What's new

Arabia - Is Change Enough?

muse

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
13,006
Reaction score
0
Saudi Arabia — is the change enough?
By Saleem H Ali
Published: September 29, 2011

Some glimmers of hope regarding women’s rights in Saudi Arabia appeared last week when King Abdullah decreed that women would finally be allowed to vote. But upon careful reading, this ‘law’ may well be a mirage. First the voting allowance does not come into force for at least another three years and this will only apply to local government elections. Furthermore, such elections are of little consequence in a monarchy where absolute power of veto resides with the king. Saudi women are still subject to arcane ‘guardianship’ rules at the behest of a primordial view of Islamic law. Due to this, they cannot travel, open a bank account, or visit a doctor without being accompanied by a male relative. Only a few days after this supposed modernisation, a woman was ordered 10 lashes for driving!

For decades, the Saudi elite who can be found carousing around Fifth Avenue in New York, have said that “they need time” and cultures must change with ‘caution’. This argument is now stale and sickening. The only way to change moribund traditionalism is to confront it directly since the conservative establishment does not have any allowance for change or development. Recall the only real change in Saudi laws occurred when the late King Faisal directly decreed that women could attend school. He refused to buckle under the extreme views of the clerics and perhaps was assassinated as a result (though the conditions and causes of his assassination are still shrouded in mystery). Thanks to King Faisal, Saudi women can at least attend school!

The Saudi establishment must realise that the only way of change against theocratic forces is to provide a direct alternative theological narrative and stick by it. Incremental approaches in religious context lead to inertia. There is no doubt that allowing women to drive will unsettle the clerics in the Saudi hinterland but this is a price they must pay for empowering 50 per cent of their population. Now, it is important to also note that some Saudi women might well be quite sanguine about their subservience. When you live in palaces and have chauffeurs and servants to meet your every need, there is little cause to yearn for emancipation.

Acolytes of subservient Saudi women have given rise to Pakistani women evangelists such as Dr Farhat Hashmi and this is where the problem becomes more acute and is not just a Saudi issue. The evangelism of the Saudis is eroding the edifice of pluralism within the Muslim world and needs to be stopped and countered. Even progressive Muslim states like Malaysia are being radicalised by such exclusionary, intolerant and xenophobic views which have already spread across Pakistan. Furthermore, since this view also repudiates population control, the birth rate of the fanatics is much higher than the moderates. The same problem is also true of extreme versions of Judaism that have radicalised Israel.

So what can we all do? Even supposedly liberal Pakistani scholars go to Saudi Arabia on lavish business class trips to give lectures. The American elite are similarly lavished with hospitality and contracts to buy their acquiescence. During the apartheid years, South Africa’s racist elite had to be shamed into changing their behaviour. While sanctions against Saudi Arabia are out of the question, individual acts of protest must continue and rise. The right to drive can be a simple and symbolic focus of action (though there are many other problems in Saudi law as well towards religious minorities etc.).

I have thankfully done my Hajj so the religious obligation having been completed, I personally commit to rejecting any lectures or contracts from the Kingdom until women are allowed to drive. Most Saudis would laugh and say — who cares about little old me — but if enough scholars and practitioners take this bold step, change will come.
When their billion-dollar boutique universities have minimal brain trust — change will come. Even if there is no change, at least my conscience will be clear because how can one justify not giving basic rights to members of the gender under whose feet paradise is promised by the Holy Prophet (pbuh).
 
.
Thank you for this excellent article muse PRAVA

It certainly gave an insight to the voting scheme for women in SA.

May the Peace and Blessings of Allah tallah be upon you....

Peace
 
.
Thanks for the useless post.Now the anti arabism should convert to anti americanism
 
.
Thanks for the useless post.Now the anti arabism should convert to anti americanism

It must be easy for you to cry anti-arabism, and it must be because you are not thinking.

It is because we care that we must point to these --
 
.
September 29, 2011
Saudi Men Go to Polls; Women Wait
By LIAM STACK

CAIRO — Saudi men voted in local elections on Thursday for just the second time in the history of the conservative kingdom, but the polls remained closed to a majority of the Saudi population, including women, who were promised the right to vote in municipal elections scheduled for 2015 in a royal decree issued last week.

The elections were for local advisory councils with no lawmaking authority or ability to alter the status quo in one of the world’s few remaining absolute monarchies. Also barred from voting were men employed by the police and security forces as well as all men under the age of 21. Official figures estimate the number of eligible voters to be 1.2 million out of more than 18 million Saudi citizens.

“These elections are not representative of Saudi society,” said Ibrahim al-Mugaiteeb, the director of the Human Rights First Society, a Saudi organization. “Only 5 to 8 percent of the population is able to vote. That is very small.”

Official figures for the turnout were not available on Thursday, according to The Associated Press, which reported that the Saudi news media and activists said it was low.

The vote took place two years behind schedule; it was postponed in 2009 by King Abdullah. The first-ever vote was held in 2005, at which time rights activists said the king promised that women would vote next time around.

The vote and the renewed promise to allow women greater future political participation demonstrate the careful steps that Saudi rulers appear to be taking to preserve the prerogatives of absolute rule and shield their kingdom from greater demands for democracy that have spread through the region.

Saudi Arabia has tried to inoculate itself against the wave of upheaval challenging autocrats across the Arab world.

This year, it has spent billions of dollars to pump up salaries, build housing and finance religious organizations, among other outlays, in a bid to preserve public stability. In March, it sent troops into neighboring Bahrain to help a fellow monarch crush an uprising whose popular nature and Shiite sectarian overtones were deemed a threat to the country’s regional interests and stability.


Saudi Arabia has no penal code and no elected legislature at any level of its government. The national counterpart to the toothless local advisory councils is the Shura Council, whose members are appointed by King Abdullah. Last week, he also vowed to name women to the council during its next round of appointments in 2012.

Many saw those pledges as a promising move, but optimism was quickly tempered two days later when a court convicted Shaimaa Ghassaneya, a woman from the Red Sea port city of Jidda, of violating the country’s ban on women’s driving. She was sentenced to receive 10 lashes for the crime, a surprisingly harsh sentence that provoked an outcry that threatened to overshadow the promise of women’s suffrage in 2015.

King Abdullah revoked that sentence on Thursday, an act of clemency that, for many, remained a reminder of the arbitrary power of the Saudi monarchy.

“Can you imagine a local council member or a Shura Council member who cannot drive her own car to the grocery store?” asked Mr. Mugaiteeb, whose organization abandoned plans to boycott Thursday’s vote after the pledge to allow women to vote. “It is a disgrace.”

Others celebrated the news of Ms. Ghassaneya’s royal pardon. Ameerah al-Taweel, a prominent Saudi philanthropist and member of the royal family, applauded on Twitter.

“Thank God, the lashing of Shaima is cancelled. Thanks to our beloved King,” she wrote. “I’m sure all Saudi women will be so happy, I know I am.”
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom