What's new

American attack aftermath: Pakistan declares attack a 'plot'

This attack could be a means of instigating a military coup, to create discontent in the Army ranks against Kayani, especially because Kayani is perceived to be 'larger than life' here in the US. And Kayani is under pressure to hit back hard, just like the government is under pressure as well to react to this.
The government is going to do nothing other than rhetoric - it'll throw the military under the bus - Zardari and company will secretly be telling the US that they don't care about the attack but have to make statements for public consumption, and that the 'military needs to be brought under control'.
 
This attack on a PA headquarters... not once... but they came twice.... is the last nail in NATOs coffin... Afghan war just took a new turn... one tht USA will regret!
 
The government is going to do nothing other than rhetoric - it'll throw the military under the bus - Zardari and company will secretly be telling the US that they don't care about the attack but have to make statements for public consumption, and that the 'military needs to be brought under control'.

But I think Kayani might be under pressure from people in the Army ranks itself to hit back at the US.
 
The government is going to do nothing other than rhetoric - it'll throw the military under the bus - Zardari and company will secretly be telling the US that they don't care about the attack but have to make statements for public consumption, and that the 'military needs to be brought under control'.

And whom do you blame for that Kiyani anyway has 3 more years?
 
All said and done please release poof we have fuc.ped., till than relax
28 dead Pakistani soldiers on TWO POSTS and a NATO admission that it was their forces that did it is PROOF ENOUGH, especially given the long trail of thousands of dead bodies that were the result of 'NATO responding to fire from wedding parties, funeral processions, festivals and kids playing in fields'.
 
This attack could be a means of instigating a military coup, to create discontent in the Army ranks against Kayani, especially because Kayani is perceived to be 'larger than life' here in the US. And Kayani is under pressure to hit back hard, just like the government is under pressure as well to react to this.

There could be several possibilities some of them are as follows.

1. Coup against Kiyani
2. Coup against Zardari
3. Coup against all above

but one thing is sure whoever is behind this dirty game has planned it for a long time and all the pieces are falling into place.

But one thing is for sure NATO is like a gang of drunk youths with a high tendency of anti-social behavior.
 
Anyways Pakistan is one unfortunate country. Politicians are a sell out as in many other third world countries. But the worst part is that even the Military and establishment of this country who were supposed to protect the national interest of this country have sold themselves for dollars.
 
sir this will never happen...you know...it did it in the past...they did now and they will do it again.....when a musharfe isnt willing to lay down his life cause his children study aboad and he loves the intoxicating smell of a brand new green dollar bill...then such gay inquiries and apologies wont serve any purpose.....Correct response is to shove a Babur Cruise Missile up bagram airbase's arse.....anything less would be useless...but i think this is too much....harame musharfees want to chill....they dont care whether 28 sons of soil die or 280.....what matters to them is how many dollars they receive each month for killing and allowing killing of their fellow countrymen.
If NATO argues that this was a 'mistaken strike on a border position' then Pakistan does not have any justification for 'launching cruise missiles at US forces' deliberately.

NATO would argue their attack was a mistake, whereas a Pakistani attack along the lines of what you suggest would be an 'Act of War'.

There must be a response from Pakistan beyond rhetoric, but that does not mean we resort to foolish and stupid actions.
 
But I think Kayani might be under pressure from people in the Army ranks itself to hit back at the US.
The best the Pak Mil can do outside of an 'Act of War' would be to deploy whatever AA defenses (capable of posing a threat to NATO air assets) it can with its border posts, and end drone attacks and take the issue to the UN.

My point however is that the Pak Mil position is going to be undermined by the current GoP leadership that will be telling the US that 'we want to continue cooperating with you but the military won't let us ...'.
 
Are we coming back to the Zardari agenda? Maybe PPP told NATO to come and do destruction so they could try and make an excuse to sack kayani's leadership in army. Is this possible?
 
28 dead Pakistani soldiers on TWO POSTS and a NATO admission that it was their forces that did it is PROOF ENOUGH, especially given the long trail of thousands of dead bodies that were the result of 'NATO responding to fire from wedding parties, funeral processions, festivals and kids playing in fields'.

28 soldier kiled in Friendly Fire, done and i am sad, no guess why?
Punish the guilty i am on your side, no guess why?

Is DG ISPR, telling the truth? Sorry I will take a rain check as OBL never lived in Abbotabad?
 
If NATO argues that this was a 'mistaken strike on a border position' then Pakistan does not have any justification for 'launching cruise missiles at US forces' deliberately.

NATO would argue their attack was a mistake, whereas a Pakistani attack along the lines of what you suggest would be an 'Act of War'.

There must be a response from Pakistan beyond rhetoric, but that does not mean we resort to foolish and stupid actions.

The GOP will shiver to death at the idea of launching a lipstick at NATO.

GOP will continue making halwa until NATO arrives in Islamabad and after that
the GOP will be dragged like gaddafi on the streets of Islamabad by nato backed islamist radicals.
 
Is DG ISPR, telling the truth? Sorry I will take a rain check as OBL never lived in Abbotabad?
Been over this plenty of times - why should the DG ISPR have known OBL lived in Abbottabad? Pakistan provided critical intelligence that led to the US finding OBL, it is the US that chose to deceive and backstab the PA and ISI by not sharing intelligence it developed from the information provided by Pakistan.

Again, resorting to canards to hijack from the arguments being made.
 
Back
Top Bottom