^^ as long as it's DRDO, i know it will be a joke, largely en elementary paintjob purchased from Russia.
An easy and partial proof: will someone pulls out DRDO's financial statements, if it has one, to check those tiny footnotes on how much "expenditures", or "goodwill spending" if it's more sophitiscated, paid to Russia before every Agni launch?
MIRV technology-wise, India is about 40 years hehind China. Agni-VI to what China has long posessed is like what Mig-16 to F-35. That's the gap, people. Stop day-dreaming.
MIRV requires miniature tech that India won't have for the nxst 30 years at least if without Russia's help which I doubt. Moskow is not dumb enough to sell reliable high tech delivery systems to india.
Agni's guidance system- a key in missle delivery, will ALWAYS be purchased from Russia - why? because India has neither tech knowhow nor high tech industrial might to produce it.
Many turn-key tech also, such as materials used.
And don't get me started on reliablity issue, which is the soul of any delivery. Launch 1 is easy, how about launch 10 in a roll without hitting Mumbai "accidentally"?
Surely you don't want it to land on Mumbai the second tme you try to launch it right? For Indians (comparablely, just check your miserable satelite launch failure rate - world-leading on myth and randomness
, to put it mildly), it might be the case
In a nutshell, its not whether you can deliver ir or not, it's how reliable it is, get it?
it's like most countries can nowadays really make a bullet or a rifle, as long as having some industries. Yet only a handful of countries can make a reliable bullet and rifle that almost never fail - definition: workable, meaning extremely high reliability. India is far from being a member of this "elite club".
Want to know why? You don't have proper industry to design and produce that or anyting related. Whatever DODO's fancy ideas and promises are, they will stay on paper indefinitely, or proceed in typical DRDO-style: (fill in the blank) Mark I, fail, MARK II, no more news after.., so what? then "far more advanced" Mark III, fail, no prob, now let's talk about "futuristic" Mark IV...
Can't you see and do you have a proper brain to comprehend at this level?
...that whatever your DRDO does, like basic idea and design generating, is very very simple stuff - stuff that most graduate students from most decent universities around the world can more or less do. It's nothing! - THE HARD PART, though, is how to realise it, how to make it happen. That seperates a bragging bigot or a troll that your DRDO, or HAL or ISRO, is, to a real industrial power lab. Therefore the more news conferences (aka Bragging Championship) it holds, stupider it looks giving no PhD stud holds a press conf on what his term project idea.