What's new

Antony defers decision on critical but controversial missile deals with Israel

Indo-guy

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
4,820
Reaction score
2
Country
India
Location
Singapore
Antony defers decision on critical but controversial missile deals with Israel - The Times of India


NEW DELHI: Defence minister AK Antony on Monday refused to bite the bullet on two critical but controversial major missile deals with Israel, but cleared other proposals for rockets, night sights, munitions, simulators and vehicles worth over Rs 7,000 crore for the armed forces.

Sources said the Antony-led defence acquisitions council (DAC), attended by the three service chiefs and defence secretary, kept the decision on the over Rs 15,000 crore project to equip the Army's 355 infantry battalions with Israeli "Spike" third-generation anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs) "on the hold" for now.

The Navy's proposed acquisition of an additional 262 Barak-I missiles to arm the Israeli anti-missile defence ( AMD) systems fitted on 14 Indian frontline warships including aircraft carrier INS Viraat, in turn was referred to "an independent group" within the defence ministry for a thorough evaluation.

The "final decision" on the Barak deal will, however, be taken by the DAC within a month or so. "The law ministry and the attorney general has left it to the MoD to take a call on the matter on the ground of operational necessity despite the pending probe into the Barak kickbacks case since October 2006," said a source.

As reported by TOI last week, both the Spike and Barak deals are with Israeli firm Rafael on "a single vendor" basis without global competition. The two have been kept pending for long despite the military pressing for these "critical operational requirements" due to controversies like "leaks" of top-secret documents and the pending seven-year-old CBI case into the original Barak missile deal.

The US has also been hard-selling its own Javelin ATGMs to India, with deputy secretary of defence Ash Carter even offering a joint project to manufacture the next-generation of the tank-killing missiles during his visit to India in September.

Among the projects cleared were the Rs 3,794 crore one to acquire "night sights for carbines" from Indian companies, the Rs 682 crore procurement of Russian extended range Grad BM-21 rockets and the Rs 137 crore purchase of technical support vehicles for Russian T-90S main-battle tanks.

The DAC also approved the waiver of certain offset provisions for the Rs 4,381 crore order for four more American P-8I long-range maritime patrol aircraft. The Navy is already inducting eight P-8I aircraft under a $2.1 billion deal inked with aviation major Boeing in January 2009.

The DAC also extended by three months the tender for the proposed Rs 13,000-crore project to acquire 56 transport aircraft to replace the ageing Avro fleet of the IAF. This comes in the backdrop of NCP leader and heavy industries minister Praful Patel questioning the MoD's decision to keep state-run units like defence PSU Hindustan Aeronautics out of the project. "The matter is being examined in detail," said an official.
 
Single vendor purchases must be avoided, except in some emergency situation
 
The DAC also extended by three months the tender for the proposed Rs 13,000-crore project to acquire 56 transport aircraft to replace the ageing Avro fleet of the IAF. This comes in the backdrop of NCP leader and heavy industries minister Praful Patel questioning the MoD's decision to keep state-run units like defence PSU Hindustan Aeronautics out of the project. "The matter is being examined in detail," said an official.

Interesting, HAL gets support.
 
Interesting, HAL gets support.


that too from one of the most corrupt Civil aviation minister in history of India !!!

Given Praful Patel's track record , I doubt his intentions to support HAL !!! 
Single vendor purchases must be avoided, except in some emergency situation


But then majority defense purchases in India are quasi-emergency type. isn't it ???

we are specialized in last moment run offs ....

we typically start digging for wells when our house is half-burnt already with optimistic thoughts of saving remaining 1/1000'th of house by the time we are done with digging !!!

in that sense I guess single vendor purchases can be justified .....right !
 
Last edited:
this defence minister must grow some balls or ask a doctor to give him a dose of testosterone

he can't even decide on one thing
 
Antony defers decision on critical but controversial missile deals with Israel - The Times of India


NEW DELHI: Defence minister AK Antony on Monday refused to bite the bullet on two critical but controversial major missile deals with Israel, but cleared other proposals for rockets, night sights, munitions, simulators and vehicles worth over Rs 7,000 crore for the armed forces.

Sources said the Antony-led defence acquisitions council (DAC), attended by the three service chiefs and defence secretary, kept the decision on the over Rs 15,000 crore project to equip the Army's 355 infantry battalions with Israeli "Spike" third-generation anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs) "on the hold" for now.

The Navy's proposed acquisition of an additional 262 Barak-I missiles to arm the Israeli anti-missile defence ( AMD) systems fitted on 14 Indian frontline warships including aircraft carrier INS Viraat, in turn was referred to "an independent group" within the defence ministry for a thorough evaluation.

The "final decision" on the Barak deal will, however, be taken by the DAC within a month or so. "The law ministry and the attorney general has left it to the MoD to take a call on the matter on the ground of operational necessity despite the pending probe into the Barak kickbacks case since October 2006," said a source.

As reported by TOI last week, both the Spike and Barak deals are with Israeli firm Rafael on "a single vendor" basis without global competition. The two have been kept pending for long despite the military pressing for these "critical operational requirements" due to controversies like "leaks" of top-secret documents and the pending seven-year-old CBI case into the original Barak missile deal.

The US has also been hard-selling its own Javelin ATGMs to India, with deputy secretary of defence Ash Carter even offering a joint project to manufacture the next-generation of the tank-killing missiles during his visit to India in September.

