What's new

AI could ‘kill many humans’ within two years, warns Sunak adviser

khansaheeb

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
17,009
Reaction score
-8
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom

AI could ‘kill many humans’ within two years, warns Sunak adviser​

Story by Adam Forrest and Kate Devlin • Yesterday 17:06


There are very broad range of predictions among AI experts



BBERMX9.img
The Independent
AI could ‘kill many humans’ within two years, says Sunak adviser
Unmute
0

View on Watch
More videos
Artificial intelligence (AI) could create a “dystopia” a government minister has warned after Rishi Sunak’s adviser on the technology said it could become powerful enough to “kill many humans” in only two years’ time.
Matt Clifford said even short-term risks were “pretty scary”, with AI having the potential to create cyber and biological weapons that could inflict many deaths.It comes as Mr Sunak heads to the US, where he is set to try to persuade president Joe Biden of his “grand plan” for the UK to be at the centre of international AI regulation.
Britons Leave NHS: From £28/Month PMI Provides A Much Faster Service


Britons Leave NHS: From £28/Month PMI Provides A Much Faster Service

Ad
Protection Plans

The PM wants Britain to host a watchdog for AI similar to the International Atomic Energy Agency, and will also propose a new international research body.
Paul Scully, minster for tech and digital economy, told the TechUK Tech Policy Leadership Conference on Tuesday that there should not solely be a focus on a “Terminator-style scenario”.
He said: “If we get it wrong, there is a dystopian point of view that we can follow here. There’s also a utopian point of view. Both can be possible.
“If you’re only talking about the end of humanity because of some, rogue, Terminator-style scenario, you’re going to miss out on all of the good that AI is already functioning - how it’s mapping proteins to help us with medical research, how it’s helping us with climate change.
“All of those things it’s already doing and will only get better at doing.
“We have to take breathing space to make sure we’re getting this right for the whole of society, as well as the benefit of the sector.”Mr Clifford said that that unless AI producers are regulated on a global scale then there could be “very powerful” systems that humans could struggle to control.
Mr Clifford’s intervention come after a letter backed by dozens of top experts – including many of the pioneers of AI – warned that the risks of the technology should be treated with the same urgency as pandemics or nuclear war.
Senior bosses at Google DeepMind and Anthropic signed the letter along with the so-called “godfather of AI”, Geoffrey Hinton. Mr Hinton resigned from his job at Google earlier this month – warning that in the wrong hands, AI could spell the end of humanity.
Mr Clifford is advising Mr Sunak on the development of a government taskforce which is looking into AI language models such as ChatGPT and Google Bard, and is also chairman of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (Aria).
He told TalkTV: “The near-term risks are actually pretty scary. You can use AI today to create new recipes for bio weapons or to launch large-scale cyber attacks. These are bad things.”
The No 10 adviser added: “The kind of existential risk that I think the letter writers were talking about is ... about what happens once we effectively create a new species, an intelligence that is greater than humans.”

Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak are set to discuss AI in Washington (PA Wire)
Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak are set to discuss AI in Washington (PA Wire)© Provided by The Independent
While conceding that a two-year timescale for computers to surpass human intelligence was at the “bullish end of the spectrum”, Mr Clifford said AI systems were becoming “more and more capable at an ever increasing rate”.
Asked what percentage chance he would give that humanity could be wiped out by AI, Mr Clifford said: “I think it is not zero.”
He continued: “If we go back to things like the bio weapons or cyber [attacks], you can have really very dangerous threats to humans that could kill many humans – not all humans – simply from where we would expect models to be in two years’ time.
“I think the thing to focus on now is how do we make sure that we know how to control these models because right now we don’t.”
AI apps have gone viral online, with users posting fake images of celebrities and politicians, and students using ChatGPT and other “language learning models” to generate university-grade essays.
But AI can also perform life-saving tasks, such as algorithms analysing medical images such as X-rays, scans and ultrasounds, helping doctors to identify and diagnose diseases such as cancer and heart conditions more accurately and quickly.

No 10 adviser has warned AI poses ‘existential risk’ (PA Archive)
No 10 adviser has warned AI poses ‘existential risk’ (PA Archive)© Provided by The Independent
Mr Clifford said that AI, if harnessed in the right way, could be a force for good. “You can imagine AI curing diseases, making the economy more productive, helping us get to a carbon neutral economy,” he said.
As well as a new global regulator based in London, Mr Sunak is keen for the UK to host an international AI summit this autumn, according to Politico.
The prime minister will also suggest to Mr Biden that a new international research body, similar to the CERN institute that exists for particle physics, is set up for AI.
The PM’s official spokesman said he did not want to “pre-empt” Mr Sunak’s conversation with Mr Biden – but said that the UK could become a global leader on both the new technology and regulatory systems for AI.
“We are not complacent about the potential risks of AI. Equally, it does present significant opportunities for the people of the UK. The UK is looking to lead the way in this space,” said the No 10 spokesman, adding: “You cannot look to proceed with AI without having the right guardrails in place.”
Former Tory leader William Hague said it was in both countries interests to co-operate on stronger oversight. “If the US and UK could work together on such regulation while remaining more agile than contrasting approaches in the EU and China, they could create a transatlantic model of good governance,” he wrote in The Times.
Labour is pushing for ministers to bar technology developers from working on advanaced AI tools unless they have been granted a licence.
Shadow culture secretary Lucy Powell, who is due to speak at TechUK’s conference on AI on Tuesday, told The Guardian that AI should be licensed in a similar way to medicines or nuclear power. “That is the kind of model we should be thinking about,” she said.
From news to politics, travel to sport, culture to climate – The Independent has a host of free newsletters to suit your interests. To find the stories you want to read, and more, in your inbox, click here.






Sponsored Content
Britons Leave NHS: From £28/Month PMI Provides A Much Faster Service
 

Attachments

  • 1686143274182.png
    1686143274182.png
    68 bytes · Views: 28
AI research in the USA focuses on human-computer interaction. The most severely affected will be Call Centre and BPO.

AI research in China focuses on industrial applications. It will solve our population problem.
 
AI research in the USA focuses on human-computer interaction. The most severely affected will be Call Centre and BPO.

AI research in China focuses on industrial applications. It will solve our population problem.
Weaponisation of AI certainly sends a chill down the mind/spine.
 
Weaponisation of AI certainly sends a chill down the mind/spine.
In China, many AI experts are already calling for an international convention to limit the weaponization of AI. I think we will soon see such a convention emerge.

If it does not appear, then the extinction of humanity is just around the corner.
 
People are getting scared of AI and rightly so, the war between humans and Technology is beginning:-


Cody Colvin
Cody ColvinCody Colvin• 3rd+• 3rd+Media production, strategy & real estate - founder @ COLVIN THEATRICALMedia production, strategy & real estate - founder @ COLVIN THEATRICAL
17h • Edited • 17h • Edited •

Follow

Effective immediately, television, film and major commercial production will halt. This is a big deal for everyone in the industry and puts a lot of folks out of work. Hoping for speedy negotiations. My takeaways from the outside:

Since streamers only make money on subscriptions (and some on ad revenue and video on demand, but less so), it's virtually impossible to track which films & shows played roles in earning subscribers, and by how much.

Realistically, the only way to compare one property against another is to count views and watch time. Even then, from the studio perspective, views and time are difficult to correlate to revenue with any real accuracy.

On the other hand, streaming networks earn a LOT of revenue. And, realistically, that revenue is driven by top-heavy shows that are pulling in and retaining subscribers en masse. So, SAG and the WGA have a real claim to some of that revenue.

The problem is that the studios will want something quantifiable, but might rely on SAG to come up with what that might be. And, probably vice versa, too.

With the strike -

as well as profit growth declining for many of these streaming services

along with strong competition amongst the services themselves that might slow inter-service collaboration

and a likely stalemate over residuals for previously-produced content...

what will end up happening?

Hollywood Actors Strike: TV and Movie Actors Vote for Biggest Walkout in Four Decades​

nytimes.com • 32 min read

  • like
    celebrate
    insightful
    34
  • 10 comments
  • 2 reposts

Like
Comment

Repost
Selma S.Selma S.• 3rd+• 3rd+Executive Producer & Creative DirectorExecutive Producer & Creative Director
17h • Edited • 17h • Edited •

Follow

The guilds need support to come to an agreement with the studios. I've seen many friends and colleagues in the film industry having a very difficult time since 2020 with the lack of steady work and fair wages. If we all agree that we love a well-written, directed, acted, and produced story, and we do, let's agree on fair contracts for the creators

Hollywood Actors Strike: TV and Movie Actors Vote for Biggest Walkout in Four Decades​

nytimes.com • 32 min read
 
In China, many AI experts are already calling for an international convention to limit the weaponization of AI. I think we will soon see such a convention emerge.

If it does not appear, then the extinction of humanity is just around the corner.

It will be hard to stop the military from implementing some computer vision AI on the tip of a missile that basically will laugh at the chaff and flares defending aircraft will attempt to use to disrupt it.
 
It will be hard to stop the military from implementing some computer vision AI on the tip of a missile that basically will laugh at the chaff and flares defending aircraft will attempt to use to disrupt it.
wonder if its not safer to use VI for that instead of AI, a VI only imitate human behavior's and don't pass that stage but when it come to AI the sky is the limit
 
wonder if its not safer to use VI for that instead of AI, a VI only imitate human behavior's and don't pass that stage but when it come to AI the sky is the limit

The AI will not only laugh at the chaff and flares but decide on the fly the best place to hit the aircraft at the given angle. Maybe instead of the hot engine it will be like the russian missiles and target the cockpit.
 
Thank god, we might have pretty Indian women (even though virtual) presenting news now:-

 
AI is extremely beneficial but also extremely dangerous technology. Even Elon Musk is spooked.
 
All these '80s and '90s movies warning us about the danger of AI and look at those greedy buffoons today! So eager to keep developing AI for everything!
 
ChatGPT now is a plain text thing.

I think the next step will be a ChatGPT with OCR and CV connected to a VNC of a computer/smartphone/tablet and using it as a human would do
 

Back
Top Bottom