What's new

Amid Sikkim stand-off, Chinese army demonstrates battle-readiness with armoured drill in Tibet

CAD

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 9, 2017
Messages
608
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
HIGHLIGHTS
  • The exercises were being carried at an altitude of 5,100 metres.
  • Besides testing the new equipment, the exercises involve conducting live firing exercises.
  • The simulation also involves offensive and defensive training.
59477223.jpg


Reuters file photo used for representation.
BEIJING: Amid border standoff with India, China's People's Liberation Army has started showing off its battle-readiness by holding an armored brigade drill at an altitude of 5,100 meters in the border region of Tibet.

The country's official Xinhua news agency said that the drill would test "full combat readiness" of Type 96B which is China's most advanced battle tank.

Displaying photographs of the tank, Xinhua said that the drills were aimed at "carrying out battlefield environment analysis, combat operations command, combat coordination and other real combat and live-fire shooting training". :yahoo:

Military experts had earlier said that Chinese forces have difficulties in ensuring perfect coordination and battle integration. This is one reason why PLA commands and divisions have been thoroughly revamped in the recent years. The government insists of conducting regular military exercises with forces of other countries. There have been joint exercises with the Indian military as well.

Experts are also asking if China is holding the drill to instill confidence in its forces to fight in high altitude. This may be the first time it is holding a drill in the "complex high altitude environment of the Tibetan plateau," as Xinhua described it. :dance3:

"Militarily, given the geography, logistics, possible weapon deployments and a vigilant Indian Army, China cannot give India a bloody nose over Doklam standoff," Brahma Chellaney, author and professor of stratetic studies at the Center for Policy Research in New Delhi told TOI. "If anything, if it attacks+ , it might suffer a military reverse".

Canvassing the opposite point of view, a retired PLA general, Zhu Heping, said Indian troops would not be able to stop China's road construction in Doklam+ . India has resisted attempts by Chinese troops to build the road in Doklam, which is claimed both by China and Bhutan. :dance3:

"India's trespass shows its stance to China. Actually, it is a very small and narrow area where troops of a large scale cannot be fully deployed," Major General Zhu (retired) said.

"Do you think a few military vehicles and soldiers on the border will stop China's development and its border construction?" he asked. "The Chinese military is becoming stronger and stronger and leaving the Indian military farther behind. India's provocation won't affect the general situation or take any effect." :dance3:

Chinese attempt to construct the road in Doklam area, which is claimed by both China and Bhutan+ , is what triggered the stand-off since June 16. India has resisted attempts by Chinese troops to build the road, which leads to a military area of Bhutan and does not serve any economic purpose.

The Xinhua report said that the drill also aimed at "paying close attention to officers command skills training, command and control systems, combat unit synthesis and combat readiness". It did not explain when the drills began and where in Tibet.


Chinese military experts are trying to analyze and find weak spots in Indian military capabilities. :dance3:




"India's military has more experience in mountain combat, but it has at least three key weaknesses," Song Zhongping, a retired official of the PLA Rocket Force, said.



"First, its weapons are mostly imported, so how could it maintain supply after if it engages in total war with China? Second, its logistics are poor, because its plan to build 73 highways for military logistics by 2020 is only a third complete. And third, its weapons (from different countries) aren't compatible in one comprehensive combat system and its long-range missiles are not accurate at all," he said. :cheers::cheesy::china::pakistan::sniper::guns:




Chelleney said India must be ready for a long psychological battle with China. "It is unfortunate that some Indian journalists and analysts, by disseminating Chinese disinformation without seeking to verify facts or uphold basic standards of objectivity, are unwillingly becoming handmaidens of China's psychological war against India and Bhutan," he said.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...mored-drill-in-tibet/articleshow/59477053.cms
 
.
Lmao, its high time Eleven and co try their luck in Bollywood, such drama queens, these clowns will surely give the Kapoors, Khans and Roshans a run for their money.

BTW the amount of zeal and devotion the cheerleaders here shower for their masters, if they had utilized even a fourth of this passion for the benefit of their own country, Pakistan would have been a much much better place to live today.
 
.
"First, its weapons are mostly imported, so how could it maintain supply after if it engages in total war with China? Second, its logistics are poor, because its plan to build 73 highways for military logistics by 2020 is only a third complete. And third, its weapons (from different countries) aren't compatible in one comprehensive combat system and its long-range missiles are not accurate at all," he said. :cheers::cheesy::china::pakistan::sniper::guns:

Why India is poor at making its own weapons?

There are two broad reasons why India fails so miserably to become more self-reliant in arms production.


One is a superstructure of inefficiency that is held in place by corruption and inertia. The Tatra truck deal has long been a byword in arms procurement incompetence. Over 25 years, the Indian army bought 7000 trucks from the Czech Republic at roughly double the cost they are sold in their home country. :lol:

The indigenization rate was so poor the trucks do not have right-hand drive to this day. General VK Singh's claim he was offered Rs 140 million to keep India buying Tatras would explain why this absurd state of affairs existed for as long as it did. :lol:



 
.


Why India is poor at making its own weapons?

There are two broad reasons why India fails so miserably to become more self-reliant in arms production.


