What's new

Afghans give Pakistan evidence in Rabbani killing

pakistan cannot run after ghouls and goblins...things that dont exist or has no credible proof of existance.

when did you come across the details of the evidence provided by Afganistan....no one knows what evidence was given you are already here shouting "no credible proof".....is this statement- some kind of nursery Rhyme they teach you in Pakistan that you guys remember so well to repeat every now and then?
 
when did you come across the details of the evidence provided by Afganistan....no one knows what evidence was given you are already here shouting "no credible proof".....is this statement- some kind of nursery Rhyme they teach you in Pakistan that you guys remember so well to repeat every now and then?

And you have direct access to the evidences, that's why you are saying they are credible!!.

Under garments can not make a credible evidence.

As for as nursery rhyme is concern, it is taught in India, titles Pakistan responsible for everything happening in India. Search history if you don't believe me.
 
And you have direct access to the evidences, that's why you are saying they are credible!!.

Under garments can not make a credible evidence.

As for as nursery rhyme is concern, it is taught in India, titles Pakistan responsible for everything happening in India. Search history if you don't believe me.

where have i given a statement accusing anyone one of anything where as safriz did act like he did.....?

and undergarments with genetic material on them do make for evidence if you should know........

your last line(highlighted) is the second line of the nursery rhyme thought to you i guess.....
 
Afghanistan says Pakistan refuses help in Rabbani probe
By AFP
Published: October 4, 2011
KABUL: Afghanistan on Tuesday accused Pakistan of refusing to cooperate with investigations into the killing of Kabul government peace envoy Burhanuddin Rabbani.
“Today we received a message from the embassy of Pakistan saying that since this issue has arisen in media, we cannot cooperate and we apologise for that,” said Mohammad Yasin Zia, deputy head of the National Directorate of Security.
Rabbani’s killing in Kabul on September 20 has prompted Karzai to reconsider his strategy for talking peace with the Taliban.
The NDS, Afghanistan’s intelligence service, said it had handed evidence in Rabbani’s killing to Pakistani officials to take action last Thursday.
It has also alleged that the killer was a Pakistani and the attack was planned in Quetta.
Pakistan has questioned the evidence provided to its embassy in Kabul, and described Rabbani as a great friend of Pakistan, who was widely respected in the country.
 
How can we say afghanistan govt said anything? Karzai is a western appointed quisling who represents american soldiers not afghanisatanis.
 
Yes, he doesn't represents Taliban.

Yes, but gave all facilities and safe heavens to Taliban in Afghanistan for targeting Pakistan. How he showed his pain over killing of Rabbani when kept silence over killing of more than 50 Pakistanis in Dir & Chitral by Afghan's pet Taliban.

Unfortunately people believe on media but reality still reality that even Farsiwans and Pushtun didn't like Rabbani for his brutalism in his period and still remember his inhuman mass people killing orders.
 
In the Afghan villages where Taliban still rule

Talib fighter 'Rahimullah', right, said he was willing to kill his soldier brother
Continue reading the main story
Taliban Conflict

US patience wears thin
Taliban tactical shift
Haqqani militant network
Q&A: Fighting the Taliban
The invasion of Afghanistan that forced the Taliban from power began 10 years ago this week but the Taliban were not completely defeated. The BBC's Paul Wood in Kabul looks at the state of the insurgency today and asks: "Could they be back?"

The wind blows in from an empty desert plain, whipping around a hunched figure kneeling, blindfolded and chained, on the ground. He is about to be executed by the Taliban.

Insurgents with rocket-propelled grenades strapped to their backs assemble an expectant crowd. Many watching have camera-phones - it is how we obtained the pictures.

Standing to one side are three young women wearing burkas. They will kill him.

The man is their uncle. He murdered their parents and two siblings in a dispute over family honour. Their mother was committing adultery, the villagers said. Their father, the condemned man's brother, refused to do anything. The uncle, shamed and enraged, opened fire at a car carrying the whole family.

The man has to pay for killing four people. Blood for blood. Taliban fighters help the girls to hold a heavy Kalashnikov. They are just inches from the man about to die.

"Pull the trigger," says one of the Talibs. "It's easy."

One by one, the women shoot him.

A large crowd has turned out for the execution. They jostle for space on the roof of the smart new community centre built by a Danish NGO. Some, no doubt, are there out of fear of the Taliban. Others enthusiastically shout "God is Great" as sentence is carried out.

"People were happy this man was shot like this," one of those present recalls.

"The Taliban control 20 to 30 villages around here. They catch thieves. People like what they do. The government doesn't punish criminals but the Taliban do."

It is 10 years since the invasion of Afghanistan but Nato still has not beaten the Taliban. So they remain in charge in remote areas like this, a village 60 miles from Herat, in the west of the country.

Continue reading the main story
“
Start Quote

Where Nato has reinforced, in the south, it is pushing the Taliban back. But elsewhere, in the east for instance, the militants have gained ground”

The execution, with the three young women being pushed forward to pull the trigger, was a shocking, even a ghoulish, spectacle. It will draw the condemnation of human rights groups.

But where the Taliban have support, largely in the conservative countryside, it is because of this harsh brand of justice, not in spite of it.

Still, many - probably most - Afghans do not want to see the Taliban back.

They worry about what might have to be given up if the insurgents get even a measure of influence over the life of the nation once again. Over the past week there have been demonstrations in Kabul against doing any kind of deal with the insurgents.

That will depend on what happens on the battlefield. Where Nato has reinforced, in the south, it is pushing the Taliban back. But elsewhere, in the east for instance, the militants have gained ground.

We spoke to militants across the country about why they were fighting.

Many said they had joined the insurgency after relatives were killed by Nato bombing. Some were tired of the conflict but said they would not give up until Nato had left Afghanistan. Most said they could move openly in areas where they once hid from Nato or the Afghan forces. They seemed confident of victory.

One fighter, Mullah Mushk Alam, from Sari Pul province, is worth quoting at length, simply because he is so typical.

"I joined the Taliban about seven or eight months ago," he says.

"I am carrying out jihad against the infidels because they invaded our country. I joined the Taliban because the foreigners kill a lot of people, because they search our houses with dogs, because they search our women and our children in an improper way.

"I joined the Taliban because of this corrupt government.


Many Taliban fighters say they are angry at the actions of Nato forces in their country
"Two of my brothers and my uncle were killed by Nato bombing. When they brought the dead bodies to my house, that was the day I decided to start fighting Nato.

"It's not just me; there are many like me. Day by day the number people joining the Taliban is increasing. Where there were 10 Taliban fighters in one village, now there are 100.

"The Taliban do not pay us. We spend the money to fight from our own pockets. We are winning because Islam will always be victorious."

Most of those interviews were carried out by local cameramen because foreigners stand a good chance of being kidnapped if they travel to Taliban-controlled areas. But I did go to see one Talib fighter, in a house we chose for the interview on the outskirts of Kabul.

I wanted to meet him because his brother is a serving officer in the Afghan army. That seemed extraordinary - though further research revealed that such divided families are not as unusual as you might think.

Sitting cross-legged on the carpeted floor, "Rahimullah" told me he was aged 20 and had been in the Taliban since he was 16. I asked him if he was prepared to kill his brother, the army officer, if necessary. The answer, calmly delivered, was chilling: "Whoever joins the infidels, we will fight them.

"Even if it is my brother, even if it is my father. Our religion requires this."

That seemed both tragic and evidence of the kind of ruthless campaign the Taliban are accused of waging. Did he support, for instance, the use of child suicide bombers by the insurgency?

"We don't force people to do suicide attacks," he said. "They want to sacrifice themselves for their religion."

His older brother, "Abdul Rashid", was not at all ideological. He told me he was in the army just to collect a salary. He did not support either side but, when pressed, said he thought Nato were "infidels", and he feared the insurgents.

"The Taliban control my village," he said. "Elsewhere in the province they have checkpoints on the roads at night everywhere. Without my brother in the Taliban I could be stopped and taken away."

A lieutenant, he was second-in-command of 80 men. Would he help the Taliban if they asked him? An officer in uniform could be a valuable asset to the insurgents.

High-profile attacks
"If the Taliban put pressure on me, I will have to do it for them," he replied miserably.

That was just one family, in one province, Wardak. But the contrast between the reluctant army officer and his committed Talib brother is not good for Nato. The whole strategy to get out of Afghanistan relies on handing over to the local forces, which Nato hopes will fight the Taliban vigorously.


Nato believes that, overall, things are going its way. According to its figures, violence is down nationwide 7% over the year, falling 27% in one of the most difficult provinces, Helmand.

But behind the statistics are high-profile attacks like those in Kabul recently, which have massive strategic impact. The Taliban are not winning but they are not exactly losing, either.

Following the assassination of former President Burhanuddin Rabbani, the Afghan government has suspended efforts to reach out to the insurgents.

But few doubt that, eventually, they will have to talk to the people behind the attacks in Kabul and executions in the countryside.

BBC News - In the Afghan villages where Taliban still rule
 
Why do they need ISI help... their intel agency knows everything, right?
 
they are asking for ISI help :rofl:
According to them ISI is supporting terrorism then why they are asking for help from terrorist :mamba:
for Afghan officials i only want to say one word nothing more nothing less Pathetic
 
It was the most appropriate answer Pak government Give. When they like to drag this matter on media and whine like children then so be it. Afghan Intelligence on one side side blame us and on other side they want our help us in this matter. What a irony
 
Afghanistan says Pakistan refuses help in Rabbani probe
By AFP
Published: October 4, 2011
KABUL: Afghanistan on Tuesday accused Pakistan of refusing to cooperate with investigations into the killing of Kabul government peace envoy Burhanuddin Rabbani.
“Today we received a message from the embassy of Pakistan saying that since this issue has arisen in media, we cannot cooperate and we apologise for that,” said Mohammad Yasin Zia, deputy head of the National Directorate of Security.
Rabbani’s killing in Kabul on September 20 has prompted Karzai to reconsider his strategy for talking peace with the Taliban.
The NDS, Afghanistan’s intelligence service, said it had handed evidence in Rabbani’s killing to Pakistani officials to take action last Thursday.
It has also alleged that the killer was a Pakistani and the attack was planned in Quetta.
Pakistan has questioned the evidence provided to its embassy in Kabul, and described Rabbani as a great friend of Pakistan, who was widely respected in the country.

Just another example of the fact that despite many attempts by the Afghan gov to have cordial relations with Pakistan, they get a cold and hostile reaction from their Pakistani counterparts. The investigation will now most likely will be referred to UN.Funny thing is that just afew days ago Gilani assured full cooperation in the investigation regarding the death of Rabbani, looks like PA once again reminded the civilian leadership who is incharge of their foreign policy towards some countries.
 
Back
Top Bottom