BanglaBhoot
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2007
- Messages
- 8,839
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The source of that information that anti-Indian sentiment was growing in the Bangladesh Army were the participants at the BIISS seminar attended by some Indian nationals. Why were they not arrested?
The question is how did they get here?
Wasn't India supposed to be worshiped as the saviour of Bangla people after 'liberating' them from...well themselves!
It happened because traitors were not identified and eliminated in time, instead they were allowed to thrive with help of enemy nations and they eventually became powerful politicians and leaders who misled the people and sold them the Indian project of breaking Pakistan and creating Bangladesh as the solution to all our problems, whereas in reality destiny of smaller and weaker Bangladesh, surrounded by India on 3 sides, is to remain a vassal state of India with Indian puppets ruling it on behalf of India.
The only future way out I can see is Bangladesh teaming up with other willing large Muslim nations of the world who can help the people of Bangladesh eventually wrestle it away from Indian clutch.
Anti-Indian feelings have existed in Bangladesh to some extent, especially in the military circle, since the country’s war of independence in 1971, the chief of an Indian government-sponsored think tank said yesterday. “Like many, a country needs an external foe. After 1971, India replaced West Pakistan [now Pakistan] in that role. There is a national tendency to see an Indian hand behind all disturbing events,” Sitaram Sharma, chairman Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies (MAKIAS), said. He came up with these observations while presenting a keynote paper at an international seminar on ‘Contemporary Thoughts on Bangladesh-India Relations: Challenges and Opportunities’, organised by the Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS) at its auditorium in Dhaka.
Commenting on Sharma’s paper, former ambassador Mohsin said there exist no anti-Indian elements in Bangladesh; rather there are frustration and resentment due to India’s failure to deliver on unresolved issues.
About the significance of Dhaka-New Delhi ties, MAKIAS chairman Sharma said, “The importance of a thorough analysis of the current state of Bangladesh-India relations can hardly be exaggerated. India can remain indifferent to Bangladesh only at the cost of its vital political, economic and strategic interests.”
Aside from Sharma’s paper, five other papers were presented in the three-session seminar on issues relating to Bangladesh-India relations.
Senior civil and military officials including former ambassadors, members of the academia, businessmen, representatives of think-tanks, scholars and policymakers participated in the open discussions and raised their opinions, suggestions and questions on Bangladesh-India relations.
The presenters, discussants and participants talked about issues like border killings, water sharing of common rivers, maritime cooperation, VISA processing and e-token system, smuggling, cross-border terrorism, non-tariff barriers, informal trades, transit and alleged illegal migration to India.
MAKIAS director Sreeradha Datta raised the issue of alleged illegal migration of Bangladeshis to India, and said this issue needed to be discussed. “How long will Bangladesh keep denying this issue?” she questioned.
On this issue, former foreign secretary and Bangladesh Enterprise Institute president Farooq Sobhan and former ambassador Ashfaqur Rahman said despite repeated requests from the Bangladesh side India did not provide specific facts and figures about the issue.
“You cannot allege without facts and figure,” said Rahman.
He also said, “We have Indians here working illegally. It is said that they remit about $4 billion annually to India from Bangladesh. We are the second remitter of India.” “In order to build trust, we have to address the issues together.”
Summing up the seminar, Farooq Sobhan emphasised on showing some concrete actions from the Indian side on issues like Teesta water sharing agreement, LBA and border killings.
Failure to address these issues has impact on public opinion in Bangladesh, he said.
On illegal migration, Sobhan said, “During my tenure as the Bangladesh high commissioner to India, I had asked the Indians in vain for a specific figure.”
He also stressed the need for defining illegal migrants.
Stressing the need for working together, the former foreign secretary said India needs to realise the importance of Bangladesh in economic development of its northeastern states.
Similarly, he said, Bangladesh could also enormously be benefited from the cooperation with India.
BIISS Director General Major General SM Shafiuddin Ahmed delivered the welcome address with its chairman ambassador Munshi Faiz Ahmad chairing the first session of the seminar.
Anti-Indian feelings exist in Bangladesh, says Sharma
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The speakers at the seminar barely touch on the real reasons why there is deep resentment towards India in Bangladesh. For a fuller and deeper analysis please try my book The India Doctrine -
The India Doctrine (1947-2007) | Mohammad Munshi - Academia.edu
There would be no Bangladesh without us
t seems so. Just like USA creates it's own enemies, India ensures an unfriendly neighborhood. Probably that helps leaders in forging cohesion in this nation of differing cultures, faiths, races and languages.Indians make sure there are anti indian feelings in all their neighbors. But I am sure Indian have good relationships with Manamar so they can stab you from behind, a true India character
This makes me so sad..
But please don't fight a war with us (or Myanmar). Otherwise tens of millions of refugees will come running at us like '71, and BSF doesn't have that many bullets.
The question is how did they get here?
Wasn't India supposed to be worshiped as the saviour of Bangla people after 'liberating' them from...well themselves!
No, India was never supposed to be 'worshiped'. The hatred runs deep - given that partition had to happen. Just because 'brotherhood' didn't last doesn't means they can love what they perceive as bigger enemy - Hindu India. Mind you, not all Bangladeshi people are like that. But a sizable number wanted to not be together with India and they were incapable to love India, savior or not. They couldn't even love Pakistan! How could they love the bigger neighbor which they separated from so acrimoniously?