karan.1970
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2010
- Messages
- 14,781
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
Thanks for an honest analysis. For a while, I thought India can do no wrong.
Hey.. a Spade is a Spade..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for an honest analysis. For a while, I thought India can do no wrong.
I expect Arjun to be exported if Indian army doesn't order more tanks. Arjun is a good tank no doubt. Its armour is up there comparable to the best in the world. There are no issues with its mobility, turret, engine. It is a quality tank, just a little too late. Anyways, there are a lot of countries looking to replace their old tanks.
Lets wait and see what happens.
this is the exact mentality that lead to the failure of Agni-3.
this is the exact person who claimed india's anti-missile tech is better than China's when india didn't have any mid course anti missile and does not have any target missile that can be used for such test.
i dont know about arjun as not a tank man but there shouldn't be any complains against INSAS its made on israeli design which intern is a highly modified and improved ak47 , now the main advantage of INSAS and its israeli counterpart is that they SHOULD not go wrong or must be Glitch free and they do not involve any rocket science to make that some thing will go wrong so i think on that issue i am with DRDO that any problems might be local one rather then some thing being wrong with the rifle , it should be a very potent Gun if its made the way it should be .No rethink on Arjun tank: DRDO chief
The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) dispelled apprehensions that there was a question mark over the capability of the indigenously manufactured Arjun tank.
Speaking at a press conference here on Saturday, DRDO chief V.K. Saraswat dismissed reports that the tank was undergoing yet another series of revaluations vis-À-vis the Russian T-90 main battle tanks.
Dr. Saraswat said that half of the 124 tanks ordered by the Army had already rolled out, and there was no rethink about their induction. The comparative evaluation referred to in media reports was nothing but a trial of the tanks role in the overall arsenal of the Army. It is a normal process of identifying the role the tank will play in the plans, he said.
Let me make it clear, that these are not evaluation trials of the Arjun tank, as those trials, including in summer and winter months, are over and more than 50 per cent of the tanks have now rolled out of the factory for induction.
Dr. Saraswat also refuted criticism about the performance of made-in-India INSAS (Indian Small Arms System) rifles. He said there were no niggles in the INSAS rifle, a standard issue to the infantry and the paramilitary forces, and felt the complaints, if any, must be local in nature. The feedback from the Army indicated that the troops were satisfied with the rifle.
He said the integration of avionics and sensors on a Brazilian plane to produce an indigenous eye-in-the-sky was proceeding apace. The modifications of the Embraer aircraft to fit the surveillance systems were in fairly good shape and the AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System) could be ready for tests in two years, he said.
No rethink on Arjun tank: DRDO chief
this is the exact mentality that lead to the failure of Agni-3.
this is the exact person who claimed india's anti-missile tech is better than China's when india didn't have any mid course anti missile and does not have any target missile that can be used for such test.
he gets banned on weekly basis..no need to reply him..