What's new

Ahead of 1971 war, Nixon branded his envoy to India as traitor

ExtraOdinary

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
3,354
Reaction score
-6
Country
India
Location
India
WASHINGTON: Reluctant to hear anything against then Pakistan president Gen Yahya Khan and his army ahead of the 1971 war, the then US President Richard Nixon branded his own envoy to India as a "traitor" and an "Indian mouthpiece", says a new book based on declassified documents.

In fact, Nixon wanted to fire Kenneth B Keating, the then US ambassador to India, because he refused to tow his line and instead had the courage and strength to speak the truth to the President that his closest ally Pakistan was indulging in a genocide, says the book 'The Blood Telegram: Nixon, Kissinger, and a Forgotten Genocide'.

The book is authored by Gary Bass, who is a professor of politics and international affairs at Princeton University.

"Nixon said, 'Keating's a traitor' and told (the then secretary of state Henry) Kissinger that they should fire the ambassador. The Indians, Nixon said, were 'Awful but they are getting some assistance from Keating, of course.'

"Kissinger agreed: 'A lot of assistance; he is practically their mouthpiece'," says the book.

"He (Nixon) added, 'He has gone native. As I told you, I saw the Indians and listened to their complaints and Keating kept interrupting and saying but you forgot to mention this or that'. (This was false: in the meetings in Delhi, Keating only spoke once, to break an awkward silence in the conversation with Indira Gandhi)," the book said.

"Nixon said, 'I think we ought to get moving on him; he is 71 years old'. 'Yes', replied Kissinger, 'but he would do us a lot of damage now' — the inevitable congressional outrage if their old colleague was pushed out. 'We should wait until things quiet down'. Nixon said, 'Two or 3 months and then I think we ought to do it'," according to the book.

In another meeting at the Oval Office, Nixon wondered why every Ambassador who goes to India falls in love with it.

"Highlighting US donations for the refugees, he for once mentioned 'human suffering', and said that they must 'go all out — all out — on the relief side'. But then he said, 'Now let me be very blunt', and ripped into Kenneth Keating: 'Every Ambassador who goes to India falls in love with India'," the book quotes Nixon as saying.

According to the author, this direct presidential attack was so far out of bounds that Kissinger and Saunders censored it out of their official record of the conversation for the State Department.

"Nixon told the senior state department officials that they 'have to cool off the pro-Indians in the state department and out in South Asia'. He added that fewer Americans swooned for Pakistan, 'because the Pakistanis are a different breed. The Pakistanis are straightforward — and sometimes extremely stupid. The Indians are more devious, sometimes so smart that we fall for their line'," the book said.

Ahead of 1971 war, Nixon branded his envoy to India as traitor - The Times of India
 
. .
US always use other country for their use. Because of cold war they support pakistan. Now they are using them for their war...
 
.
Every Ambassador who goes to India falls in love with India
:cool:

He added that fewer Americans swooned for Pakistan, 'because the Pakistanis are a different breed. The Pakistanis are straightforward — and sometimes extremely stupid.
:omghaha: :lol:

The Indians are more devious, sometimes so smart that we fall for their line'," the book said.
:cheers:
 
.
it seems the relation between US and Pakistan those days was like higher than the mountain and deeper than ocean and sweeter than honey....what went wrong then ????
 
. .
To all the Pakistanis,

see how unconditional support you got from US. And you still curse them.

P.S.
Still you did not win in 1971.

Yes dude and they were even planning a naval invasion of India with UK but Russia intervened against them. Furthermore, the war was over too quickly for them to do anything more and international opinion was too pro-India, pro-Bangladesh and anti-Pakistan for them to ignore.

And now they are bombing Pak with drones.

PS: We would have won the war anyway. :yay:
 
. .
it seems the relation between US and Pakistan those days was like higher than the mountain and deeper than ocean and sweeter than honey....what went wrong then ????

It just rose so high that it disappeared like a "gas" and then it went so low that it went deeper than $hit....
The story was simple; that "Chacha Sam" was just using "Bhatija Pak" and "Bhatija Pak" was all the while hoping to use "Chacha Sam".
Both were fooling around with each other while enacting this "Chacha-Bhatija" story for so long.
 
.
It just rose so high that it disappeared like a "gas" and then it went so low that it went deeper than $hit....
The story was simple; that "Chacha Sam" was just using "Bhatija Pak" and "Bhatija Pak" was all the while hoping to use "Chacha Sam".
Both were fooling around with each other while enacting this "Chacha-Bhatija" story for so long.

are u saying US farted out pak?
~
 
.
WASHINGTON: Reluctant to hear anything against then Pakistan president Gen Yahya Khan and his army ahead of the 1971 war, the then US President Richard Nixon branded his own envoy to India as a "traitor" and an "Indian mouthpiece", says a new book based on declassified documents.

In fact, Nixon wanted to fire Kenneth B Keating, the then US ambassador to India, because he refused to tow his line and instead had the courage and strength to speak the truth to the President that his closest ally Pakistan was indulging in a genocide, says the book 'The Blood Telegram: Nixon, Kissinger, and a Forgotten Genocide'.

The book is authored by Gary Bass, who is a professor of politics and international affairs at Princeton University.

"Nixon said, 'Keating's a traitor' and told (the then secretary of state Henry) Kissinger that they should fire the ambassador. The Indians, Nixon said, were 'Awful but they are getting some assistance from Keating, of course.'

"Kissinger agreed: 'A lot of assistance; he is practically their mouthpiece'," says the book.

"He (Nixon) added, 'He has gone native. As I told you, I saw the Indians and listened to their complaints and Keating kept interrupting and saying but you forgot to mention this or that'. (This was false: in the meetings in Delhi, Keating only spoke once, to break an awkward silence in the conversation with Indira Gandhi)," the book said.

"Nixon said, 'I think we ought to get moving on him; he is 71 years old'. 'Yes', replied Kissinger, 'but he would do us a lot of damage now' — the inevitable congressional outrage if their old colleague was pushed out. 'We should wait until things quiet down'. Nixon said, 'Two or 3 months and then I think we ought to do it'," according to the book.

In another meeting at the Oval Office, Nixon wondered why every Ambassador who goes to India falls in love with it.

"Highlighting US donations for the refugees, he for once mentioned 'human suffering', and said that they must 'go all out — all out — on the relief side'. But then he said, 'Now let me be very blunt', and ripped into Kenneth Keating: 'Every Ambassador who goes to India falls in love with India'," the book quotes Nixon as saying.

According to the author, this direct presidential attack was so far out of bounds that Kissinger and Saunders censored it out of their official record of the conversation for the State Department.

"Nixon told the senior state department officials that they 'have to cool off the pro-Indians in the state department and out in South Asia'. He added that fewer Americans swooned for Pakistan, 'because the Pakistanis are a different breed. The Pakistanis are straightforward — and sometimes extremely stupid. The Indians are more devious, sometimes so smart that we fall for their line'," the book said.

Ahead of 1971 war, Nixon branded his envoy to India as traitor - The Times of India

Thanks for info
 
. .
actual blood telegram,written by Archer Blood(US Diplomat in Dhaka)....

465px-Blood_telegram.png


Our government has failed to denounce the suppression of democracy. Our government has failed to denounce atrocities. Our government has failed to take forceful measures to protect its citizens while at the same time bending over backwards to placate the West Pak[istan] dominated government and to lessen any deservedly negative international public relations impact against them. Our government has evidenced what many will consider moral bankruptcy,(...) But we have chosen not to intervene, even morally, on the grounds that the Awami conflict, in which unfortunately the overworked term genocide is applicable, is purely an internal matter of a sovereign state. Private Americans have expressed disgust. We, as professional civil servants, express our dissent with current policy and fervently hope that our true and lasting interests here can be defined and our policies redirected.

Archer Blood - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
it seems the relation between US and Pakistan those days was like higher than the mountain and deeper than ocean and sweeter than honey....what went wrong then ????

They still have a good relationship, don't you know that the Pakistan national bird is the USA Drone? :omghaha:
 
.
To all the Pakistanis,

see how unconditional support you got from US. And you still curse them.

P.S.
Still you did not win in 1971.
You peece of sh!t baniya!!! Pakistan iz gr8 cuntry we fck dark skin Indian pricks. We win all war!!! We 1 1971 war becuz ISI planed Bangladesh to confuze poor slum dog Indian. We 1 Kargil war becuz we av the highest peek there!!! Even thoh we can nt control all ov Kargil we still won. U Dark skin baniya rapist.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom