Jango
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2010
- Messages
- 21,530
- Reaction score
- 99
- Country
- Location
Yes, you are right. The ISPR's main point with respect to the sleeping part is, they (soldiers at the posts) were fired upon unprovoked (after all how can they provoke the enemy, when they are asleep?).
You are very right in assessing that, and with the same assessment I raised the question about the sleeping part that how can they be asleep when flares were fired 30 minutes before the shooting started. (Relating to the account of injured soldiers)
I questioned that part, and I have been questioning all the questionable parts, only to help people understand that all the accounts we heard yet make it for a very confusing incident at this point of time.
And that the incident is not as simple as it looks, so we should reserve our emotion laden conclusions against any of parties involved - Pakistan/NATO/US/Taliban.
Well, my appeal goes out to all the Pakistanis, Americans, Afghans, and Indians too in here.
The spotting of illumination flares at a distance, and the flying of helis at night is not unheard of in that area.
The duty NCO might have recorded that with the Company havaldar or somebody, but he might have made nothing of it.
After all it is not possible to differentiate between a PA heli and NATo heli with the naked eye at night.
But I agree with you that the full details are not out yet, and they might not even come in the NATO investigation, so keep up the amazement.