What's new

Analysis of Pakistan's WOT

PlanetWarrior

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
6,096
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
Zimbabwe
Ahmed Rashid: Fight for Waziristan's survival

The Pakistan military has been sleeping with the enemy
Ahmed Rashid / October 24, 2009, 0:25 IST



After nine suicide attacks in just 11 days that killed 160 people, including many from the security forces, the Pakistan Army has finally started its long-awaited offensive in South Waziristan where the Pakistani Taliban are based. The success of the offensive, against the backdrop of a serious civil-military division in Pakistan and unresolved debate in Washington, could be critical for the fate of Pakistan, which is financially broke and politically paralysed.



The army and the civilian government are once more at odds over the policy towards the US and India, the insurgency in Baluchistan, and how to deal with militant Punjabi groups that are linked to the Taliban. Moreover, still unresolved and now an issue of growing international concern is the sanctuary being given to Afghan Taliban in Pakistan.

Dozens of soldiers and police officers have been killed in suicide attacks from October 5 to 15 that included an embarrassing 22-hour siege of the army headquarters in Rawalpindi, the deaths of eight soldiers and three simultaneous attacks on police training camps and intelligence offices in Lahore. The attacks could have been designed to prevent or delay the expected army offensive on its stronghold, but they also aimed to topple the government, impose an Islamic state, and, if possible, get hold of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons.

The recent attacks have proved more deadly than those in the past because they took place in three of the country’s four provinces, involving not just Taliban tribesmen from the Pashtun ethnic group, but extremist Punjabi and Kashmiri factions which were until recently trained by the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) to fight Indian forces in Kashmir.

Moreover, several within the militant leadership had direct connections with the army or the ISI. The so-called Dr Usman, the leader of the nine-man group that attacked the army’s general headquarters on October 10, was himself a member of the army’s medical corps. Police officials say that the Rawalpindi and Lahore attacks had help from inside because the terrorists were able to bypass the stringent security measures in place and had knowledge of the layout of the complexes.

While the armed forces are unwilling to admit what many Pakistanis now believe — that there is some degree of penetration by extremist sympathisers within their ranks — the civilian government refuses to admit that the largest province of Punjab, especially its poverty-hit southern part, has become a major, new recruiting ground for militants.

The Punjab provincial government is run by Shabaz Sharif, the brother of Nawaz Sharif. The Sharif brothers, who ruled the country twice in the 1990s, are known to have close ties with the leaders of several militant groups, including Hafez Saeed, the leader of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, whose militants carried out the massacre in Mumbai last year.

Saeed, wanted by India and Interpol, has been freed twice from jails in Punjab on account of lack of evidence to hold him. The Sharifs have refused repeated requests by the Americans, British, Indians and the federal government to crack down on militancy in south Punjab, where it is strong and providing recruits for the Taliban.

Meanwhile, the federal government has suffered increasingly fraught relations with the army. Last week, at the height of the suicide attacks, army chief General Ashfaq Pervaiz Kayani chose that moment to blast the civilian government for agreeing to a $7.5-billion, five-year aid package from the US for civilian and developmental purposes.

The army was furious that the government had agreed to US-imposed conditions, which only insisted that there be civilian control of the army, democracy be maintained and the fight against extremism continued. The army, with its deep tentacles in the Pakistani media and among opposition politicians, whipped up a storm of public opinion against the deal, with some commentators accusing the government of President Asif Ali Zardari of treason.

Neither the army nor the politicians seemed to notice that the country was nearly bankrupt, barely subsisting on life support loans from the International Monetary Fund of $11.3 billion. Pakistan has been holding out a begging bowl for the past year, while factories, farms and schools are shutting down because of a chronic shortage of electricity, which is off in major cities for up to 10 hours a day.

The civilian government has also tried repeatedly to end the long running separatist insurgency in Baluchistan province by declaring ceasefires and the promise to hold talks with insurgent leaders. However, Baluch leaders accuse the army of sabotaging any such political reconciliation by continuing to assassinate or carry out forced disappearances of Baluch activists.

Meanwhile, as the policy review over Afghanistan and Pakistan continues in the White House, both the army and the government are being directly accused by US officials of continuing to harbour the Afghan Taliban leadership. As long as only British and Canadian troops in Helmand and Kandahar faced the effects of the Taliban’s safe sanctuaries in Pakistan’s Baluchistan province, the former Bush administration was quiet. But now that there are over 10,000 US marines there who are taking casualties, the Obama administration has made the sanctuary issue a major plank in its future relations with Pakistan.

But the dithering in Washington over the future of the US policy towards Afghanistan is leading to greater justification by Pakistan and other neighbours of Afghanistan to hedge their bets for the future in case the Americans withdraw or reduce their commitment by backing once again their favourite Afghan proxies just as they did during the 1990s civil war. Pakistan has been saving the Afghan Taliban leadership for just such an eventuality. But now Iran, Russia, India and the Central Asian states are all looking at their future in the country in the light of a US lack of resolve to stay the course in Afghanistan.

However, it is the worsening relations between the civilians and the military over domestic issues that are causing growing consternation at home. It is unlikely that General Kayani would like to overthrow the civilian government, but the army is resisting any attempt by the civilians to change the broad ambit of foreign or domestic policy.

Zardari is known to want peace and trade with India, an end to interference in Afghanistan, improved ties with Iran and better relations with and more aid from the West to strengthen the country’s economy and democracy.

However, Zardari’s attempts to build up public support for these logical civil demands have been stymied because of public disillusionment with the civilian government, which is considered to be corrupt, ineffective, incompetent and unwilling to rebuild moribund institutions of governance. The key to future stability is to bring the army, the civilian government and the opposition onto one page with a common agenda to fight extremism, while amicably resolving other internal disputes, but so far that looks extremely unlikely.

Sad analysis of Pakistan if correct :undecided:
 
.
Ahmed Rashid subscribes to the Hussain Haqqani club of blaming everything on the 'deep tentacles of the Army'.

"The army, with its deep tentacles in the Pakistani media and among opposition politicians, whipped up a storm of public opinion against the deal, with some commentators accusing the government of President Asif Ali Zardari of treason."

The media is free - if the Army's POV on the Kerry-Lugar Bill resonated with the media commentators and public, then the only one to blame is the Zardari Govt. for not being able to explain the benefits and conditions to Pakistanis properly.

Instead of recognizing that, we have resort to unsubstantiated rumor mongering of 'tentacles' and what not.

The Zardari government finds itself in a bind of its own making so far.
 
.
i really dont believe in anything that Mr Rashid says. he said the mission in swat would fail but look we have been successful. there are countless times when Mr Rashid has said things and they have turned out to be wrong most of the time. so i would advise most of the members here not to waste there time on this mans views on anything
 
.
Ahmed Rashid subscribes to the Hussain Haqqani club of blaming everything on the 'deep tentacles of the Army'.

"The army, with its deep tentacles in the Pakistani media and among opposition politicians, whipped up a storm of public opinion against the deal, with some commentators accusing the government of President Asif Ali Zardari of treason."

The media is free - if the Army's POV on the Kerry-Lugar Bill resonated with the media commentators and public, then the only one to blame is the Zardari Govt. for not being able to explain the benefits and conditions to Pakistanis properly.

Instead of recognizing that, we have resort to unsubstantiated rumor mongering of 'tentacles' and what not.

The Zardari government finds itself in a bind of its own making so far.

As a matter of curiousity why does the army COS make a statement relating to the civilian government's acceptance of the conditions imposed by the US government for civilian aid ? That is something which confuses me. If the COS of the army had misgivings and announced them about the KL Bill conditions relating to military spending then I could understand an announcement or denouncement by the army chief. Is it acceptable that the army denounces that the civilian government undertook that the democratic government will continue and that military takeover ruled out or is it simply that the report by Rashid is not factual? I have been confused about that issue since I read the post
 
.
The CoAS should have communicated to the GoP privately and not doing so is an anomaly in the Pakistani state of affairs. The other side of the coin could be that the Army communicated its concerns to the GoP and was ignored, and then decided to go public. In the Pakistan of today, nothing is beyond possibility.
 
.
Ahmed Rashid is from the small coward ultra-liberal extremist segment of our population. These people thrive on criticizing Pakistan, irrespective of right or wrong, as they have a lax moral code to begin with. They excel at hedging their bets, which is why this guy said that Pakistan would fail in Swat, so that if God forbid that really happened, he can go on TV and brag to the Western media how he predicted this all along. But no one will question him about being wrong on Swat an being wrong on everything else.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom