What's new

Allahabad Univ VC can sleep better, Mosque reduces Azaan volume

No I think that is bs.

Temples are channels of energy.

Always have been.

Hindus are only now beginning to slowly unapologetically go back to some of the traditional orthodox tenets of their religion.

For too long they have been fed and subliminally accepted that theirs is a free for all faith without dogma and open to everything.

Cheers, Doc
I think temples are a place of worship as you have mentioned.
Although I do not like the idea of stopping anyone from entering a temple. God does not discriminate among people. Only thing is that anyone entering needs to behave well while in the premises.
 
.
It's happening, glad to see it too.. despite me not being religious at all.

"paani peene aaya tha" is also a lie, they just want to test and see how far they can push it.. but aaj kal, they push, we shove, they patharbaazi, we goleybaazi + bumbaari. :enjoy:

@xeuss and his lot better get used to it, or not.. keep crying.. even better. :smokin:

Over the years I learned that the unbridled hatred of Muslims was the defining factor of Hindus. You two statements above exemplify this. You do not care about temples or religious worship, but get absolutely delighted at the opportunity to deny some perceived benefit to Muslims - to put them in their as place as it is said.
 
.
I think temples are a place of worship as you have mentioned.
Although I do not like the idea of stopping anyone from entering a temple. God does not discriminate among people. Only thing is that anyone entering needs to behave well while in the premises.

Its not about what you a 21st century Hindu likes.

What are the traditional Hindu laws on entry into temples by non Hindu blood?

Remember, traditionally historically over thousands of years, everyone was Hindu.

So non Hindu blood essentially meant foreign alien blood.

Mlecchas.

Us.

Allowed?

I think not. And rightly so.

Cheers, Doc
 
. .
Its not about what you a 21st century Hindu likes.
What are the traditional Hindu laws on entry into temples by non Hindu blood?
Since we are living in 21st century, obviously 21st century Hindus will decide who are allowed in Hindu places of worship. Hinduism is ever-evolving and ever-correcting itself. We dont follow a tradition just for the heck of it. We think what makes sense, debate about it and follow what is the outcome of the debate.
 
.
And funnily Iranian brothers tell me that you guys are probably the only people on earth who understand militant Islam well.

tell those Iranians that it is too late now

both for them and these new "experts" of militant Islam

Also share this with them :lol:

Capture.PNG
 
.
tell those Iranians that it is too late now

both for them and these new "experts" of militant Islam

Also share this with them :lol:

View attachment 727087

I'll tell them you said this.

Cheers, Doc
Since we are living in 21st century, obviously 21st century Hindus will decide who are allowed in Hindu places of worship. Hinduism is ever-evolving and ever-correcting itself. We dont follow a tradition just for the heck of it. We think what makes sense, debate about it and follow what is the outcome of the debate.

Exactly so.

And Hindus in 21st century Uttarakhand seem to have decided rightly I feel.

Cheers, Doc
 
.
Suddenly its azan.
Economic issues, solved.
Law and order issues, solved.
Internal politics in order.
Only azan is remaining to be fixed.

Also banning beef will make the 'India 2030' dream come true !
Over the years I learned that the unbridled hatred of Muslims was the defining factor of Hindus. You two statements above exemplify this. You do not care about temples or religious worship, but get absolutely delighted at the opportunity to deny some perceived benefit to Muslims - to put them in their as place as it is said.

Expect things to get much worse, as communalism always got BJP votes.
 
.
Also banning beef will make the 'India 2030' dream come true !

We still eat beef.

But I must admit all the spitting videos last year have seriously put me off my favourite Muslim joints (always accepted their dicey hygiene as a guy who's eaten and drunk bindaas across the country all his life and developed innate immunity).

Cheers, Doc
 
.
Indian Muslims being targeted just as Jinnah predicted and warned

More important than ever to fight back

islam is peaceful religion , it teaches how to practice islam without disturbing your neighbours .
Prof. Sangita Srivastava had complained to DM that her sleep was disturbed due to loud azaan
Sabrangindia19 Mar 2021

Allahabad%20Univ.jpg
Image Courtesy:thewire.in
Allahabad University’s vice-chancellor Prof. Sangita Srivastava had had her wish of uninterrupted morning slumber come true, as the mosque committee of Lal Mosque, has now decided to reduce the volume by 50 percent, and also change the direction of the speaker away from her house, reported The Wire. Prof. Sangita Srivastava had written to District Magistrate Bhanu Chandra Goswami complaining that she was forced to wake up too early every day, due to the azaan being recited on a loudspeaker. She urged the DM to take action as her “sleep [gets] so disturbed [that it] does not resume even after trying very hard.”

Her complaint soon went viral and she was quoted as writing that her “disturbed” sleep “also results in a headache throughout the day, causing losses in working hours”. The VC claimed that she is not against any religion, and suggested that the azaan can be recited even without a loudspeaker. However, she also complained about the announcement of sehri, the morning meal consumed by Muslims in the month of Ramzan, stated the news report.

“Your freedom ends where my nose begins,” Srivastava wrote adding, “I am not against any religion, caste or creed, they may perform the Azan without the mike so that others are not disturbed. Even before Eid, they announce Sehri on the mike at 4.00 am. This practice also creates disturbance to other people.” She cited an Allahabad high court judgement from 2020 in her letter that said azaan was an essential part of Islam, but not its recitation through the use of loudspeakers.

According to news reports it was in January 2020, that the Allahabad High Court had ruled that no religion advocates the use of loudspeakers for worship. The petitioner had challenged an administrative order in the Jaunpur district of Uttar Pradesh where use of loudspeaker for azaan had been banned. The high court had said, “No religion prescribes that prayers are required to be performed through voice amplifiers or by beating of drums If there is such a practice, it should not adversely affect rights of the others, including that of not being disturbed.” The details of the Allahabad HC ruling may be read here. The court was hearing a plea by Ghazipur MP Afzal Ansari Congress Leader Salman Khurshid and senior advocate S Wasim A Qadri. A division bench comprising Justices Shashikant Gupta and Ajit Kumar ruled that azaan may be recited by the muezzin from mosque minarets “by human voice without using any amplifying device and the administration is directed not to cause hindrance… unless such guidelines are being violated.”

The bench had also banned use of amplifying devices from 10 PM to 6 AM. In response to Ansari’s plea, the Uttar Pradesh government had filed a counter affidavit stating that Azaan was a call to congregate for prayer and hence a violation of lockdown protocol.

Now, the VC also sent copies of her complaint to the Allahabad divisional commissioner, the Inspector General of Police and the senior superintendent of police. The Wire report quoted Prayagraj IG of police Kavindra Pratap Singh who said he will be “writing to all SP’s, telling them that without permission there should not be any public address at religious places.” He added that a meeting will also be held to explain this to the “concerned parties” and said the instructions will be communicated to them and “they will be asked to follow them.”

Meanwhile, the news report stated that Kalimurrahman, caretaker at Masjid-e-Noor also known as Lal Masjid, confirmed that they have already reduced the volume of the speaker by 50 percent, and also changed the direction of the speaker facing her house, and tilted it towards the road. He added, “The issue could have been solved amicably even if she had come to us once,” it was reported that the VC’s house is almost 400 metres away from the mosque.

Meanwhile, it is not yet known if the VC is now satisfied with this solution, but it is not the first time Azaan call has been targeted, especially ahead of Ramzan. In April 2020, two Delhi policemen had unilaterally decided to ban azaan drawing flak for targeting the customs of the Muslim community. The Gujarat government too had banned the use of loudspeakers and public gatherings for religious events. While on the surface, the order seems to apply to religious functions of all communities, the timing of it was curious given how it was issued after the various lunar new year celebrations of other communities, but just before Ramzan began.
https://sabrangindia.in/article/allahabad-univ-vc-can-sleep-better-mosque-reduces-azaan-volume

very good gesture from muslim brothers ,they reduced volume of loud speakers .
Over the years I learned that the unbridled hatred of Muslims was the defining factor of Hindus. You two statements above exemplify this. You do not care about temples or religious worship, but get absolutely delighted at the opportunity to deny some perceived benefit to Muslims - to put them in their as place as it is said.

though you are a hindu hater ,
but we are thankful to muslim brothers , they care for the comfort of neighbours .
 
.
Why reduce volume ? It should be completely stopped.

Loudspeakers for azaan are banned not reduced.
 
.
I think temples are a place of worship as you have mentioned.
Although I do not like the idea of stopping anyone from entering a temple. God does not discriminate among people. Only thing is that anyone entering needs to behave well while in the premises.

why muslims should enter mandir ? they eat beef . mandir should not be apavitra by beef eaters .
Why reduce volume ? It should be completely stopped.

Loudspeakers for azaan are banned not reduced.

yes loud speakers should be banned from mandirs and masjids all.
 
.
islam is peaceful religion , it teaches how to practice islam without disturbing your neighbours .


very good gesture from muslim brothers ,they reduced volume of loud speakers .


though you are a hindu hater ,
but we are thankful to muslim brothers , they care for the comfort of neighbours .

The new breed of PDF Indians.

It's how the rules and bans have mutated us.

Lol.

Cheers, Doc
 
.
It is also true that molvis are also taking advantage of loud speakers. They do not care about the neighbors. You need to understand "loud speaker" is not obligatory but the care of neighbor is obligatory in Islam. You don't need to up the volume to the point where Azan can be hear from KM away. Here it is used as a competition between mosques, who is louder. It is unfortunate that VC sahibah had to go to District Magistrate for this. It would have been better Molvi sahib should reduce the volume himself.
 
.
why muslims should enter mandir ? they eat beef . mandir should not be apavitra by beef eaters .
How do you know that no Hindus have eaten beef?
Will the temple become impure only by beef eater? What about chicken eater, mutton eater? Are those not living beings? Why do you discrmininate against other animals?
Either have sympathy for all animals or stop displaying fake sympathy for cows.
Do you not use leather products - belts, shoes etc?
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom