Anti-India Protests Erupt in Kashmir Amid Deadly Fighting

[Joe Shearer]

Indian Union? ? Consisting a disputed territory with no international border

Yes, the Indian Union. The international border exists; that there are portions occupied by a military occupation does not vitiate those borders.

 

[Max]

We have poured in nothing but what is allocated to the budget of the state government, and a small amount for gathering intelligence.

So the million occupiers are funded from mandirs?

 

[war&peace]

If you check the records and the statistics, you will find the falsity of these remarks. Until 1989, there was peaceful development. As soon as there was a relief in the pressure on the western borders of Pakistan, and people and trainers and surplus arms available from the recently concluded troubles in the west, trouble started here. Not before, and again, not after 2002. Trouble erupted again, during a vacuum in the Pakistani system.

That's not true at all... There insurgency started since 1948 when the Kashmiris fought the terrorist forces and freed the part of Kashmir called Azad Kashmir (free Kashmir) while the rest stays occupied by indian occupation forces and is known as Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IOJ&K)

 

[Joe Shearer]

No .. i say listen to their voice .. listen what they want .. why you are using brutal force .. being a muslim i do care for muslims right?

You have to come to this with clean hands. Check your own record first. And being secular, I do not care for a religious pressure, to bring men, women and children under the regressive rule of a particular religion.

 

[American Pakistani]

Death to 7 lakh indian occupier terrorists.

 

[Joe Shearer]

At least it can kill Indian caste system and other social illnesses once and for all and lay a good social and cultural foundation for future fast development.

I understand that it is - or was - a key tenet of Maoist doctrine that each state must follow its own national model for development. Has that been eliminated by further research and refinement?

 

[Arsalan 345]

MR.nehru promised to solve this kashmir issue which means that india wanted to solve this problem but india has changed everything after nehru death.there are people in india who still abuse nehru for china war.indian stand that this is a bilateral issue means that it will never be solved because india don't want to solve it.insurgency in kashmir is not new and kashmir is not any internal issue of india.if it's internal issue,than nehru was wrong but unfortunately,nehru was honest and he realized that kashmir will become a headache and now we are here,in the 21st century,and still there is no solution for kashmir.

 

[Max]

Only when you give back the P-O-K

No we are not required to give back anything to you . We we're asked to remove our Nationals and keep minimum force for law and order, same as bharat.. ask Joe

 

[Joe Shearer]

It's free time for ganga swine's to kill as much Kashmiri as they want, bcoz Pakistani leaders are impotent.

True. They are impotent swine.

 

[Nilu Pule]

Side effects of Hindutva

 

[Joe Shearer]

So the million occupiers are funded from mandirs?

No idea what you are talking about. What million and what mandirs?

 

[Max]

True. They are impotent swine.

On that I agree, one was frisked on airport just few days ago..

 

[HariPrasad]

Tibet and Xinjiang are two most traveled attraction hotspots, nice and peaceful, modern and prosperous, check youtube vidoes made by foreign travelers to find it out.

Hummmm we know very well how the people are gundown and others are hanged with one week trial. We in democracy can notndo It and we always try to reconcile. We can not be like totalatarian regime who has a right to kill people at their will. China.

 

[Joe Shearer]

That's not true at all... There insurgency started since 1948 when the Kashmiris fought the terrorist forces and freed the part of Kashmir called Azad Kashmir (free Kashmir) while the rest stay occupied by indian occupation forces and is known as Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IOJ&K)

In India, they are known as Azad Kashmir and as the state of Jammu and Kashmir. The insurgency started in areas that have nothing to do with the Vale of Kashmir and stayed out of the Indian Union due to the support given to it by the Dominion of Pakistan. The records speak for themselves; there was peace thereafter, until 1989.

Death to 7 lakh indian occupier terrorists.

Ah, welcome back, Mr. 7 lakh Indian occupiers!

 

[Eagle_Nest]

You have to come to this with clean hands. Check your own record first. And being secular, I do not care for a religious pressure, to bring men, women and children under the regressive rule of a particular religion.

What is the secular point here.. i said all must be set as per their demands .. do you think they will go with India?aaaah your wet dreams