One is a superstructure of inefficiency that is held in place by corruption and inertia. The Tatra truck deal has long been a byword in arms procurement incompetence. Over 25 years, the Indian army bought 7000 trucks from the Czech Republic at roughly double the cost they are sold in their home country. :lol:

The indigenization rate was so poor the trucks do not have right-hand drive to this day. General VK Singh's claim he was offered Rs 140 million to keep India buying Tatras would explain why this absurd state of affairs existed for as long as it did. :lol:


Buddy, you people can't even produce a decent two wheeler and lecturing about mass production, lol. At least we don't buy off the shelf, do paint job and claim as our own.
 
Last edited:
. .
I am sure they are doing the surveillance of them. India needs to be prepared for any incursion. More over India is holding heights.
 
. .
I am sure they are doing the surveillance of them. India needs to be prepared for any incursion. More over India is holding heights.

What about Chinese incursion: Troops built temporary shelters in Arunachal Pradesh and then Chinese troops would reluctant to leave the place and claims that the territory belongs to them, as our iron brothers are saying right and true this territory belongs to them, and well so AP and Sikkim too is.

Back off, before it's too late and India would lose both AP and Sikkim, like what happened to AC. :lol::enjoy:
 
.
What about Chinese incursion: Troops built temporary shelters in Arunachal Pradesh and then Chinese troops would reluctant to leave the place and claims that the territory belongs to them, as our iron brothers are saying right and true this territory belongs to them, and well so AP and Sikkim too is.

Back off, before it's too late and India would lose both AP and Sikkim, like what happened to AC. :lol::enjoy:


Desperate Chuchundar/Rodents must stay away when two elephants clash, this advisory was generated by ISPR for their own enlightenment. Please read it, it was posted on this forum only.
 
.
Desperate Chuchundar/Rodents must stay away when two elephants clash, this advisory was generated by ISPR for their own enlightenment. Please read it, it was posted on this forum only.

Yes, India is a rodent in front of Pakistan and China can be easily crushed and sandwiched when two front war started, your ADGPI IHQ of MoD Army knows this very well, you can feel the shivering right in front of you of your own Bipin Rawat, fearing of two front war and then India is gone.

It is getting boring now. A month has passed away and China is still there with their rants. Cheerleaders are digging every news site to pick out an article to soothe their false ego. Nothing gonna happen cheer leaders and god forbid if it happens then China will take the beating it will remember for decades to come.

Don't worry China had announced it has ‘standardised’ official names for six places in the Northeastern state of Arunachal Pradesh, just worry about Sikkim also i think if India didn't back off soon both of AP and Sikkim is gone forever.:enjoy: :lol:
 
.
What about Chinese incursion: Troops built temporary shelters in Arunachal Pradesh and then Chinese troops would reluctant to leave the place and claims that the territory belongs to them, as our iron brothers are saying right and true this territory belongs to them, and well so AP and Sikkim too is.
Lol Your Iron Bother claims that SCS is chinese water but there claim is Rejected by International court and community

Lol US Navy And JAPAN violate SCS At there Will All your Iron brother can Do is only issue empty warning like they doing here
Back off, before it's too late and India would lose both AP and Sikkim, like what happened to AC.
Seriously Which world you Live in bozo its not 19th century Were Territories can be invade at Will:lol::lol:

Its Modern Era and international Relation and geopolitics is Marched very head ahead in these times

Chinese Would Invade Arunachal lol Sikkim if they have capability they have Done it by know:disagree::disagree:

Lol no one can invade a State Which alien To them Lol Chinese don't have ball invade Taiwan Let alone Arunachal sikkim:omghaha::omghaha:Who are Very different culturally And Linguistically

Look At Us in Afghanistan :D


What Do you think US Nato Will Do Sit Idol They Will Add Another Gem in there Camp like japan south korea:usflag:

You Pakistani Will only get Orgasms on forum but reality is very Far
 
Last edited:
.
None of the warningz come with a time limit.
All open ended warnings.
Yaar jab time ho to leave our territory.
 
.
What about Chinese incursion: Troops built temporary shelters in Arunachal Pradesh and then Chinese troops would reluctant to leave the place and claims that the territory belongs to them, as our iron brothers are saying right and true this territory belongs to them, and well so AP and Sikkim too is.

Back off, before it's too late and India would lose both AP and Sikkim, like what happened to AC. :lol::enjoy:


I am tired of cheerleaders dancing around. .. :drag:
 
.
Lol at these cheerleaders.
Your so called iron brother has got territorial disputes with all of its neighbours.
They claim absolutely everything as the own saying about ancient maps and conflicts.
 
.
None of the warningz come with a time limit.
All open ended warnings.
Yaar jab time ho to leave our territory.
@NKVD
Maybe a lesson for RSS Modi to stop licking Trumps shoes and respect neighbors like China, Pakistan Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh and Bhutan a lot more. :lol:

Areas along the Indian side are not amenable to mechanised warfare, except certain parts of Ladakh and Sikkim.” The high elevation of Tibet gives China some “commanding advantages” for surveillance, artillery operations and acclimatisation of troops to high altitudes.

High altitude and extreme cold affect “almost every element of military equipment”; they complicate air campaigns and battle plans.

Third, is the infrastructure disparity between the two sides. The People’s Liberation Army has rapid access to the Line of Actual Control (LAC) thanks to the terrain and highways and high-speed railway networks it has built whereas Indian troops “often have to trek several hours, if not days, to attain certain areas.”:rofl::rofl:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom