What's new

Arjun MK-2 tanks facing Smokey driver chamber in latest tests

mmmm

GSLV-D5 set for July launch
April 22, 2013 | Rhik Kundu , TNN
BANGALORE: Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) will go ahead with the launch of a Geo-synchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV-D5) in July, said K Radhakrishnan, the chairman of the country's space agency. The GSLV-D5, which will carry an indigenous cryogenic engine, will be a renewed attempt from ISRO after the launch of a GSLV-D3 (with an indigenous cryogenic engine) in April 2010 ended in failure. "The previous seven flights of the GSLV have indicated several small issues.

You guys need 4 decades to assemble world smallest combat aircraft. Copying the engine was probably a long way... You guys love issues with everything. But proclaim to be the best. Let us call it a day. Boring already.

Hahaha :lol: :lol: :lol: Four decades?Assemble?.....:lol:

Copying an engine???? Haha do you even know basics of such things?? :lol:

smoke or fire...

Cryogenics, the science of extreme low temperatures, has been a tricky one for rocket scientists across the world.
"At stake was a 300 billon dollar space research and applications industry which was in the hands of five nations — the US, France, China, Russia, and Japan. Almost every major country wanted to put its own satellites in the orbit and they could do it only with the help of these five nations,'' says J Rajashekaran Nair, who authored Spies from Space: The ISRO Frame-up .
In 1992, India signed an agreement with Russia for transfer of technology to develop cryogenic-based fuels. The agreement was signed for Rs 235 crore, when the US and France were offering the same technology for Rs 950 crore and Rs 650 crore respectively. "Documents show that US president George Bush (Sr) wrote to Russia, raising objections against this agreement and even threatening to blacklist the country from the select-five club,'' Rajashekaran says.
Russia, under Boris Yelstin, succumbed to the pressure and denied cryogenic technology to India. To bypass this monopoly, India signed a new agreement with Russia to fabricate four cryogenic engines after floating a global tender without a formal transfer of technology.'
Isro had already reached a consensus with Kerala High Tech Industries Limited (Keltch) which would have provided the cheapest tender for fabricating engines .

Read the bolded part first,they denied technology,we developed for our own.
And some more bits...

ecember 27, 2010 | Arun Ram , TNN
CHENNAI: Isro is staring at a crisis: it is left with just one Russia-made cryogenic engine and its indigenous version is far from ready. The launch of communication satellites weighing more than 2 tonnes into a geosynchronous transfer orbit, besides India's ambitious space programmes such as Chandrayaan-2 and the manned mission, need Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicles ( GSLV ) powered partly by cryogenic engines. The cryogenic engine that went up in flames with GSLV-F06 on Saturday was the sixth of the seven such engines the country had procured from Russia.

The issue is not Kalam but the fact that you keep shouting that Indians made/invented something...

Google GSLV mk 1 &gslv mk 2...
 
lolzzzz i guess the hafizzzzz is back with a differnet name lolzzz

any way to be on topic the thread was about smoke in driving chamber of arjun MK2 and here are pakistani fanboys trying hard to redecule the hard work dedication and achievnments on indian scientist in field of space techniology , defence nad what not

looks like pakistanies will never be able to come owt of there so called 'superiorty complex' aganist indians which in turning into an acute form of 'obsession' & 'Ehsaas E kamtari'

since there own effort of stealing tech from world over is parelled onli by there new "all weather freinds" they are happy to sing there praises like a 'khwajasarah' and often make themselfs as a laughing stalk of the world

and when all that dint brought the expected results they are now trying hard to make look indian efort like they are batered in this dept. too by indians ...what do you call it slave mindset or submission of defeat
 
And you are watching many flaws getting rectified with,mk2 variant,and it would continue.

Lol... first induct the supa dopa arjun mk-2 (version of the failed mk-1)... :lol: ... with which ur still strugglin!

And 'debunked'?by whom? he-man guy??:lol:

Hahha .. he just quoted ur own media..


Here you go,R & D takes time,but it pays off in long term-For example the turbofan,engine for Nirbhay was developed by HAL,making use of experience of designing engines like HJE 2500 in 60s and PTAE 7 in 90s(And what an irony,I am explaining this to a guy who thinks that Pakistan made a miniature turbofan for a CM with no prior experience in gas turbines)


The only country tht needs seperate turbofan (Failed or under developmen) engines... while boasting abt one in service n "super sonic" indian painted yakhont!... as for turbofan on Babur.. lol a source would help... or have u seen it? (in ur dreams or in ur "blogs").. :lol:

Finished project?Check out Agni IV & V,Shaurya,Prahar,Akash,ATV and many more.

Add katrina kaif to the list.. (atleast shes hot :D )

And you are making fun,of Indian Ramjet powered LRCM?Can Pakistan make one?

Lmao.. sunny we sure do.. thts why raad n babur are in service n not CGIs like LRCM .. or most of indian weapons..

And Yakhont and Brahmos are not same,I ve seen,many Indian,members answering this ridiculous claim of yours a million times here.


Oh yeah the "software" makes it a new missile.. :lol:

No wonder india tried pushing the "advanced" Brahmos up russian navys throat yet failed .... why? coz they already have yakhonts operational on their ships... same goes for the Vietnamese..


And here he goes,showing his ignorance once again-a missile with,'little quasi ballistic tranectory'.?



Oh no sorry sir.. its a ballistic cruise missile.. :lol:
Oh yes I admit,it would only go 750 km for a 1 tonne payload or 180 kg payload,happy now?? :lol: Do you even know what RVs are used on Shaurya?


And again claims of 'russian help?' In which area of missile technology,Mr Genius?

:rofl: Quote your "proof" here n read it urself u will get answers to both of ur questions...


Cool story ... did u read tht post? NO! :lol:
https://defence.pk/threads/who-exports-more-weapons-india-or-pakistan.52684/page-4#post-4901952

Sure... whatever makes u happy mr dikshit.. :D



U
can launch a sat but cant assemble a tank? lmao.


Your think brain wont accept anything:

(Kyodo) _ Pakistan has decided to embark on the indigenous manufacture of 300-megawatt commercial nuclear power plants to meet growing energy needs, reliable official sources have said.

They said Pakistan decided to go for indigenous manufacture of commercial nuclear power plants because of the poor response of the United States and the Nuclear Supplier Group to requests for help in the civilian nuclear energy program on the pattern of the 2004 India-U.S. nuclear deal.

"We have taken many steps and more are on the anvil to start indigenous manufacture of 300-MW pressurized water reactor," the sources said.

They pointed out that an Engineering and Design Organization has been set up to design and develop a standard for indigenous nuclear power plants and privatization of the Chinese-aided Heavy Mechanical Complex, or HMC, was reversed by the government when it was pointed out that Pakistan was capable of manufacturing components for nuclear power plants.

HMC can manufacture several key components of thermal power plants which could also be used in the nuclear power plants and Pakistan has also set up HMC-3 exclusively to contribute in the indigenous nuclear power plants.

Official sources pointed out that Pakistan's "Energy Security Plan" envisaged 8,500 MW of nuclear energy by 2030, which would require setting up 22 nuclear power plants of 300-mw capacity if the target is to be met.

"Sites for eight nuclear power plants have already been selected," the official said and indicated that a consortium of private and public industrial units would be set up to undertake manufacture of the nuclear power plants.

Pakistan has set up a 300-MW nuclear power plant at Chashma (Chashnupp-1) in the Mianwali district in southern Punjab with Chinese assistance and a second plant is under construction at the same site.

Although Chashnupp-1 and 2 were turnkey contracts, Pakistan contributed up to 70 percent of their components.

"No country can manufacture a nuclear power plant 100 percent all by itself. We cannot produce reactor shells, several pumps and the pressure vessels for which we will have to develop additional capacity or enter into a licensing agreement," an official said.


:lol:
 
Lol... first induct the supa dopa arjun mk-2 (version of the failed mk-1)... :lol: ... with which ur still strugglin!



Hahha .. he just quoted ur own media..





The only country tht needs seperate turbofan (Failed or under developmen) engines... while boasting abt one in service n "super sonic" indian painted yakhont!... as for turbofan on Babur.. lol a source would help... or have u seen it? (in ur dreams or in ur "blogs").. :lol:



Add katrina kaif to the list.. (atleast shes hot :D )



Lmao.. sunny we sure do.. thts why raad n babur are in service n not CGIs like LRCM .. or most of indian weapons..




Oh yeah the "software" makes it a new missile.. :lol:

No wonder india tried pushing the "advanced" Brahmos up russian navys throat yet failed .... why? coz they already have yakhonts operational on their ships... same goes for the Vietnamese..






Oh no sorry sir.. its a ballistic cruise missile.. :lol:


:rofl: Quote your "proof" here n read it urself u will get answers to both of ur questions...



Cool story ... did u read tht post? NO! :lol:


Sure... whatever makes u happy mr dikshit.. :D



U can launch a sat but cant assemble a tank? lmao.



Your think brain wont accept anything:

(Kyodo) _ Pakistan has decided to embark on the indigenous manufacture of 300-megawatt commercial nuclear power plants to meet growing energy needs, reliable official sources have said.

They said Pakistan decided to go for indigenous manufacture of commercial nuclear power plants because of the poor response of the United States and the Nuclear Supplier Group to requests for help in the civilian nuclear energy program on the pattern of the 2004 India-U.S. nuclear deal.

"We have taken many steps and more are on the anvil to start indigenous manufacture of 300-MW pressurized water reactor," the sources said.

They pointed out that an Engineering and Design Organization has been set up to design and develop a standard for indigenous nuclear power plants and privatization of the Chinese-aided Heavy Mechanical Complex, or HMC, was reversed by the government when it was pointed out that Pakistan was capable of manufacturing components for nuclear power plants.

HMC can manufacture several key components of thermal power plants which could also be used in the nuclear power plants and Pakistan has also set up HMC-3 exclusively to contribute in the indigenous nuclear power plants.

Official sources pointed out that Pakistan's "Energy Security Plan" envisaged 8,500 MW of nuclear energy by 2030, which would require setting up 22 nuclear power plants of 300-mw capacity if the target is to be met.

"Sites for eight nuclear power plants have already been selected," the official said and indicated that a consortium of private and public industrial units would be set up to undertake manufacture of the nuclear power plants.

Pakistan has set up a 300-MW nuclear power plant at Chashma (Chashnupp-1) in the Mianwali district in southern Punjab with Chinese assistance and a second plant is under construction at the same site.

Although Chashnupp-1 and 2 were turnkey contracts, Pakistan contributed up to 70 percent of their components.

"No country can manufacture a nuclear power plant 100 percent all by itself. We cannot produce reactor shells, several pumps and the pressure vessels for which we will have to develop additional capacity or enter into a licensing agreement," an official said.

:lol:

Relax chump, the fact is it is getting ready, and no matter what you say it will be inducted.
At least we have something of our own which is more than what I can say for the green painted chinese MBT-2000s.

LOL what do ya'll understand, Pak cannot even send a satellite on their own let alone a turbofan engine. HA.

And of course you will joke since you have no come back for our successful missile projects, which is why you are only seen trolling in threads which show our setback. Enjoy denial.

LOL first make a turbofan engine before hoping to make a ramjet engine.

Can Yakhont do a supersonic dive, is Yakhont programmed to hit land based targets in a cluster situation, can a yakhont be launched from underwater, can yakhont be air-launched.
Enjoy pondering on that.

You condescend about something yet you know cinch about it.
Go research hypersonic test vehicles, ballistic missiles with cruising abilities are the norm of the future.

Oh no, we can launch a Sat and develop a tank whereas you all can do neither.
 
Lol... first induct the supa dopa arjun mk-2 (version of the failed mk-1)... :lol: ... with which ur still strugglin!

Haha failed Arjun 1?Its already inducted & mk 2 would be what IA asked for.
The only country tht needs seperate turbofan (Failed or under developmen) engines... while boasting abt one in service n "super sonic" indian painted yakhont!... as for turbofan on Babur.. lol a source would help... or have u seen it? (in ur dreams or in ur "blogs").. :lol:

Haha showing typical @DESERT FIGHTER IQ..:lol: :lol:

Brahmos uses a turbofan?Thats joke of the year 2013!!!

Mr genius,Brahmos uses a Russian ramjet engine ( you knoe what that is? )
We have indigenous ramjet on Akash SAM,and on LRCM ( 2014 ).Even a Scramjet is under ground test ( by both ISRO & DRDO )

And apply same logic to you,So can pakistan replace RD 33 on JF 17 with babur one??

We have developed our own jet engines-HJE 2500,GTX 35,GTX 37,GTX 37 UB as TDs.
And PTAE 7 in Lakshya,Laghu Shakti on Nirbhay andKaveri for IUSAV/AMCA as production models.

And show me an institute like HALs ETBRC and GTRE,that can design an aero engine?
Show me what experience you have in gas turbines.?
Show me the designation & specification for one on Babur,if you have.



Add katrina kaif to the list.. (atleast shes hot :D )

What?Did you ran out of BS?
Got to say anything about ATV,Agni V,Shaurya,Akash??
Lmao.. sunny we sure do.. thts why raad n babur are in service n not CGIs like LRCM .. or most of indian weapons..

Haha show your ignorance.
Can pakistan,make a supersonic LRCM? no !
A ramjet? No way.

Oh yes Indian weapons are just 'CAD models'.Huh troll,we have been developing our own SLVs,missiles,jet fighters & trainers long before computer aided drafting and modelling was even developed.

The Ramjet engines are already on Service ( Akash SAM ) andLRCM would be test fired in 2014.

And Pakistan doesnt need CAD models,as it buys components from Chinese-RLGs,materials for heat shields,alloys.

Oh yeah the "software" makes it a new missile.. :lol:

No wonder india tried pushing the "advanced" Brahmos up russian navys throat yet failed .... why? coz they already have yakhonts operational on their ships... same goes for the Vietnamese..

Check @bloo s post & think about it.
And do you know that Russia has a policy of buying locally made weapons,only,and Brahmos turned out to be too costly for Vietnamese?


Oh no sorry sir.. its a ballistic cruise missile.. :lol:

Try learning about Shaped trajectory systems,or at least go study some basic physics.

:rofl: Quote your "proof" here n read it urself u will get answers to both of ur questions...

The joke of the year...Pakistan can design their own missiles...but India need help..In which field??

Oops sorry its pakistan that needs help...in many fields.


Learn what 'ultra large forging is',and see that table too.

Heavy Manufacturing of Power Plants


No such facilities is in Pakistan.



Sure... whatever makes u happy mr dikshit.. :D

:lol: More delusions from pdf expert...
Even the launchpads arent ready,let alone the SLV,there is no mention of it at Suparco website.

You are 35 years behind us in this...and counting.


U
can launch a sat but cant assemble a tank? lmao.

We can develop a tank & launch a sat,can you??

Your think brain wont accept anything:

(Kyodo) _ Pakistan has decided to embark on the indigenous manufacture of 300-megawatt commercial nuclear power plants to meet growing energy needs, reliable official sources have said.

They said Pakistan decided to go for indigenous manufacture of commercial nuclear power plants because of the poor response of the United States and the Nuclear Supplier Group to requests for help in the civilian nuclear energy program on the pattern of the 2004 India-U.S. nuclear deal.

"We have taken many steps and more are on the anvil to start indigenous manufacture of 300-MW pressurized water reactor," the sources said.

They pointed out that an Engineering and Design Organization has been set up to design and develop a standard for indigenous nuclear power plants and privatization of the Chinese-aided Heavy Mechanical Complex, or HMC, was reversed by the government when it was pointed out that Pakistan was capable of manufacturing components for nuclear power plants.

HMC can manufacture several key components of thermal power plants which could also be used in the nuclear power plants and Pakistan has also set up HMC-3 exclusively to contribute in the indigenous nuclear power plants.

Official sources pointed out that Pakistan's "Energy Security Plan" envisaged 8,500 MW of nuclear energy by 2030, which would require setting up 22 nuclear power plants of 300-mw capacity if the target is to be met.

"Sites for eight nuclear power plants have already been selected," the official said and indicated that a consortium of private and public industrial units would be set up to undertake manufacture of the nuclear power plants.

Pakistan has set up a 300-MW nuclear power plant at Chashma (Chashnupp-1) in the Mianwali district in southern Punjab with Chinese assistance and a second plant is under construction at the same site.

Although Chashnupp-1 and 2 were turnkey contracts, Pakistan contributed up to 70 percent of their components.

"No country can manufacture a nuclear power plant 100 percent all by itself. We cannot produce reactor shells, several pumps and the pressure vessels for which we will have to develop additional capacity or enter into a licensing agreement," an official said.


:lol:

Huh,So,what you claim as Indigenous 300 Mw reactors are Chinese design made in Pakistan & 150 MW,ones are CANDU.If these are pakistani,WVER 1000 is Indian-as it has more local produced components than any pakistani,made reactors.

And only indigenous design is 50 MW research rea,tor at Khushab.

And do you even know what is 'development of specifications'?

And see this.

' We cannot produce reactor shells, several pumps and the pressure vessels for which we will have to develop additional capacity or enter into a licensing agreement '

This proves my point,Pressure vessels are produced by ultra heavy forging facilities that Pakistan doesnt have,and no Pakistani company can produce pumps required.

In India we have Ultra heavy forging for reactor vessels ( Check my phwr thread) & kirloskar and like make pumps required.

And you claim,that WVER 1000 is assembled here?
 
Designing & building a tank up to customer expectations is not an easy task. It wont simply get completed, just like 3years for design work, 7years for development.

Our company is designing & Manufacturing various telecom products, our R&D team have only engineers from reputed IITs across the country. Still we have bugs to fix, even on 10year old products. Products which is in production will even have bugs & issues. Our company built MPLS-TP n/w for a reputed service provider in Malaysia, which came to us after Huawei failed to satisfy customer expectations. our company took the project and implemented successfully with our products. The Network is in production now and customer is satisfied, but we know that, still we have 10+ major bugs which needs to get fixed in our products.

Now i can understand the difficulty of DRDO. Problem is, Our army dont want anything less than they demanded. If this is the mindset in any country, the product will remain in development forever. No product will get matured until it faces the real time scenario, its my experience...
 
Last edited:
Haha failed Arjun 1?Its already inducted & mk 2 would be what IA asked for.

Lmao looking at the stats etc n its uselessness .. looks like the indian army inducted it to save face... no wonder the orders for t-90 ... which india claims is inferior to arjun mbt(assembled in india and designed by a german.. ) :lol:

Haha showing typical @DESERT FIGHTER IQ..:lol: :lol:

Brahmos uses a turbofan?Thats joke of the year 2013!!!
Mr genius,Brahmos uses a Russian ramjet engine ( you knoe what that is? )
We have indigenous ramjet on Akash SAM,and on LRCM ( 2014 ).Even a Scramjet is under ground test ( by both ISRO & DRDO )

Did i talk abt yakhont .. oops... brahmos.. :lol:

Apart from tht which of these "scramjets","ramjets" n shamjets are in service... oh sorry they are on the drawing board?

P.S: Do i need to remind you of the discussion on a similiar topic u had with secur? :rofl:



And apply same logic to you,So can pakistan replace RD 33 on JF 17 with babur one??

If u are GSLV u sure can...

We have developed our own jet engines-HJE 2500,GTX 35,GTX 37,GTX 37 UB as TDs.
And PTAE 7 in Lakshya,Laghu Shakti on Nirbhay andKaveri for IUSAV/AMCA as production models.

Tell us abt the ones tht work..

P.S: Isnt lakshya a stupid target drone ? lmao.


And show me an institute like HALs ETBRC and GTRE,that can design an aero engine?

We dont go on boasting abt every small thing.. even a chilli bomb.. ;)

And none of these so called institutes produced a "aero engine" tht works..

Show me what experience you have in gas turbines.?
Show me the designation & specification for one on Babur,if you have.

Have Baburs specs been made public? oh... i forgot u knew abt em coz of ur wet dreams!



What?Did you ran out of BS?
Got to say anything about ATV,Agni V,Shaurya,Akash??

lol ATV= Based on Akula-1 class... built with russian help... even sailors are being trained by russia..

Agni V = A missile ballistic missile who cares..
Shaurya? lol = GSLVs CM.. :lol: ... according to tht logic evil Nasr is CM .. (quasi missile).
Akash=
Haha show your ignorance.
Can pakistan,make a supersonic LRCM? no !
A ramjet? No way.

Lmao.. dude first make a CM before talking nonsense... CMs,ALCMs are a dif.. game...

Oh yes Indian weapons are just 'CAD models'.Huh troll,we have been developing our own SLVs,missiles,jet fighters & trainers long before computer aided drafting and modelling was even develope

How many did succeeded? lol ?

The Ramjet engines are already on Service ( Akash SAM ) andLRCM would be test fired in 2014.

Cool story..

And Pakistan doesnt need CAD models,as it buys components from Chinese-RLGs,materials for heat shields,alloys.

Lol.. okay(sarcasm).. looks like u cant even do tht correctly?

Check @bloo s post & think about it.
And do you know that Russia has a policy of buying locally made weapons,only,and Brahmos turned out to be too costly for Vietnamese?

Again nonsense.. read my post... the russians according to u are partners and thus its not a foriegn system for them.. also they do buy foriegn systems... the ones they cant produce .. i.e ... mistral helicopter carrier,UAVs from Dubai etc etc..

Also the viets bought yakhont on a higher rate ... compared to brahmos (price u quoted) which was actually cheaper...



Try learning about Shaped trajectory systems,or at least go study some basic physics.

Again having a limited shaped trajectory doesnt make it a fukin CM... and u achieved tht with RUSSIAN HELP .. according to the shit u posted yourself..


The joke of the year...Pakistan can design their own missiles...but India need help..In which field??

Oops sorry its pakistan that needs help...in many fields.

You are a joke urself... read my reply...
Learn what 'ultra large forging is',and see that table too.

Heavy Manufacturing of Power Plants


No such facilities is in Pakistan.

Again kiddo ... for the billionth freakin time read my previous posts with links,sources...
:lol: More delusions from pdf expert...
Even the launchpads arent ready,let alone the SLV,there is no mention of it at Suparco website.

You are 35 years behind us in this...and counting.

No doubt we are behind india when it comes to space tech..

We can develop a tank & launch a sat,can you??

Yes .. and they work n are exported to other countries .. unlike arjun etc ... a tank ur own army has no confidence in..


Huh,So,what you claim as Indigenous 300 Mw reactors are Chinese design made in Pakistan & 150 MW,ones are CANDU.If these are pakistani,WVER 1000 is Indian-as it has more local produced components than any pakistani,made reactors.

And only indigenous design is 50 MW research rea,tor at Khushab.

And do you even know what is 'development of specifications'?

And see this.

' We cannot produce reactor shells, several pumps and the pressure vessels for which we will have to develop additional capacity or enter into a licensing agreement '

This proves my point,Pressure vessels are produced by ultra heavy forging facilities that Pakistan doesnt have,and no Pakistani company can produce pumps required.

In India we have Ultra heavy forging for reactor vessels ( Check my phwr thread) & kirloskar and like make pumps required.

And you claim,that WVER 1000 is assembled here..

Baby improve ur comprehension skills..
 
@ Desert Fighter

Can PAK Make any decent engine? NO they country still uses EURO 1 engines where was India started to make EURO 4 Engines.
 
Lmao looking at the stats etc n its uselessness .. looks like the indian army inducted it to save face... no wonder the orders for t-90 ... which india claims is inferior to arjun mbt(assembled in india and designed by a german.. ) :lol:

are you also saying PAK buys JF-17 for face saving and photo ops , after all when found inferior the production stopped from last 2 years. You people go hung about JF-17.

Since you people can't answer why the production of successful plane stopped , you banned indian to post on JF-17 post and broke your myth.

A) what a pity plane inducted for photo ops and then production stop from many years ,
B) No country shown interest (only oak myth that many country interested in JF-17)
C) china also didn't buyer any JF-17 , and consider MIG-21 more reliable.

In aviation history JF-17 is only super duper successful plane whose production stop after PAK declared it a superior plane.



Did i talk abt yakhont .. oops... brahmos.. :lol:

Apart from tht which of these "scramjets","ramjets" n shamjets are in service... oh sorry they are on the drawing board?


P.S: Do i need to remind you of the discussion on a similiar topic u had with secur? :rofl:

Some people knowledge in enough , they don't know Yakhont is ASM while Bharmos is ASM, LAM, and now going to be ALM.

Wish those who don't know the basic difference between yokhnot and bharmos can also say , We can fly Plane under water also one day.



If u are GSLV u sure can...


Tell us abt the ones tht work..

Well it is under development , and it will get success one day, like Indian moon find water and Indian mars mission underway which your bigger daddy china can't achieve to reach till mars.

P.S: Isnt lakshya a stupid target drone ? lmao.

A variant Lakshya-1 is used to perform discreet aerial reconnaissance of battlefield and target acquisition. and Now Lakshya-2 is in advance stage.

Indian has Old age technology , called "Jugard" which was also used again US made Parton Tanks which PAK thinks unbreakable and brake by Indian easily.


We dont go on boasting abt every small thing.. even a chilli bomb.. ;)
for boasting thing , you should have the thing, You hosted so much about JF-17 but what happened every country find MIG-21 is better then JF-17

And none of these so called institutes produced a "aero engine" tht works..
PTAE-7 is engine made by India itself and used in Lakshya and now making other

Did PAK made any engine itself? design and everything? NON

Have Baburs specs been made public? oh... i forgot u knew abt em coz of ur wet dreams!
specifications made public when they known by themselves, last time i PAk test North Korea missile by painting them and it blown in midway and oak hide it claiming it scuessfull. We know how you people extent to lie.

Remember when Lathe Machine is caught in india send by N. Korea to PAK? A country which can't make Lathe Machine , expected to make engine ? As you engineer what is Lathe Machine is .

lol ATV= Based on Akula-1 class... built with russian help... even sailors are being trained by russia..
Correct, Indian Nuclear SUB team trained in Russia because they are experienced and india want to gain knowledge from them. Nothing wrong in it.

Agni V = A missile ballistic missile who cares..
Shaurya? lol = GSLVs CM.. :lol: ... according to tht logic evil Nasr is CM .. (quasi missile).
Akash=
US , China care about Agni-1 Missile, and wonder why PAK can't make longer missile? because N.Korea is not able to make it now thats why PAK can't paint and claim it their.

Lmao.. dude first make a CM before talking nonsense... CMs,ALCMs are a dif.. game...
Well buddy, Indian has CM, a Super Sonic Cruse missile (Bahrmos ) not unlike PAK sub-Sonic Cruse missile .

Well Sub Sonic cruse missile develop also underway. Not a big deal. First you make super Sonic missile then argue.

How many did succeeded? lol ?





Cool story..



Lol.. okay(sarcasm).. looks like u cant even do tht correctly?



Again nonsense.. read my post... the russians according to u are partners and thus its not a foriegn system for them.. also they do buy foriegn systems... the ones they cant produce .. i.e ... mistral helicopter carrier,UAVs from Dubai etc etc..

Also the viets bought yakhont on a higher rate ... compared to brahmos (price u quoted) which was actually cheaper...

Well for your super duper brain, Yakhnot is ASM , while Brahmos ,is ASM, LACM, ALCM SLCM etc


Again having a limited shaped trajectory doesnt make it a fukin CM... and u achieved tht with RUSSIAN HELP .. according to the shit u posted yourself..
As world knows only Russian given the engine , rest is develop by india , that why it can be launched from AIR, Land and Sub which Yakhnot can't.

You are a joke urself... read my reply...


Again kiddo ... for the billionth freakin time read my previous posts with links,sources...


No doubt we are behind india when it comes to space tech..
You are not behind , you even don't know "S" when it came to space program, First make one Sats yourself.


Yes .. and they work n are exported to other countries .. unlike arjun etc ... a tank ur own army has no confidence in..

Baby improve ur comprehension skills..
Yes like JF-17 which claim success and PAF don't even buying them now.

Indian already decided to go for Arjun ;) now cheers up. you can't expect army to buy plane for crossing a river which only PAK can do.
 
Last edited:
Just as I expected,pdfs 'elite troll' is back with his typical strategies-namely,denial,ignorance & acting dumb

Lmao looking at the stats etc n its uselessness .. looks like the indian army inducted it to save face... no wonder the orders for t-90 ... which india claims is inferior to arjun mbt(assembled in india and designed by a german.. ) :lol:

Designed by german,got any proof?
Ever heard of operational requirements?Just check out why army chose T 90.And assembled in India?It is fully manufactured here.We are not pakistan!
Did i talk abt yakhont .. oops... brahmos.. :lol:

Apart from tht which of these "scramjets","ramjets" n shamjets are in service... oh sorry they are on the drawing board?

P.S: Do i need to remind you of the discussion on a similiar topic u had with secur? :rofl:

Dude,have some shame atleast.You even claimed 'Brahmos uses a turbofan'.I can easily judge your knowledge base from that.

And ramjet in service? On Akash SAM
Scramjet on service?How many countries have them?ZERO !

Scramjet engines are experimental projects for technology demonstrators,the actual purpose is for used in Single Stage To Orbit Reusable launch Vehicles like Skylon & India's Avatar spaceplane-For the future.
Did you understand anything I said?No?

Scrmjet engine has already been ground tested,And both ISRO & DRDO are looking for first flight on 2014,google ISRO ATV & HSTDV.

And I was having a good discussion with Secur about Ramjets,ones used on Akash & LRCM.

If u are GSLV u sure can...

Sorry,my knowledge about these are far better than you...

Tell us abt the ones tht work..

P.S: Isnt lakshya a stupid target drone ? lmao.

Huh typical troll behaviour,trying to veer this discussion off topic.We are talking about jet engines.

Lakshya's PTAE 7? Already inducted
Laghu Shakti produce 400kgf thrust
Kaveri produces 80 kN thrust with full after burner,and would be integrated with a Mig 29 by next year for flight tests.

Now tell me about Pakistans expertise in GTs...please

We dont go on boasting abt every small thing.. even a chilli bomb.. ;)

And none of these so called institutes produced a "aero engine" tht works..

Yes they producing working engines like PTAE7,Kaveri and Laghu Shakti.
Now where is my answer?Gas turbine design institute?You cant even develop a motor cycle engine,let alone a GT
Have Baburs specs been made public? oh... i forgot u knew abt em coz of ur wet dreams!

If not please shut up and start a 'motorcycle engine development centre ' at least.

lol ATV= Based on Akula-1 class... built with russian help... even sailors are being trained by russia..

Agni V = A missile ballistic missile who cares..
Shaurya? lol = GSLVs CM.. :lol: ... according to tht logic evil Nasr is CM .. (quasi missile).
Akash=

:lol:
ATV = Akula?When both even do not even look the,same?:lol:

?go google the pics & specs of both.Russian help was with reactor safeguard measures,The sub is our design & rector.
And training?How is that involved in development?

Agni V? An ICBM,can Pakistan make one?No
Agni IV?An advanced IRBM making use of composites and Indian RLG,can go 4000 km .Now show me a Pakistani RLG/composite motor
Shaurya?An advanced STM ...who said its,a cruise missile & your comparing it with your little Nasr?

mao.. dude first make a CM before talking nonsense... CMs,ALCMs are a dif.. game...

Who said they are the same?Werent you claiming that thesd are like Ramjet LRCM?
How many did succeeded? lol ?

Almost all.like SLV,ASLV,Marut,Kiran.....PSLV many more...these were developed before 90z.
Now keep showing your ignorance.

Cool story..

Ran out of BS again?Akash was inducted wayback,and LRCM is in ground testing phase.


Lol.. okay(sarcasm).. looks like u cant even do tht correctly?

Indian,made RLG already on Agni 3,4,5,Shaurya
Alloys are developed in India,for use in our missile programs,aerospace programs,aero engines.
All composte RVs on Agni 3,4,5,shaurya.[/quote]
 
Last edited:
are you also saying PAK buys JF-17 for face saving and photo ops , after all when found inferior the production stopped from last 2 years. You people go hung about JF-17


Cool story any source for tht nonsense?Blk-II is soon be inducted.. so much for ur rants..
Since you people can't answer why the production of successful plane stopped , you banned indian to post on JF-17 post and broke your myth.



A) what a pity plane inducted for photo ops and then production stop from many years ut ,
B) No country shown interest (only oak myth that many country interested in JF-17)

Cool story.. W


C) china also didn't buyer any JF-17 , and consider MIG-21 more reliable.

In aviation history JF-17 is only super duper successful plane whose production stop after PAK declared it a superior plane.





Some people knowledge in enough , they don't know Yakhont is ASM while Bharmos is ASM, LAM, and now going to be ALM.

Wish those who don't know the basic difference between yokhnot and bharmos can also say , We can fly Plane under water also one day.





Well it is under development , and it will get success one day, like Indian moon find water and Indian mars mission underway which your bigger daddy china can't achieve to reach till mars.



A variant Lakshya-1 is used to perform discreet aerial reconnaissance of battlefield and target acquisition. and Now Lakshya-2 is in advance stage.

Indian has Old age technology , called "Jugard" which was also used again US made Parton Tanks which PAK thinks unbreakable and brake by Indian easily.



for boasting thing , you should have the thing, You hosted so much about JF-17 but what happened every country find MIG-21 is better then JF-17


PTAE-7 is engine made by India itself and used in Lakshya and now making other

Did PAK made any engine itself? design and everything? NON


specifications made public when they known by themselves, last time i PAk test North Korea missile by painting them and it blown in midway and oak hide it claiming it scuessfull. We know how you people extent to lie.

Remember when Lathe Machine is caught in india send by N. Korea to PAK? A country which can't make Lathe Machine , expected to make engine ? As you engineer what is Lathe Machine is .


Correct, Indian Nuclear SUB team trained in Russia because they are experienced and india want to gain knowledge from them. Nothing wrong in it.


US , China care about Agni-1 Missile, and wonder why PAK can't make longer missile? because N.Korea is not able to make it now thats why PAK can't paint and claim it their.


Well buddy, Indian has CM, a Super Sonic Cruse missile (Bahrmos ) not unlike PAK sub-Sonic Cruse missile .

Well Sub Sonic cruse missile develop also underway. Not a big deal. First you make super Sonic missile then argue.

Forgot to take ur meds today ?
 
Back
Top Bottom