Among the projects cleared were the Rs 3,794 crore one to acquire "night sights for carbines" from Indian companies, the Rs 682 crore procurement of Russian extended range Grad BM-21 rockets and the Rs 137 crore purchase of technical support vehicles for Russian T-90S main-battle tanks.

The DAC also approved the waiver of certain offset provisions for the Rs 4,381 crore order for four more American P-8I long-range maritime patrol aircraft. The Navy is already inducting eight P-8I aircraft under a $2.1 billion deal inked with aviation major Boeing in January 2009.

The DAC also extended by three months the tender for the proposed Rs 13,000-crore project to acquire 56 transport aircraft to replace the ageing Avro fleet of the IAF. This comes in the backdrop of NCP leader and heavy industries minister Praful Patel questioning the MoD's decision to keep state-run units like defence PSU Hindustan Aeronautics out of the project. "The matter is being examined in detail," said an official.



Antony will not sanction the "Crucial but Controversial" defense purchase even if war breaks out ....

He will break but won't bend ....and I don't know whether to thank him or curse him for that ....
 
EFF YOU Antony! Def Min defers decisions on defence deals- what's new?

God, roll on 2014 General elections and this clown out of office.
 
this defence minister must grow some balls or ask a doctor to give him a dose of testosterone

he can't even decide on one thing

I agree with you on later part ....I am not sure about first part though !!! 
EFF YOU Antony! Def Min defers decisions on defence deals- what's new?

God, roll on 2014 General elections and this clown out of office.

In other words we can put it as " Defense minister is too Defensive...He believes in flight than fight,.... "
 
Antony will not sanction the "Crucial but Controversial" defense purchase even if war breaks out ....

He will break but won't bend ....and I don't know whether to thank him or curse him for that ....
Thank him for what? Protecting his own political legacy/image??

This joker is having a detrimental affect on India's national security, he shouldn't be thanked for this.


It just shows his lack of character- a spineless, self-serving, coward is all he is.
 
Thank him for what? Protecting his own political legacy/image??

This joker is having a detrimental affect on India's national security, he shouldn't be thanked for this.


It just shows his lack of character- a spineless, self-serving, coward is all he is.

for once i am with u
 
that too from one of the most corrupt Civil aviation minister in history of India !!!

Given Praful Patel's track record , I doubt his intentions to support HAL !!! 



But then majority defense purchases in India are quasi-emergency type. isn't it ???

we are specialized in last moment run offs ....

we typically start digging for wells when our house is half-burnt already with optimistic thoughts of saving remaining 1/1000'th of house by the time we are done with digging !!!

in that sense I guess single vendor purchases can be justified .....right !
im not a great supporter of congress but its the govts responsibility to optimize its psu s and CAG will question on single vendor purchases.i think we already have enough controversies on defence acquisition CAG orders an enquiry this will become another forever delayed deal.govts must opt for competitive bidding especially in defence deals
 
Thank him for what? Protecting his own political legacy/image??

This joker is having a detrimental affect on India's national security, he shouldn't be thanked for this.


It just shows his lack of character- a spineless, self-serving, coward is all he is.



I meant thank for not turning another Corruption ridden minister in UPA II cabinet ...

He is the only one spared from corruption scandal among whole of the UPA II ministry ....

But off course ...I said it sarcastically ....


He is heir of PV Narsimnha Rao who belived " No Action is also An Action "

But PV Narsimha Rao atleast proved good in something for nation ....

Antony has no legacy but subserving narcissism to his record ....

He takes great pride in parliamentary debates to tell opposition that his integrity beyond doubts ....that's it

He is happy with that achievement as Defense minister of India !!! 
im not a great supporter of congress but its the govts responsibility to optimize its psu s and CAG will question on single vendor purchases.i think we already have enough controversies on defence acquisition CAG orders an enquiry this will become another forever delayed deal.govts must opt for competitive bidding especially in defence deals


Reminds me of " Dudh ke jale huye Chaaanch bhi phoonk phoonk ke pit hain " .......

You are trying to justify one mistake by another overcorrecting mistake ....

Unfortunately two mistakes in opposite direction don't cancel each other ......
 
I meant thank for not turning another Corruption ridden minister in UPA II cabinet ...

He is the only one spared from corruption scandal among whole of the UPA II ministry ....

But off course ...I said it sarcastically ....


He is heir of PV Narsimnha Rao who belived " No Action is also An Action "

But PV Narsimha Rao atleast proved good in something for nation ....

Antony has no legacy but subserving narcissism to his record ....

He takes great pride in parliamentary debates to tell opposition that his integrity beyond doubts ....that's it

He is happy with that achievement as Defense minister of India !!! 


Reminds me of " Dudh ke jale huye Chaaanch bhi phoonk phoonk ke pit hain " .......

You are trying to justify one mistake by another overcorrecting mistake ....

Unfortunately two mistakes in opposite direction don't cancel each other ......

im not the part of govt.why should i justify anything.i'm only saying the inevitable.u think the CAG is going to sign just like that if its not by a competitive bidding??he questioned the airforce for changing the specifications in agusta westland case.we all know its position now.we sure dont want other deals becoming like that dont we?
 
im not the part of govt.why should i justify anything.i'm only saying the inevitable.u think the CAG is going to sign just like that if its not by a competitive bidding??he questioned the airforce for changing the specifications in agusta westland case.we all know its position now.we sure dont want other deals becoming like that dont we?

there are ways to do anything
during making policy changes give in writing at that time only the reasons for doing so,,,keep public in confidence

the problem is when its done in secrecy or no record is kept for reasons behind policy change
 
Back
Top Bottom