American attack aftermath: Pakistan declares attack a 'plot'

[Safriz]

Germany urges Pakistan to attend Afghan talks

you know why they are all insisting pakistan to go to bonn....because if pakistan wont be there who will they blame for their monumental failure...
To them pakistan is not an important ally...its the most important escape goat.

 

[VelocuR]

How about vacate Jacobabad Airbases after Shamsi Airbases? Any US drones deploying there?

 

[VCheng]

Show me one 'official NATO claim'.....................

Let's wait for December 23rd, shall we?

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Let's wait for December 23rd, shall we?

No.

The facts are pretty clear as detailed by Pakistan so far.

A bunch of lies and propaganda out of NATO is not going to change that.

It does not take a month to interview/interrogate the individuals involved in the actions that occurred, and as Pakistan has pointed out, nothing came of the earlier investigations that occurred into prior incidents of 'friendly fire'.

 

[fatman17]

If incident lasted for so long... why didn't pakistan send the reinforcement ? There is a question mark on the Operational capabilities of PA.

you want us to start a WAR with the US? if they were indian assets, you would have seen a different reaction!

 

[tony singh]

Show me one 'official NATO claim'.

The link in my earlier post goes to a post listing an OFFICIAL and DETAILED Pakistani account of what transpired during the attack.

NATO are going to investigate the incident, they will not give the 'official' version according to them just yet but im sure they will once it has been completed.

However will anyone in Nato put their hands up and say yes it was deliberate? I can't see that happening they will try to cover their backs and say it was a accident or that they were met with fire and in the process they acted in self defence.

 

[mjnaushad]

NATO are going to investigate the incident, they will not give the 'official' version according to them just yet but im sure they will once it has been completed.

However will anyone in Nato put their hands up and say yes it was deliberate? I can't see that happening they will try to cover their backs and say it was a accident or that they were met with fire and in the process they acted in self defence.

We are not expecting anything different.......

 

[VCheng]

.........................and the posts themselves were about 300-400 metres inside Pakistan borders.........

So NOT 2.5 km inside, as was initially claimed?

More details will show the story to be not as simple as initially thought.

 

[VCheng]

No.

The facts are pretty clear as detailed by Pakistan so far.

A bunch of lies and propaganda out of NATO is not going to change that.

It does not take a month to interview/interrogate the individuals involved in the actions that occurred, and as Pakistan has pointed out, nothing came of the earlier investigations that occurred into prior incidents of 'friendly fire'.

Already, the Pakistani claim of the posts being 2.5 km inside the borders has been shown to be false. It would be better to wait for the NATO report too, I think.

 

[Safriz]

Already, the Pakistani claim of the posts being 2.5 km inside the borders has been shown to be false. It would be better to wait for the NATO report too, I think.

Shown to be false by who?

If NATO was that truthful they wouldn't have changed their statement over and over again...Pakistan has shown the destroyed check post which is 2.5 Km inside borders.
And do you still believe that NATO will come up with a non biased independent investigation report? Stop living in fools paradise my dear sir.

 

[tony singh]

I might be going off topic but i fail to understand one thing why would NATO do this on purpose? this will hurt their cause much more just look at the reaction of Pakistan in not attending the Bonn meeting.


Is NATO this stupid? is the question

 

[SQ8]

So NOT 2.5 km inside, as was initially claimed?

More details will show the story to be not as simple as initially thought.

But were clearly defined and positions conveyed to both CENTCOM and ISAF.

However.. the idea that after the communique between PA and the US forces about this being a friendly fire incident the choppers left.. and then RETURNED seems weird.
Was there a breakdown in the chain of command within the ISAF?
Was it just trigger happy US forces having fun?
Or were some Afghan Army forces taking advantage of the confusion to have the US attack us??
The US investigation better be very through..

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

So NOT 2.5 km inside, as was initially claimed?

More details will show the story to be not as simple as initially thought.

Was the 2.5KM detail in the media or and official claim by the ISPR or PA?

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Already, the Pakistani claim of the posts being 2.5 km inside the borders has been shown to be false. It would be better to wait for the NATO report too, I think.

As I asked you elsewhere - did the DG ISPR make the 2.5Km claim and retract it, or was that promoted by the media?

 

[fatman17]

How it leads to a war with US ? wern't your soldiers firing on the NATO or were just sitting ducks ? Tomorrow if US do the same thing would you again put the same argument ? Come on they were pounding your post with impunity for more than 2 hrs that itself qualified as a war against Pakistan. I am not inciting you but the question will remain that what PA did to secure their invaluable assets ?

they were not - it was unprovoked.

---------- Post added at 07:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:12 PM ----------

Was the 2.5KM detail in the media or and official claim by the ISPR or PA?

the posts were 200-300meters from the border

---------- Post added at 07:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:13 PM ----------

But were clearly defined and positions conveyed to both CENTCOM and ISAF.

However.. the idea that after the communique between PA and the US forces about this being a friendly fire incident the choppers left.. and then RETURNED seems weird.
Was there a breakdown in the chain of command within the ISAF?
Was it just trigger happy US forces having fun?
Or were some Afghan Army forces taking advantage of the confusion to have the US attack us??
The US investigation better be very through..

thats my guess/bet