasr tactical nuke missle and instead of attacking India, Pakistan will chose to neutralize the India forces on Pakistani soil. A close source told me that intimidation of indian forces by a wave of mass annihilation and forcing them into mass surrender is the desired option. So Pakistan can also have its fair share of media psy-ops!

It looks like ajay shukla ate bad curry and had an episode of excessive farting. The gas has poisoned his brained..




Ghaznavi Missile (Urdu: غزنوی میسایل) is a short range ballistic missile (SRBM) with an optimal range of 290 km,[1] produced by Pakistan and named after the 11th century Afghan conqueror Mahmud of Ghazni. The missile has a length of 9.64m, diameter of 0.99 m, launch weight of 5256 kg and is powered by a single stage solid fuel rocket motor.[2] It is believed to be based on a Chinese design, the M-11 (NATO reporting name: CSS-7).

Developed by Pakistan's National Development Complex (NDC), the Hatf IX Nasr has a range of 60 km [1] [3] and is carried by the same Chinese-origin 8x8 high mobility transporter erector launcher (TEL) as the Pakistan Army's AR-1A / A-100E 300mm Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS). The TEL platform appears to carry two missiles which are erected before launch and it is believed that the missile range could be extended.[4]

The diameter of the Nasr suggests that it is designed to carry a tactical nuclear warhead weighing less than 1 kg. This would be a boosted fission device using less than 1 kg of weapons grade plutonium, boosted with up to 4-5 grams of tritium. The resulting yield would be in the sub-kiloton range and would be suitable for battlefield use. A sophisticated nuclear trigger mechanism would also be required.[4]

Looks like there is no shortage if stupids like these in india..the question is about Pakistan and he is bragging about China.


Too much frustrated! :rofl:


What is wrong with this guy? Always posting contradicting , frustrated and bashing post!



Pakistan also has the Nasr tactical nuke missle and instead of attacking India, Pakistan will chose to neutralize the India forces on Pakistani soil. A close source told me that intimidation of indian forces by a wave of mass annihilation and forcing them into mass surrender is the desired option.

pakistan will use Nasr if it survive and about surrendering India does not know what it is but you do. lol if nasr and similar types are fired we have many options to tackle them.


Iron Dome
1.jpg


Devid's Sling
300px-David_sling_missile.jpg


SPYDER
spyder_7.jpg


AAD
p2.jpg



we you have to overcome all these and that is impossible.
 
.
this stupid by me. I dont know what I am writting..cant make a co-releation between a missle test and cold start..idiot

My pea sized brain does not think that Pakistan also has the Nasr tactical nuke missle and instead of attacking India, Pakistan will chose to neutralize the India forces on Pakistani soil. A close source told me that intimidation of indian forces by a wave of mass annihilation and forcing them into mass surrender is the desired option. So Pakistan can also have its fair share of media psy-ops!

It looks like I am ate bad curry and had an episode of excessive farting. The gas my poisoned his brained..




Ghaznavi Missile (Urdu: غزنوی میسایل) is a short range ballistic missile (SRBM) with an optimal range of 290 km,[1] produced by Pakistan and named after the 11th century Afghan conqueror Mahmud of Ghazni. The missile has a length of 9.64m, diameter of 0.99 m, launch weight of 5256 kg and is powered by a single stage solid fuel rocket motor.[2] It is believed to be based on a Chinese design, the M-11 (NATO reporting name: CSS-7).

Developed by Pakistan's National Development Complex (NDC), the Hatf IX Nasr has a range of 60 km [1] [3] and is carried by the same Chinese-origin 8x8 high mobility transporter erector launcher (TEL) as the Pakistan Army's AR-1A / A-100E 300mm Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS). The TEL platform appears to carry two missiles which are erected before launch and it is believed that the missile range could be extended.[4]

The diameter of the Nasr suggests that it is designed to carry a tactical nuclear warhead weighing less than 1 kg. This would be a boosted fission device using less than 1 kg of weapons grade plutonium, boosted with up to 4-5 grams of tritium. The resulting yield would be in the sub-kiloton range and would be suitable for battlefield use. A sophisticated nuclear trigger mechanism would also be required.[4]

Looks like there is no shortage if stupids like these in Pakistan..the question is about Pakistan and he is bragging about China.

Now correct. Read it you will find it well. :rofl: :rofl:
 
.
this stupid ajay shukla doesnt know what is he writting..cant make a co-releation between a missle test and cold start..idiot

He his pea sized brain does not think that Pakistan also has the Nasr tactical nuke missle and instead of attacking India, Pakistan will chose to neutralize the India forces on Pakistani soil. A close source told me that intimidation of indian forces by a wave of mass annihilation and forcing them into mass surrender is the desired option. So Pakistan can also have its fair share of media psy-ops!

It looks like ajay shukla ate bad curry and had an episode of excessive farting. The gas has poisoned his brained..




Ghaznavi Missile (Urdu: غزنوی میسایل) is a short range ballistic missile (SRBM) with an optimal range of 290 km,[1] produced by Pakistan and named after the 11th century Afghan conqueror Mahmud of Ghazni. The missile has a length of 9.64m, diameter of 0.99 m, launch weight of 5256 kg and is powered by a single stage solid fuel rocket motor.[2] It is believed to be based on a Chinese design, the M-11 (NATO reporting name: CSS-7).

Developed by Pakistan's National Development Complex (NDC), the Hatf IX Nasr has a range of 60 km [1] [3] and is carried by the same Chinese-origin 8x8 high mobility transporter erector launcher (TEL) as the Pakistan Army's AR-1A / A-100E 300mm Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS). The TEL platform appears to carry two missiles which are erected before launch and it is believed that the missile range could be extended.[4]

The diameter of the Nasr suggests that it is designed to carry a tactical nuclear warhead weighing less than 1 kg. This would be a boosted fission device using less than 1 kg of weapons grade plutonium, boosted with up to 4-5 grams of tritium. The resulting yield would be in the sub-kiloton range and would be suitable for battlefield use. A sophisticated nuclear trigger mechanism would also be required.[4]

Looks like there is no shortage if stupids like these in india..the question is about Pakistan and he is bragging about China.


and if Pakistan does use nukes on our forces we will respond with strategic nukes 200kt yield Agni 1 and 2 missiles and Prthvi missiles in other words go and see minimum credible deterrence and the odds are against Pakistan in that scenario once when INS Arihant enters service it won't just be sitting in some dock in Mumbai but will be deep below the Arabian sea waiting for orders


this is the reality of Indian missile technology take a look


 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
i dont understand..it doesnt help cold start doctorine in anyway?? ..it can be useful as an defense weapon..
No , it is not defensive weapons but offensive. High accuracy and all terrain launcher mean it will attack enemy behind the like precisely and destroying enemy defences to make road for armour formation.


is india feeling threatned that Pakistan is coming up with cold start doctrine!!(obviously not so its just a show off)
pakistan needs $ 50 billion to come up with a cold start doctrine. it needs large air lifting , lighter weapons and self defence system like mobile quick reaction air defence systems.
 
.
i dont understand..it doesnt help cold start doctorine in anyway?? ..it can be useful as an defense weapon..is india feeling threatned that Pakistan is coming up with cold start doctrine!!(obviously not so its just a show off)

Simple : 65 % of Pakistan Landmass including major cities and capital is within striking distance with a missile having a range of 150 KM. How can you call this a defensive weapon.
 
.
i dont understand..it doesnt help cold start doctorine in anyway?? ..it can be useful as an defense weapon..is india feeling threatned that Pakistan is coming up with cold start doctrine!!(obviously not so its just a show off)

.....actually they are trying to cover up the failure of cold star doctrine... they know its a fail strategy they have been asked to believe for decades...
 
.
i dont understand..it doesnt help cold start doctorine in anyway?? ..it can be useful as an defense weapon..is india feeling threatned that Pakistan is coming up with cold start doctrine!!(obviously not so its just a show off)

Actually it does. Cold start doctrine requires quick occupation of enemy territory. The role fulfilled by the Prahaar missile was earlier the domain of IAF. In the event of cold start, the inter operability of the forces may compromise the speed of theoperation.The prahaar missile allows the army to take a lot of the battlefield decisions under it's own purview without depending on the IAF.
 
. .
No , it is not defensive weapons but offensive. High accuracy and all terrain launcher mean it will attack enemy behind the like precisely and destroying enemy defences to make road for armour formation.



pakistan needs $ 50 billion to come up with a cold start doctrine. it needs large air lifting , lighter weapons and self defence system like mobile quick reaction air defence systems.

india has huge range of offensive weapons..such short range blastic missles have only one purpose to target a huge moving infantary vechiles with a small tactical nuke small enough not to enrage nuclear war especially if its used ON YOUR OWN SOIL

its too expensive to be operated fro classical non nuclear style..they are many much cheaper ways to target an enemy..e.g through stand off glide bombs of airforce..
india would have needed it if it had not a power air force and was afraid a nation might invade it..
it could be possible answer to risk for a chinese war..but for pakistan any logical person would agree it changes nothing..
 
.
well it doesnt matter whether its in what range its still an expensive method to hit an enmey when you have plateforms..
pakistan already has abdali with 150-180km and ghaznvi with 250-290km and nasr with 60-100km as well as htf-1 with 100 km range

the thing about nasr was its ability to be launched from 8x8 TEL vechile or in Pakistan army a samll truck with 2X2 laucher..easily lauched quickly..
purpose is to over come limited strike ability by using either conventional or less than 1kt of tnt yield nuclear weapons with blast radius of less than 500 meters and very little radiations fall out
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom