What's new

Appointment of deputy heir to throne stirs controversy in Saudi Arabia

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
saudi-compos1401316441.jpg

Clockwise from top left: AP, Reuters, Reuters, AP - Clockwise from top left: Deputy Crown Prince Muqrin, King Abdullah, Crown Prince Salman Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud and Saud bin Abdul Aziz.


By Liz Sly, Published: May 26 E-mail the writer
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — When Saudi Arabia’s elderly king took the unusual step of naming a deputy heir, the move initially was welcomed as a sign of continuity in a country that soon will confront major questions over the future of its leadership.

But in subsequent weeks, the announcement has stirred a rare outburst of dissent, revealing previously unacknowledged strains within the royal family and casting into doubt prospects for a smooth transition from King Abdullah’s rule.

Graphic



Running out of brothers: The Saudi royal family

More world coverage

@mutjahidd, which has 1.4 million followers and is thought to belong to a palace insider because its information often is accurate.

The griping may merely reflect sour grapes among those left out in a looming transfer of power, or perhaps just the increased opportunities afforded by social media for tensions to come to light.

It has become clear, however, that Muqrin’s elevation is unpopular in at least some quarters, foreshadowing the strife that many fear will erupt as the older generation of the royal family passes away.

The controversy goes to the core of what is perhaps the biggest question hanging over the future stability of this family-run, oil-rich country, which does not have a clearly defined succession process in place.

The founder of the Saudi state, King Abdul Aziz ibn Saud, decreed only that his first son would inherit the throne, and over the subsequent six decades the succession passed from brother to brother roughly in order of their age. Soon, however, the last of the current line of brothers (of which there were at least 35) will die, necessitating a transfer of power to the brothers’ sons — the third generation of the family.

Given that there are scores of princes in that category, the potential for discord is high. Whoever inherits the throne is likely to anoint his own brothers as future heirs, thereby cutting out multiple cousins from access to the throne and the patronage it provides.

In light of Saudi Arabia’s strategic significance as the world’s biggest supplier of oil and a close ally of the United States, the succession dispute is of “considerable concern,” said Simon Henderson of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

“The identity and character of the future king is not known, and the circumstances under which he becomes king are likely to be contentious,” he said. “That introduces instability to Saudi Arabia.”

The issue also is growing in urgency as Abdullah enters his 90s. He breathed with the help of a respirator throughout his two-hour meeting with Obama in March, and he makes frequent visits to hospitals in the United States. His immediate successor, Crown Prince Salman, is hardly in better shape.

And so the choice of Muqrin, a British-educated fighter pilot who has close ties to the United States, had at least some logic. A relatively youthful 69, he could be king for years, deferring the tricky question of how to transition to the next generation. In light of the poor health of Salman, who is said to be suffering a form of dementia, it would seem to make sense to have an heir in reserve.

But designating a successor is traditionally the prerogative of the reigning monarch, and the job of deputy has never existed before. Moreover, the naming of Muqrin skipped over at least two other brothers, upsetting the unspoken rule that the succession passes down according to age.

“What happened was against Islam and against the whole history of Saudi Arabia. There is no such thing as a deputy crown prince,” said the former Saudi official, who supports Ahmed, one of the older brothers, and hopes that Salman will revoke Muqrin’s appointment should he become king.

Theories abound as to why Abdullah made the move — all of them, like most of what transpires in this opaque and secretive kingdom, entirely speculative.

One, widely disseminated on Twitter, holds that Abdullah is seeking to secure the future of his own sons once the succession passes to the next generation. Muqrin, who lacks important tribal connections or an influential position, will be beholden, the theory goes, to Abdullah’s sons, notably his favorite, Mithab, who heads the national guard.

Another theory blames the powerful head of the royal court, Khaled Tuwairji, who is accused of duping the frail Abdullah into appointing Muqrin in return for a promise that he will keep his job after Abdullah dies.

“The sinister acts and destructive tendencies of this person are the cause,” tweeted Saud bin Saif al-Nasser, a prince whose father was passed over.

Western diplomats in Riyadh say the king may simply have been trying to secure the future of the monarchy but instead has exposed its vulnerabilities.

“Muqrin will potentially be the weakest king in Saudi history,“ said one, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the subject is sensitive. “He is not from the first ranks of the royal family, he has no constituency and he will have to ride herd on a lot of powerful princes.”


Ahmed Ramadan in Beirut contributed to this report.
Appointment of deputy heir to throne stirs controversy in Saudi Arabia - The Washington Post
 
Well such speculation is of no use right now.

What is a fact though is that KSA is one of the most stable countries not only in the ME but the world. With one of the most stable and fastest growing economies and barely any crime despite being located in a region in turmoil.

All the state institutions are in place and in a worst case scenario, although extremely unlikely and unprecedented, where rebellion or some short of large-scale riot will take place, then those institutions will not disintegrate since they are institutions supported by the people and run by them. At most they will change.

Just like KSA could turn into, which I also think will happen, into a constitutional monarchy on the long run. Or into a republic.

Regarding the succession line which is the subject of this article then the decision of the future Crown Prince is BY NO MEANS taken by the monarch alone. Just like choosing the monarch is done by a council of influential members of the royal family and people of high position not from the royal family (Allegiance Council).

There were kings of KSA that had to prove their worth as well in the past but they all ultimately succeeded. I see no reason to why Muqrin cannot do it. There will always be some kind of rivalry but as long as it just stays with complains on Twitter there is no problem in my view.

Oh, that's an old, old photo of a young Ibn Saud there! Or is it a young King Saud?

Opinions @Yzd Khalifa @JUBA @Full Moon @Hadbani etc.
 
Last edited:
why they didn't gave the title to Prince Ahmed ?
what was the problem with him ?
 
why they didn't gave the title to Prince Ahmed ?
what was the problem with him ?

You have to choose someone. I don't think that there is any problem. Muqrin is just the youngest son of Ibn Saud, is well-educated, well-liked and has experience in the system. He was supported by most and King Abdullah himself. He will continue the liberal line of King Abdullah but at the same time he also has to please the still somewhat powerful religious class. So he can't beetoo liberal at once. It's a gradual process. The people must be ready too.

Anyway the King is just the figurehead. It's not like he makes all decisions or even 1% of them by himself. He has a wide ranch of advisers from all sectors of the society.
 
Nice and fair decision-

One change i would recommend is let Fakeh keep health ministry permanently and vacate the labor ministry ASAP- Lol
 
Nice and fair decision-

One change i would recommend is let Fakeh keep health ministry permanently and vacate the labor ministry ASAP- Lol

What the article is right about is how the succession and governance will look like when the grandsons of Ibn Saud will arrive on the scene. I mean the uncertainty surrounded by it. By that time KSA might have undergone huge changes. Just look at the changes in the past 10 years. It's like 20-30 years in other countries.

They will have different views and are children of another slightly different epoch. I can't imagine what the great-grandsons will be like (my generation).

Anyway by that time KSA will probably become a constitutional monarchy with a very strong and independent military, highly educated population, a new reality and a stable and growing economy. Look at all the prognosis of the future GDP per capita in the world in 2030, 2040 and 2050. KSA is consequently in the top 10 and sometimes even top 5. The native population will probably not be bigger than 50-55 million by then (2050). An ideal population IMO.

I agree. They need to change some ministry's. Al Rabiah already "lost his head".

Anyway I am excited to see what the future will bring since the potential is enormous.

One can say that the conflict in Syria, aside from being a tragedy in a fellow Arab country and nearly neighbor, has shown one good thing. Namely that rebellion to topple a regime is not always the best way forward and even if it is the costs are huge and it can delay the progress for a decade. KSA cannot afford that to happen.

Anyway the House of Saud have majority support (clear one) but they know that this can potentially turn so they have to do their jobs.
 
Last edited:
Anyway to hell with Salman and Muqrin.

Let the people appoint the current Emir of Wales Sheikh Sharif Charles ibn Philip al-Windsor al-Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg. Currently next in line to become Malik of United Kingdomistan where he will rule directly from Londonistan.









Probably the first time that he felt as a real king.:lol: All joking aside then he is a likable character.
 
Back
Top Bottom