What's new

Al-Aqsa: Palestinians killed as Jerusalem protests rage

That's not a legal justification, rather emotional and personal. So stop wasting bandwidth on this site.
According to international law Judea and Samaria do not belong to any sovereign state, and therefore the entity controlling the territory (Israel) can build and settle in this territory
 
.
Just another attempt by Muslims to create chaos and destruction in OURS and THEIRS holy place.
Call for day of rage cause of METAL Dectectors .
hilarious

These aren't any 'Muslims', they are Palestinians opposing increased measures in the West Bank and city of Jerusalem that strangle them even more and usurp more of their land by the day. You were reported for anti-Muslim post, by the way.

According to international law Judea and Samaria do not belong to any sovereign state, and therefore the entity controlling the territory (Israel) can build and settle in this territory

Go ahead and provide sources for this claim. Should be very quick since you're adamant about it. :D

We're still waiting. :D
 
Last edited:
.
. . .
You have to read everything

Source? :lol:

So you cite a pdf file you never read than claim we have to read everything to avoid referencing us to the exact page or section that supports your argument. If you are adamant we have to read everything than surely you have read it all yourself and can direct us to the section supporting your argument. But, of course, you haven't and the onus is on you. Until then, no one here is going to read through 73 pages especially when suggested by a notorious liar who proposes emotional and personal cases as opposed to legal ones ....
 
. . . .
Source? :lol:

So you cite a pdf file you never read than claim we have to read everything to avoid referencing us to the exact page or section that supports your argument. If you are adamant we have to read everything than surely you have read it all yourself and can direct us to the section supporting your argument. But, of course, you haven't and the onus is on you. Until then, no one here is going to read through 73 pages especially when suggested by a notorious liar who proposes emotional and personal cases as opposed to legal ones ....
You want a source, you got it, read it
I read the report in Hebrew many years ago

Want my summary?
No country has sovereignty over Judea and Samaria
Israel is the controlling party (which did not contain sovereignty) over Judea and Samaria
There is no law preventing the Israeli government from building in this area (under certain conditions)
 
.
That's not a legal justification, rather emotional and personal. So stop wasting bandwidth on this site.



I was there last year and noticed no such thing, there was complete freedom of movement. People of all ages could enter and there was no delay. So if there were any they were very well implemented and not noticed. The demonstrations in Palestine are not primarily related to these explosive detectors, rather the status quo in Jerusalem and the West Bank overall.

Your own link:

But there are no other measures in place to screen pilgrims for weapons, explosive devices or other banned items, although there are more than 700 cameras tracking them for possible theft, pickpocketing and other criminal or immoral activity.

......
......

You need to read before you post things in a rush ....

Of course I read the whole thing before I posted.
Still gives a background to the issue of metal detectors.
 
. .
Oh really. If i speak the truth then I am a troll. Palestinians have no right to get into Israel.

Are you mad bro? :lol:

Yes you are trolling, this a thread to discuss current events. You can give your rational input and if you decide to make a case, do so with sources and in a mature demeanor. Instead you whine about 'lying' which you would be able to refute with sources if anyone is lying. Then demand Palestinians should leave Palestine and that is the 'truth' or whatever. That's flaming/trolling.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom