What's new

After Rash of Islamist Killings, Bangladesh High Court Considers Eliminating Islam as State Religion

Homo Sapiens

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,641
Reaction score
-1
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
After Rash of Islamist Killings, Bangladesh High Court Considers Eliminating Islam as State Religion

After Rash of Islamist Killings, Bangladesh High Court Considers Eliminating Islam as State Religion
163
0
protest-against-murders-of-secular-writers-bloggers-publishers-in-bangladesh-AP-640x480.jpg

AP Photo/ A.M. Ahad

by Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D.1 Mar 201693

After a recent spate of killings of members of religious minorities by Islamic extremists, the supreme court of Bangladesh has begun hearing arguments challenging Islam’s privileged status as official state religion, a measure applauded by religious liberty activists and minority leaders.
In 1988, Bangladesh’s military government amended the country’s constitution to declare Islam as the official state religion. That very same year, a group of 15 prominent writers, former judges, educators and cultural activists filed a petition contesting the legitimacy of the move, but the courts did not act to review the petition until now.

In recent months Bangladesh has experienced a “surge in killings” of members of Hindu, Christian and Shi’ite religious minorities, which authorities have said are the work of Islamic extremist groups.

Despite warnings from U.S. intelligence that the Islamic State is stepping up recruitment activity in the South Asian country, the Bangladeshi government has insisted that its Islamist problems are home grown.

“We have made arrests on each and every so-called ISIS-claimed attack,” said one Bangladesh police official. “The attackers have confessed their crimes in court. They have also confessed being a Jamaatul Mujahedin Bangladesh member, and denied any linkage with ISIS,” he said.

On February 29, Bangladesh’s Supreme Court officially began hearing arguments on the petition disputing the constitutionality of the adoption of Islam as the state religion.

Bangladesh’s original constitution, adopted soon after the nation split from Pakistan in 1971, declared the country to be a secular state.

It was the military ruler H. M. Ershard who decreed Islam to be the state religion in 1988, inserting an eighth amendment to the constitution to that effect. The legality of that move is what is now being disputed.

Religious minority leaders have commended the high court’s move to reexamine the state religion issue.

Bishop Bejoy N. D’Cruze of Sylhet, chairman of the Catholic bishops’ Christian Unity and Interreligious Dialogue Commission, said that the decision to review the petition inspires great hope for religious minorities.

“When a state officially accepts a state religion, then it puts barricades for communal harmony because it recognizes supremacy of a particular religion and makes other religions inferior,” D’Cruze said, adding that recent extremist attacks on religious minorities are an indirect consequence of the adoption of a state religion.

“We hope and demand that every religion in Bangladesh are put on an equal footing in terms of status and respect,” he said.

Another religious leader, Govinda Chadra Pramanik, secretary of Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance, said that by sponsoring Islam as the official religion, the state has created grounds for the persecution of minorities, especially Hindus.

“The state religion established the supremacy of Islam over other religions, offering a weapon to radical Islamists to abuse minority communities. Moreover, Islam gets more attention from the state, not other religions, which is an obstacle to interfaith harmony,” he said.

“As the state religion, Islam put psychological pressure on minorities, and makes them vulnerable to abuse and exploitation. The court must come to the right decision and withdraw it,” he added.

Muslims make up some 90 percent of Bangladesh’s population, while Hindus account for 8 percent and other religions—including Buddhism and Christianity—make up the rest.
 
. . .
So reducing an Islamic country to a secular country is a way to go?

Strange enough, that Bangladesh was created on the basis of linguistic nationalism. So linguistic nationalism and secularism holds higher values than being a Muslim. This is really way to go!
 
.
Larger High Court bench to hear rule on Islam as state religion of Bangladesh Monday
Senior Correspondent bdnews24.com

Published: 2016-02-29 02:17:32.0 BdST Updated: 2016-02-29 02:17:32.0 BdST


  • HC.jpg


Previous Next
A larger bench of the High Court will hear on Monday final arguments on a previous rule that questioned the insertion of Islam as state religion in the Constitution.



A two-member bench of the court had issued the rule in December 2011.

Justice AHM Shamsuddin Choudhury and Justice Gobinda Chandra Tagore had also asked why the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution, that made Islam the state religion of Bangladesh, should not be annulled.

The amendment made in June 1988 during the tenure of military strongman HM Ershad inserted Article 2A in the Constitution which gave Islam the status of state religion.

Fifteen eminent persons filed a writ petition the same year challenging the change in the Constitution.

They are former Supreme Court judge Justice Kamal Uddin Hossain, National Professor Kabir Chowdhury, Prof Khan Sarwar Murshid, Prof Mosharraf Hossain, retired Maj Gen CR Duttta, Prof Serajul Islam Choudhury, writer Badaruddin Umar, journalist and writer Faiz Ahmed, Borhan Uddin Khan Jahangir and Prof Anisuzzaman.

Of them, only Duttta, Umar, Jahangir, Serajul Islam and Anisuzzaman are alive.

According to the cause list of the High Court, the three-member bench headed by Justice Naima Haider will hear the petition after 2pm.

The two other members of the bench are Justice Quazi Reza-Ul Hoque and Justice MD Ashraful Kamal.

The petitioners’ lawyer Zoglul Haider Afrik told bdnews24.com the chief justice formed the larger bench following their petition filed on Sep 6 last year.

The previous bench that issued the rule had also appointed nine lawyers as amici curiae, or friends of the court, for advice.

They are TH Khan, Kamal Hossain, Rafique-Ul Haque, Amir-ul-Islam, Rokanuddin Mahmud, Yusuf Hossain Humayun, M Zahir, Mahmudul Islam, Fida M Kamal, ASM Mesbahuddin and Abdul Matin Khasru.

Larger High Court bench to hear rule on Islam as state religion of Bangladesh Monday -
bdnews24.com
 
.
Al-Baqara 256

Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things.

And the words of Imam Jafar as-Sadiq

“If you find see something you don’t like in a brother, try to find 1-70 excuses for him. And if you can’t find an excuse, say ‘There might be an excuse, but I don’t know it.’ “

If a man addresses his brother as, ‘O’ Disbeliever’ (Kaafir) it returns to one of them; either it is as he said or it returns to him.” Sahih Bukhari 10/427 and Sahih Muslim 60, Narrated by Ibn Umar


 
.
Top Bangladesh court reviews Islam as state religion
Religious minorities urge return to secular, less divisive charter
1456823724.JPG

Students and teachers rally during an Interfaith Harmony Week in Dhaka on Feb. 1, 2016. Bangladeshi activists say Islam’s status as the state religion in constitution breeds communalism and hinders interfaith harmony. (Photo by Stephan Uttom)

ucanews.com reporters, Dhaka, Bangladesh
March 1, 2016

Tweet

print.jpg

mail.jpg



Bangladesh’s Supreme Court on Feb. 29 began hearing arguments on a writ petition challenging the insertion of Islam as the state religion in the country’s constitution, in a move lauded by minority leaders including a Catholic bishop.

A three-judge bench is presently reviewing the petition to see if Islam as the state religion is in conflict with the country's constitution. The petition was originally filed by 15 prominent writers, former judges, educationists and cultural activists in 1988.

"Even if it is delayed, the court has decided to start the hearing because it's a petition on a constitutional issue," attorney general Mahbubey Alam told reporters in Dhaka on Feb. 29.

They challenged the-then military government’s decision that same year to make Islam the state religion of Muslim-majority Bangladesh.

Drafted in 1972, soon after Bangladesh's split from Pakistan in 1971, the original constitution declared the country a secular state.

However, military ruler Ziaur Rahman erased secularism from the constitution in 1977 while his successor, H.M. Ershard — another military ruler — made Islam the state religion in 1988.

In 2011, the government led by the center-left Awami League Party, reinstated secularism in principle to the constitution following a Supreme Court ruling in 2009.

However, it kept Islam as the state religion out of fear of losing votes.

Religious minorities have applauded the move to look at the state religion issue.

The court’s decision to review the petition is a matter great hope for religious minorities, said Bishop Bejoy N. D’Cruze of Sylhet, chairman of the Catholic bishops’ Christian Unity and Interreligious Dialogue Commission.

“When a state officially accepts a state religion, then it puts barricades for communal harmony because it recognizes supremacy of a particular religion and makes other religions inferior,” Bishop D’Cruze told ucanews.com.

Recent extremist attacks on religious minorities are an indirect consequence of the constitutional provision of a state religion, he said.

“We hope and demand that every religion in Bangladesh are put on an equal footing in terms of status and respect,” he added.

By sponsoring Islam as an official religion, the state has created grounds for the persecution of minorities, especially Hindus, says Govinda Chadra Pramanik, secretary of Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance.

“The state religion established the supremacy of Islam over other religions, offering a weapon to radical Islamists to abuse minority communities. Moreover, Islam gets more attention from the state, not other religions, which is an obstacle to interfaith harmony,” he told ucanews.com.

State backing for Islam has slowly developed communalism and contributed to the dwindling Hindu population in Bangladesh, Pramanik added.

“As the state religion, Islam put psychological pressure on minorities, and makes them vulnerable to abuse and exploitation. The [Supreme] court must come to the right decision and withdraw it,” he added.

Nirmol Rozario, secretary of Bangladesh Christian Association echoed the call.

“Since 1988, we have been opposing Islam as the state religion. Religion is a personal matter and a democratic state can’t have an official religion,” Rozario told ucanews.com.

“This is nothing but an effort to dominate other religions in the country. It must stop.”

About 90 percent of Bangladesh’s population is Muslim, eight percent are Hindus while the rest belong to other religions including Buddhism and Christianity.

Top Bangladesh court reviews Islam as state religion ucanews.com
 
.
A person who publicly opposes Islam has no right to call himself a Muslim.

And don't you dare twist my words. I never said anything against Islam or opposed Islam. I just don't think that the state should be involved with religion. You have flag of Australia flying there. I assume you live in Australia and so do many millions of Muslims live in states of the West that are not Islamic Republics. They are fine. You are fine. So if they are fine why can't Bangladesh be fine?

If living a in secular state is haram why do millions of Muslim contine to live in secular states and more migrate there? Bottome line > One can be good Muslim and live in secular state. So ditto for Bangladesh.
 
.
Al-Baqara 256

Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things.

And the words of Imam Jafar as-Sadiq

“If you find see something you don’t like in a brother, try to find 1-70 excuses for him. And if you can’t find an excuse, say ‘There might be an excuse, but I don’t know it.’ “

If a man addresses his brother as, ‘O’ Disbeliever’ (Kaafir) it returns to one of them; either it is as he said or it returns to him.” Sahih Bukhari 10/427 and Sahih Muslim 60, Narrated by Ibn Umar

You are explicitly opposing Islam, you know that?

And don't you dare twist my words. I never said anything against Islam or opposed Islam. I just don't think that the state should be involved with religion. You have flag of Australia flying there. I assume you live in Australia and so do many millions of Muslims live in states of the West that are not Islamic Republics. They are fine. You are fine. So if they are fine why can't Bangladesh be fine?

If living a in secular state is haram why do millions of Muslim contine to live in secular states and more migrate there? Bottome line > One can be good Muslim and live in secular state. So ditto for Bangladesh.

The issue is not living in a secular state. The issue is with mking a Muslim majority country a secular state, when Sharia should be imposed on Muslim majority lands


But then again this is the apostate treacherous state called Bangladesh, wouldn't expect anything else of it.


Thank God we have Pakistan. We need to improve it and make it a true Islamic state as it should be.
 
. .
You are explicitly opposing Islam, you know that?



The issue is not living in a secular state. The issue is with mking a Muslim majority country a secular state, when Sharia should be imposed on Muslim majority lands


But then again this is the apostate treacherous state called Bangladesh, wouldn't expect anything else of it.


Thank God we have Pakistan. We need to improve it and make it a true Islamic state as it should be.

You prefer to live in Australia than a Sharia imposed country. You are not alone. Millions of Muslims do. Why?
 
.
Sharia should be imposed on Muslim majority lands

Why? If living a in a secular state is acceptable and is NOT deleterious to a Muslim as is evidenced by millions living in and choosing to live in secular states why and how does it become incumbent to enforce sharia in a majority Muslim state when actually they are safer from going on the wrong path as they will be surrounded by other faithfull.

It is the Muslim's living in Muslim minority states that are exposed to and in danger of bad influences thus logic would suggest they need protection of legal structure like enforced sharia\.

There is disconnect and contradiction in your suggestion if not outright hypocracy.


That is million dollar question. I have never got a satisfactory answer to that. These as*holes will catch the first flight out to Western secular countries and then worry about the Muslims left behind in Muslim majority countries as if they are in danger but these as*holes choosing to live in secular countries are immune and don't need Islamic republic to safegaurd their faith.
 
.
After Rash of Islamist Killings, Bangladesh High Court Considers Eliminating Islam as State Religion

After Rash of Islamist Killings, Bangladesh High Court Considers Eliminating Islam as State Religion
163
0
protest-against-murders-of-secular-writers-bloggers-publishers-in-bangladesh-AP-640x480.jpg

AP Photo/ A.M. Ahad

by Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D.1 Mar 201693

After a recent spate of killings of members of religious minorities by Islamic extremists, the supreme court of Bangladesh has begun hearing arguments challenging Islam’s privileged status as official state religion, a measure applauded by religious liberty activists and minority leaders.
In 1988, Bangladesh’s military government amended the country’s constitution to declare Islam as the official state religion. That very same year, a group of 15 prominent writers, former judges, educators and cultural activists filed a petition contesting the legitimacy of the move, but the courts did not act to review the petition until now.

In recent months Bangladesh has experienced a “surge in killings” of members of Hindu, Christian and Shi’ite religious minorities, which authorities have said are the work of Islamic extremist groups.

Despite warnings from U.S. intelligence that the Islamic State is stepping up recruitment activity in the South Asian country, the Bangladeshi government has insisted that its Islamist problems are home grown.

“We have made arrests on each and every so-called ISIS-claimed attack,” said one Bangladesh police official. “The attackers have confessed their crimes in court. They have also confessed being a Jamaatul Mujahedin Bangladesh member, and denied any linkage with ISIS,” he said.

On February 29, Bangladesh’s Supreme Court officially began hearing arguments on the petition disputing the constitutionality of the adoption of Islam as the state religion.

Bangladesh’s original constitution, adopted soon after the nation split from Pakistan in 1971, declared the country to be a secular state.

It was the military ruler H. M. Ershard who decreed Islam to be the state religion in 1988, inserting an eighth amendment to the constitution to that effect. The legality of that move is what is now being disputed.

Religious minority leaders have commended the high court’s move to reexamine the state religion issue.

Bishop Bejoy N. D’Cruze of Sylhet, chairman of the Catholic bishops’ Christian Unity and Interreligious Dialogue Commission, said that the decision to review the petition inspires great hope for religious minorities.

“When a state officially accepts a state religion, then it puts barricades for communal harmony because it recognizes supremacy of a particular religion and makes other religions inferior,” D’Cruze said, adding that recent extremist attacks on religious minorities are an indirect consequence of the adoption of a state religion.

“We hope and demand that every religion in Bangladesh are put on an equal footing in terms of status and respect,” he said.

Another religious leader, Govinda Chadra Pramanik, secretary of Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance, said that by sponsoring Islam as the official religion, the state has created grounds for the persecution of minorities, especially Hindus.

“The state religion established the supremacy of Islam over other religions, offering a weapon to radical Islamists to abuse minority communities. Moreover, Islam gets more attention from the state, not other religions, which is an obstacle to interfaith harmony,” he said.

“As the state religion, Islam put psychological pressure on minorities, and makes them vulnerable to abuse and exploitation. The court must come to the right decision and withdraw it,” he added.

Muslims make up some 90 percent of Bangladesh’s population, while Hindus account for 8 percent and other religions—including Buddhism and Christianity—make up the rest.
A laudable ideal but unrealistic move. Instead of reopening the old wounds they should have strengthened the constitution to provide more safeguards to minorities. This move to declare secular will only provide the extremists more ammunition to cry anti-islamic and indulge in further atrocities.

More ever BD is not yet a full mature democracy where decisions are taken based on consensus. Decisions taken now will simply be reverted once the current political incumbent is out of power. Which will again lead to clashes.
 
.
So reducing an Islamic country to a secular country is a way to go?

Strange enough, that Bangladesh was created on the basis of linguistic nationalism. So linguistic nationalism and secularism holds higher values than being a Muslim. This is really way to go!

It's called People's Republic of Bangladesh for a reason...

A laudable ideal but unrealistic move. Instead of reopening the old wounds they should have strengthened the constitution to provide more safeguards to minorities. This move to declare secular will only provide the extremists more ammunition to cry anti-islamic and indulge in further atrocities.

More ever BD is not yet a full mature democracy where decisions are taken based on consensus. Decisions taken now will simply be reverted once the current political incumbent is out of power. Which will again lead to clashes.

It has nothing to do with secularism or constitution, but a failure of state to impose law and order. This impacts both non-Muslims and Muslims.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom