What's new

Algeria's celebration of November first and the uninvited guest

Algerians choose stability and Bouteflika was fraud re-elected . S we have to put up with Bouteflika the time that the good lord has given him to leave...
After his re-election, he slaughtered 11 Algerian soldiers as an offering to the Muslims radicals that supported him and violently crush a peaceful march in kabylia as a gesture to the arabists who stuffed the ballot boxes for him...
10314610_503256953109553_4852831234358404766_n.jpg

Bouteflika celebrate his win
1794742_498754526893129_4963287861483458080_n.jpg


His brother making sure that has not voted for Louisa.
10246755_496359477132634_5696067812962934404_n.jpg
 
these two were replaced..the ministry of culture and the religion, just like they to remind us that we are Muslims..left the government among many other and were replaced by technocrates..
44-790x347.jpg

khalida_677897852.jpg

The old gov picture..
Bouteflika_Signe_la_Loi_de_Finance_2014_231266128.jpg

The new gov picture
gouvernement9_640051638.jpg

The two dish rags
ouyahiabelkhadem_328319292.jpg


Makri deplores the Salafi favoritisme...Between an MB and a salafi , no difference both smells dry blood..
makri_974346923.jpg
 
The dishrag Jendjawid tossed out after use..
belkhadem99_220657845.jpg


Algerian Imams lost their headmaster crow
actualite2[52696].jpg

imam9_777094247.jpg


News : Conference Bejaia Mohamed Shafik Mesbah:
"The political transition? With or without the people ... "


Mohamed Shafik Mesbah, invited by the Association of Journalists and correspondents Bejaia, gave recently at the regional theater of the city, a conference on the theme. "Freedom of the press, the foundation of democracy"
After a keynote presentation on the doctrinal foundations of the democratic system and the related reports of the three powers, legislative, executive and judicial power with the fourth is that the press, the speaker preferred to open the debate with a very dense audience since the room was archi-height. Issues quickly exceeded the narrow theme of both speaker and audience conference agreed that there could be no true democracy without freedom of press and living that Algeria had a long way to go before reaching that ideal stage.
The debate focused essentially on the current political deadlock and solutions that enable a sustainable exit from crisis. About the crisis, the speaker emphasized that the elections of April 17 was not at all an issue.Whatever Mr. Abdelaziz Bouteflika be renewed or not the head of state.The problem lies not only in the data relating to individual public officials.This is the system in its entirety, is involved. It is true, however, that through the authoritarian system in place have been aggravated during the reign of the current head of state. Politics is totally ossified. Trade union activity is marginal, while the development of the associative movement is deliberately compressed.
delegitimized With failing public institutions and governance must fear the worst. The speaker puts it, willingly, tone on prospects rather pessimistic as it considers that insidious process of transfer of public powers is unfolding before our eyes. In total, the president, because of his health, exercises power in common with the presidential circle whose pivot Mr. Said Bouteflika. Mohamed Shafik Mesbah feeds even more fear about the future of the country that believes that the power of money has come to supersede the authority of elected bodies legal. He has not hesitated to use an image to say that some of the "baltaguia" of the economy have now, more power than the Chief of Staff of the ANP and the head of DRS together.
Whereas the Algerian society was deconstructed and the sustainability of the state was concerned, the speaker noted that it was impossible to ignore the disastrous negative balance advancing headlong, as if nothing had happened. To go from a dictatorial system to a democratic system, there are rules and procedures. A discipline called "transitology" is even taught in universities.
many practical experiences of democratic transition are available to inspire us. Certainly, after October 1988, a transition of this nature has been initiated under the government of Mr. Mouloud Hamrouche, but it was a one night. There has no doubt continued Mohamed Shafik Mesbah, a process of democratic transition requires a number of preconditions together. In this regard, the speaker warned against the temptation to believe that the army could alone, initiating and directing this transition.Those days are gone when the army could substitute for popular sovereignty, the only true foundation of democracy. There are nonetheless - and examples abound throughout the world, starting with Portugal and Spain - where the army has been a powerful platform on which were based the political forces of the countries concerned. The drama in Algeria is that the army - in its backbone and substance - remains the backbone of the country. But no forces organized and active. Specifically, responding to a question from the audience on current attempts about the transition that focus the debate, Mohamed Shafik Mesbah has been clear: "The real problem is not to ask whether the phase transition must be conducted with or without Mr. Abdelaziz Bouteflika. The only question of interest is whether it should be conducted with or without the Algerian people. There is not even an example of a successful democratic transition that has not been done by the people. "
the speaker seemed pessimistic about the immediate situation because he has emphasized, "the regime current has neither the intention nor the ability to engage the democratic transition. The real owners of the control levers are destitute of knowledge and even less useful strategic project in the country. " These "new makers" are only interested in preserving power and broadening the scope of predation. "
The speaker had to deal with specific issues about which he provided answers relied on his personal testimony. About the entrenchment of the Tamazight Mohamed Shafik Mesbah considered this legitimate expectation could not be answered if it was worn by officials driven by beliefs, not political calculation. In this regard, he paid tribute to former President Zeroual, the first head of state to have taken head on to claim that he wished ardently to move the debate to finding satisfactory solutions into account the strict observance of national unity.
About the project wanted to implement the late President Mohamed Boudiaf, Mohamed Shafik Mesbah agreed that it was fueled by a strong nationalist conviction. This is not so much a project that might have upset, however, his approach. It is true that its position on the Western Sahara conflict differed compared to that defended the military command. But in the absence of irrefutable evidence, it would be hazardous to the thesis of the assassination ordered.
B. R.

Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika on Monday named the first government of his fourth term, without having succeeded in integrating the opposition as was desired by the Prime Minister Abdelmalek Sellal appointed him on 28 April.

Key ministers remain in place

In this new team of 35 members, including seven women and dominated by technocrats, senior ministers retain their positions.

Ramtane Lamamra, a career diplomat who served as ambassador to Washington in particular, remains in Foreign Affairs. As Tayeb Belaïz the Interior, of Justice Tayeb Louh, Youcef Yousfi for Energy and General Ahmed Salah Gaïd, Defense with the rank of Deputy Minister, as Minister being provided by the Head of State.

Among the starters include the Minister of Culture Khalida Toumi, a former opponent and former muse of Algerian feminists became fierce partisan Bouteflika who opened his doors in 2002 the government.

It is replaced by another woman, Nadia Labidi, filmmaker and teacher at the University of Algiers.

The Finance Minister Karim Djoudi did it either not renewed, informed sources of ensuring that he had asked her out for "health reasons". He was replaced by Mohamed Djellab, former Minister Delegate for the Budget.

Among the newcomers include the Minister of National Education, Nuria Benghebrit, another academic who headed a research center in anthropology.

The youngest minister is also a woman, Aisha Tagabou, 35, appointed to the position of Deputy Minister of Tourism and Handicraft.

According amended in 2008, in particular, raise the latch of the limit of two presidential terms of Constitution, the government is responsible for "implement" the program of the President of the Republic.

The opposition rejects the offer plan

Elected on April 17 despite heavy health problems, Bouteflika is committed politically to reform the Constitution in order to "strengthen the separation of powers, consolidating the independence of the judiciary and assert the rights of opposition ", whose role is minor in the country.

Moreover, opposition parties declined the offer Sellal be part of the government like the oldest of them, the Socialist Forces Front (FFS) of Hocine Ait-historic leader Ahmed.

According to his leadership, the party refused two ministerial posts preferring to devote himself to "building a national consensus" and "preparation of a national conference" with the government and other parties.

The Workers' Party (PT, Trotskyist) also refused to join the government, according to his spokesman Louisa Hanoune.

Political scientist Rashid Tlemçani described as "non-event" the presentation of revised government where "positions sovereignty and key positions are still held by the presidential clan."

"The government has shown its arrogance towards the opposition and social movements," he has commented.

"There is no political significance except that we continue on the same path," the political scientist abounds Rachid Grim, "we take the same and start again."

Artisan national reconciliation implemented after a decade of civil war, Mr. Bouteflika intends to continue this project because "neither democracy nor development, nor any other national ambition can not move forward without internal stability, without a strong national consensus" has he provided during his swearing.

On the economic front, Bouteflika must strive to diversify an economy that remains dependent on oil and gas: oil accounted for 96% of exports and 40% of GDP in the country.

The next five-year public investment program "is dense (and) for the benefit of all sectors and all regions of the country," four times as big as France, assured Mr. Bouteflika has promised to continue to seek the assistance foreign partners.

slide_340292_3498739_free.jpg


With Bouteflika's 4th mandate Algeria maybe closer to the 90's
5758422-8584973.jpg
 
Are the elections free and fair in Algeria?
Yeh they are free to go vote, but what you put in the ballot box is not necessarily what comes out , when its open for tally the votes...We have an arab vote with Kaddafy's result.

Algerians school girls before the 90's
femme1.jpg

Girls now..
Ph_1_Baccc_KH_495050759.jpg

The few that still brave the street and its pothole..
0acomgf4tm8.jpg

090507Feature2Photo-650_429.jpg

img16.jpg
 
Last edited:
The Amazighity in North Africa is she headed for a "missed appointment" with History?
Where is Northern Africa? What is the perspective of Amazigh secular and progressive forces on an area of confrontation between secularism and Islamism and where several international actors involved in one way or another? What is the future of the Amazigh people of this region who are carriers of an ancient civilization tolerant, and all religions have coexisted Judaism to Islam through Christianity? In short, what is the future of humanity generally in this part of the Euro-Mediterranean area threatened by Arabism and Islamism which extend their tentacles, each day a little further in an already torn social fabric ?

These are generally issues that arise with players Amazigh North Africa, as well as international observers in this region whose history has its roots to the dawn of humanity: A region that represents a space of "clash of civilizations" in the world. Today, the shock that occurs is the result of a conflict between the owners of the land, indigenous Amazigh and "carriers" of an imported ideology of the Middle East; these are usually the ones who are manipulated by external actors (Saoudie Saudi and Qatar specifically) who want to eliminate the legitimate existence of the noble Amazigh peoples in their own territories. Faced with this kind of enemy, the conflict takes on an ethnic dimension to defend the legitimate existence of one of the oldest peoples in the world today. Mr. Hamid (former member of the Berber Academy), published by Edisud, these people are the oldest of the African continent and whose Amazigh Man has its origins in two essential elements: the "pre-Mediterranean" and " Homo sapiens ", from 4000 to 8000 & from 8000 to 12,000 BC. JC. The conflict thus takes on an ethnic dimension to those who defend the false discourse of Arab origin of Amazigh peoples. In this context we note Imazighen defending their Aboriginal rights are based on the international principles of human rights recognized by the international community. Mr Shafiq said "Our right to exist as an ethnic and Aboriginal culture, in addition, be entered in the register of natural rights, the rights of man. So the universal consciousness that we should call and hence to international bodies. " That is to say Imazighen fight on several levels, including ethnicity. Imazighen Thus fight more than one enemy. It is on the one hand, the Arab-Muslim regimes Orthodox playing on the duality of authenticity and modernity, and on the discourse and practice. On the other hand, there is the pan-Arab movements of political Islam which ultimately aids murderous regimes. The recent events in Algeria Ghardaia clearly show the role and objectives of this type of movement. This double confrontation requires a lot of energy and concentration for Amazigh activists who fight for true democracy and secularism.Activists, who have the same aspirations of the West, appropriate western languages and use them to be heard. They overthrew tyrants and establish the novelty in this important part of the southern Mediterranean ... This is the Amazigh uprising that begins to destroy the walls of the backward ideology that separates the north and south of the Mediterranean. Mr. Gilles Kepel said in summary "Arabists in the trash and Orientalists retired".
 
Kerry and Lamamra exchange plaisanteries..

lamamrakery9_782638319.jpg


The most influent Africans..
2781big.jpg
 
Last edited:
Two young men of the Barak movement given a year jail time.... After he thanked Kabylia by crushing a peaceful march, rewarded the islamist radical by slaughtering 11 soldiers, amending the constitution that was amended so much during his tenure that it looks like a Mexican refried bean...``that's our shorty at work..!

barakat_796430207.jpg


48-790x347.jpg

Policeman: Eh Chakib, don't worry the jail is at full capacity..


What to look for during this mandate...
Constitution amendments, and vehicle's inspection
20140512.jpg
 
Last edited:
Not really...You don't even know the weight of Algeria in the Kingdom and in the most influent states of the GCC. In that case, tell me why neither Jordan or Morocco has gain membership with the GCC after they were both invited?

All the Moslem refuse to state their positions on that issue including the Algerian islamic party. The important thing that those territories have nver been recognized as Moroccan by the international court of the Hague and by the United Nation. The only countries that favor the notion, is France and Spain for their respective interest. Morocco expansionist policies are not new and Algerian will never tolerate, accomodate with a North African ISRAEL.


Thank you.
I would like to respond to your statement about Morocco's expantionist policies and say that it is rather a gratuitous statement; If it was true, then Tinduf would be in the equation instead of it being handed to Algeria by Morocco much before the Sahara question.
Also do not forget that the Moroccans fought on both fronts during the french occupation of Algeria and Morocco, I am talking about Adelkerrim Al khatabi, you can find the facts in any north African history book, that was much more than a sign of fraternity, it went till death for the algerian independance. This guy fought 3 Armies, 2 mighty French one in Morocco and Algeria, and one Spanish in the North of morocco.
Also I would like to point out that this all-of-a-sudden created entitiy, called the polisario, should claim the whole desert from Morocco to Yemen if it can claim that portion of it and be supported by people who covertly or overtly want to divide and reign in North Africa, from elswhere.
If it was not from Morocco to liberate its Sahara desert from Spain, this so called Polisario (brothers a bit manipulated by many) would have never surfaced and, I will as I should ask you this question: Why Algeria did not go to war against Spain when it was occuping the Sahara, in support of the Polisario, whom, based on your assamptions, was already fighting there, with no proof to be found ?
I also find no logic to your other statement of accomodating a North African Israel, one just can not compare the two or else one can accuse Algeria and it internal civil war to what was going on in Gaza and the occupide territories, which will obviously be out of context and illogical.
Regards.
 
I would like to respond to your statement about Morocco's expantionist policies and say that it is rather a gratuitous statement; If it was true, then Tinduf would be in the equation instead of it being handed to Algeria by Morocco much before the Sahara question.
Also do not forget that the Moroccans fought on both fronts during the french occupation of Algeria and Morocco, I am talking about Adelkerrim Al khatabi, you can find the facts in any north African history book, that was much more than a sign of fraternity, it went till death for the algerian independance. This guy fought 3 Armies, 2 mighty French one in Morocco and Algeria, and one Spanish in the North of morocco.
Also I would like to point out that this all-of-a-sudden created entitiy, called the polisario, should claim the whole desert from Morocco to Yemen if it can claim that portion of it and be supported by people who covertly or overtly want to divide and reign in North Africa, from elswhere.
If it was not from Morocco to liberate its Sahara desert from Spain, this so called Polisario (brothers a bit manipulated by many) would have never surfaced and, I will as I should ask you this question: Why Algeria did not go to war against Spain when it was occuping the Sahara, in support of the Polisario, whom, based on your assamptions, was already fighting there, with no proof to be found ?
I also find no logic to your other statement of accomodating a North African Israel, one just can not compare the two or else one can accuse Algeria and it internal civil war to what was going on in Gaza and the occupide territories, which will obviously be out of context and illogical.
Regards.
SC, I love to debate with you in any subject that may concerns Algeria, Morocco and the Sahara. You need to be objective and not base your opinions on what Morocco and her lobbyist are putting out there...Everything I have posted on the subject come from reliable sources..
 
SC, I love to debate with you in any subject that may concerns Algeria, Morocco and the Sahara. You need to be objective and not base your opinions on what Morocco and her lobbyist are putting out there...Everything I have posted on the subject come from reliable sources..
So, it must be a difference in sources and material, with too many interests involved. That takes nothing from my objectivity or yours as a matter of fact, since it depends on the sources I and you rely upon.
You know, a while ago, I had noticed an astonishing fact while taking a pause from some hard engineering studies; I was looking at a wall World Map in my home and found out how the whole Arab world was divided between West and East, it was one country by one: Morocco pro-western, Algeria pro-Eastern...and so on till the other side of the middle east.
This fact alone should tell you why these differences of opinions and perceptions exist, while their is another genuine opinion of the Arabs from their own history books that is being ignored somehow.
 
So, it must be a difference in sources and material, with too many interests involved. That takes nothing from my objectivity or yours as a matter of fact, since it depends on the sources I and you rely upon.
You know, a while ago, I had noticed an astonishing fact while taking a pause from some hard engineering studies; I was looking at a wall World Map in my home and found out how the whole Arab world was divided between West and East, it was one country by one: Morocco pro-western, Algeria pro-Eastern...and so on till the other side of the middle east.
This fact alone should tell you why these differences of opinions and perceptions exist, while their is another genuine opinion of the Arabs from their own history books that is being ignored somehow.
That may be true for the rest of the Arab world. There is one particular thing that does exist among north African , is they like each other regardless how at odds their respective governments get a time. And that what makes North Africa difference! For example, Moroccan Algerian border is closed, that didn't stop the [legal]commerce that flows between the two countries is higher than between Egypt and Algeria for example...
 
That may be true for the rest of the Arab world. There is one particular thing that does exist among north African , is they like each other regardless how at odds their respective governments get a time. And that what makes North Africa difference! For example, Moroccan Algerian border is closed, that didn't stop the [legal]commerce that flows between the two countries is higher than between Egypt and Algeria for example...
True, and I would like to see that going between all Arab nations from Morocco to the far east, believe it or not their populations share the same thoughts and commonalities when it comes to their macro affairs.
I do not know if you know that even the Berbers of North Africa came from Yemen the cradle of the Arabs, you can Google a Yemeni place called AMAZIGHT.
 
True, and I would like to see that going between all Arab nations from Morocco to the far east, believe it or not their populations share the same thoughts and commonalities when it comes to their macro affairs.
I do not know if you know that even the Berbers of North Africa came from Yemen the cradle of the Arabs, you can Google a Yemeni place called AMAZIGHT.

I don't think I will see it in our lifetime, the cultural divide is so wide and deep. For the origin of the North African berber, I have read something to that effect, but I think the North African are of mesopotamian origin..
 
Back
Top Bottom