This article implicitly claimed that the author is rational and neutral by putting lots of references published by Pakistan medias at the end of the article, however he made a basic logic error. He is assuming that all references are logically correct and reliable. That's simply wrong. Most articles either lack of acknowledges from high ranked officials relevant with CPEC projects or just expressed various concerns from various Pakistan stakeholders, the latter is especially understandable.
However, whenever we try to understand the purpose of CPEC, we have to put this under a big picture of diplomatic relationship of these 2 nations.
Q1, which one is more important? 46 billions $ or the relationship of between Pakistan and China ? Will China force Pakistan to pay the debts if say, Pakistan had an economy crisis in future?
Q2, will the Chinese goods flood into Pakistan from Xinjiang, western China? (Please do basic investigation on Karakoram Highway and economy along this road before answer this question).
Q3, what's the big problems in Pakistan? How to deal with, or resolve the problems?
Q4, If the projects are successfully implemented, what's the impact to Pakistan and India respectively?
Q5, The role of Gwadar Port?
Q6 Why China pour big money in BD, Sri Lanka, SEA, Africa, this time, it's turn of Pakistan?
Q7 ...
It's a good method to understand the purpose of CPEC by raising questions. Lots of impractical delusions will be eradicated by this way.