An Indian Muslim Sheds light on Indian Secularism.

[A1Kaid]

LOOOOOOOL, the only tigers in Hyderabad are in Hyderabad Zoo, in Cages! Getting fed by the keepers and being gawked at by the visitors.......

This guy has some mental problem, he laughs at every little thing, I bet if you said his name he will laugh.

 

[Capt.Popeye]

This guy has some mental problem, he laughs at every little thing, I bet if you said his name he will laugh.

LOLLL, No, amigo. Its only you who can give me laffs.

 

[SamantK]

Did not know this was happening in Hyd.. barkas is one of the most infamous place in Hyd.. The TDP did well to clean the scum bags there, I hope it remains that way.

Coming to the topic, I'll be so happy that that the dhakkan does not get up.. Their family has been real trouble for everyone in the old city.. I have a friend there who curses them for the numerous riots and bandh's they start.

 

[Umair Nawaz]

This guy has some mental problem, he laughs at every little thing, I bet if you said his name he will laugh.

Soo right sir

 

[Capt.Popeye]

Soo right sir

See now; why are you ing.
That too ing @A1Kaid?

 

[India defense]

Another Indian Muslim sheds light on Indian Secularism to a Pakistani Journalist . He whacked her around . Javed made her look dumb .

Another one .

For some they are not true muslim...Owasi is true muslim

 

[Joe Shearer]

This guy has some mental problem, he laughs at every little thing, I bet if you said his name he will laugh.

One more insult to <shudder!> a Jr. TT member.

O the ignominy of it all!

 

[jaunty]

He was attacked by some criminals apparently due to some property dispute fallout. Oh yeah the attackers were Muslims too!



Victimhood point earned= 0

I am yet to understand this perpetual victimhood of muslims, esp on pdf. I mean they can fake anything to assume victimhood. They can stoop as low as posting earthquake, flood victims to spread their propaganda. Not sure what causes these guys to be such habitual liars.

 

[A1Kaid]

One more insult to <shudder!> a Jr. TT member.

O the ignominy of it all!

Glad to see you defending his low quality post, its actually an accurate description of this troubled member. Who in every one of his posts inserts "lol" "rofl" and multiple smilies and treating the forum as a chat room.

You think we give these kinds of people respect? You're at the wrong forum then.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Glad to see you defending his low quality post, its actually an accurate description of this troubled member. Who in every one of his posts inserts "lol" "rofl" and multiple smilies and treating the forum as a chat room.

You think we give these kinds of people respect? You're at the wrong forum then.

Do let me decide what I think and what I don't, before going on to decide for me if I am at the right forum or not.

I was not defending his post, merely drawing ironic attention to your hyper-sensitivity. If his post was low quality, did anyone force you to respond? In such circumstances, personally, sometimes I respond, sometimes I treat a poster and his post with the contempt they deserve, by ignoring them and moving on. When I respond, I do so knowing very well that a brawl might ensue, especially if the other chap is a thick-skinned beast, and does not know that he is in the wrong. Or does not care. And if I get into a brawl, I don't complain about being insulted; I go into it knowing that the chances I will be insulted are high, and I go in braced for it.

These are my principles, which cannot be forced on to anyone else, but I can certainly say to others that there might be a better way of handling provocations other than by drawing ourselves up to our full heights and and putting on the expression that John Master's camels put on, once the rifleman had had his way with them.

The post you are referring to was not high quality. Neither is this deliberately mischievous thread. Those who participate to support it have already nailed their colours to the mast. What remains for them to complain about?

 

[Joe Shearer]

I am putting this in a separate post, for emphasis.

This poster is one of the best. He has of late, over the last six months, been displaying frustration and anger, sometimes contempt, in his posts, features which were entirely absent earlier. It is for each of us to judge why this is so; for me, it is the strain of facing a war on two fronts, a war waged on us by both the Internet Hindus and their equally venomous counterparts, the Internet Muslims. It troubles me to the core that people who are not fit to tie his shoelaces have the temerity to make slighting remarks about him and his alleged propensity to troll, with not the slightest effort at understanding the pressures that he, I and others who consider ourselves decent human beings devoid of some of the excessive jingoism and hyper-national tendencies so regrettably on display otherwise.

Before you judge him, match him.

 

[notsuperstitious]

I am yet to understand this perpetual victimhood of muslims, esp on pdf. I mean they can fake anything to assume victimhood. They can stoop as low as posting earthquake, flood victims to spread their propaganda. Not sure what causes these guys to be such habitual liars.

Every agressor, every imperialist needs a story for expansionism, externally to justify, internally to rally troops.

At the accusations at capt popeye, what a freaking joke by a ''think tank'' that thinks a rambling hate monger now passes judgement on concepts of coexistence, its like saying how a 15 year old talibani suicide bomber sheds light on jinnah's pakistan. Even on popeye's worst day, the think tank does not come to his ankles.

 

[Umair Nawaz]

See now; why are you ing.
That too ing @A1Kaid?

I know u indians r too jealous people.

 

[Joe Shearer]

I know u indians r too jealous people.

The day the knowledge of an adolescent, expressed in unkempt and slovenly language, influences our opinions, or their expression, it will be time to find other options of seeking to build bridges between two deeply riven people.

 

[Umair Nawaz]

Do let me decide what I think and what I don't, before going on to decide for me if I am at the right forum or not.

I was not defending his post, merely drawing ironic attention to your hyper-sensitivity. If his post was low quality, did anyone force you to respond? In such circumstances, personally, sometimes I respond, sometimes I treat a poster and his post with the contempt they deserve, by ignoring them and moving on. When I respond, I do so knowing very well that a brawl might ensue, especially if the other chap is a thick-skinned beast, and does not know that he is in the wrong. Or does not care. And if I get into a brawl, I don't complain about being insulted; I go into it knowing that the chances I will be insulted are high, and I go in braced for it.

These are my principles, which cannot be forced on to anyone else, but I can certainly say to others that there might be a better way of handling provocations other than by drawing ourselves up to our full heights and and putting on the expression that John Master's camels put on, once the rifleman had had his way with them.

The post you are referring to was not high quality. Neither is this deliberately mischievous thread. Those who participate to support it have already nailed their colours to the mast. What remains for them to complain about?

Really,

Do u know yr just trying to act too smart then actually u r.
Remember last time we had argument u started complaining when i used the words old man n baba g for u.

And now yr saying u dont complain.