Afghan transit trade'Treaty being used to bypass NATO supply suspension’

[53fd]

See UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Part X, Article 125 -

"Land-locked States shall have the right of access to and from the sea for the purpose of exercising the rights provided for in this Convention including those relating to the freedom of the high seas and the common heritage of mankind. To this end, land-locked States shall enjoy freedom of transit through the territory of transit States by all means of transport."

Again, the NATO also violated all UN resolutions as well when they killed Pakistani soldiers.

 

[Peregrine]

May be their Indian brothers, can build a flyover, connecting incredible india to amazing afghanistan. There you go....... YAY!!!!!!!!!!!! all troubles solved.......

 

[Albatross]

See UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Part X, Article 125 -

"Land-locked States shall have the right of access to and from the sea for the purpose of exercising the rights provided for in this Convention including those relating to the freedom of the high seas and the common heritage of mankind. To this end, land-locked States shall enjoy freedom of transit through the territory of transit States by all means of transport."

My Good for nuthing eastern neighbour this convention would have held some ground had pak been the only state to provide the land route ...wat abt iran and other sates on the north west...why dun they take the responsibilty to feed afhangis...

 

[isro2222]

This is what america wanted.... Something huge coming soon.... Feels sad about pakistan.... They took on uncle sam and pakistani people would pay for it.... i wish nothing happens.... America got something in mind....

 

[Luftwaffe]

This is what america wanted.... Something huge coming soon.... Feels sad about pakistan.... They took on uncle sam and pakistani people would pay for it.... i wish nothing happens.... America got something in mind....

WRONG! I have been reading all sorts of paranoid posts from TT, Opinionators and other members that this and that will happen, It does not take a genius to to look around Iran and N. Koreans are all clear and untouchable how would it be be so grave for Pakistan, just paranoid people with fanatical futurama thoughts. American is facing huge economic problems, failures in all Wars and one by allays leaving US.

We know Pakistan will face severest sanctions similar to Iran post afghan war indefinitely, We Pakistan needs to be prepared for it, we need to stand to it and make better friends in our neighborhood and middle east. In the end Pakistan needs to realize no one might come to rescue us so we have to have a realistic plans for Pakistan as to how to run post sanctioned Pakistan by the world. Neither did Iran die nor did N. Korea it is foolish to assume we will turn dust with amrika-europe's severest punishments, we will not 170 million people can make a difference.

 

[PWFI]

You do know that by doing all this, you are playing right into the hands of India.. The more afghans hate Pakistan (as they see Pakistan's true face), the easier it is for India..

These are few afghan nationalist who hate pakistan, all will be well it's matter of time

 

[regular]

This is what america wanted.... Something huge coming soon.... Feels sad about pakistan.... They took on uncle sam and pakistani people would pay for it.... i wish nothing happens.... America got something in mind....

Yes! U are right about that something very big has been planned by the US against Pakistan.....and we already know what is that....They planned false flag operations in US, India and UK/Europe.... So that they can blame on Pakistan and unanimously attack/overrun it completely..........We already knowing what is cooking inside their mindz......

 

[Omar1984]

Hmm.. Lets see

1. Pakistan civilians regularly killed by American drones
2. Pakistani soldiers regularly killed by NATO forces
3. American boots on the ground operation happens 60 miles from the Pakistani capital
4. USA drones operate out of Pakistan air bases

ok.. Pakistan only belongs to Pakistanis.. if you insist..

The rulers of Pakistan have the same slavery inferiority complex like you indians but not the people of Pakistan. 99% of Pakistanis want U.S. to leave the region and want Islamabad to stop cooperating with U.S./NATO in this war OF terror.

---------- Post added at 02:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:23 PM ----------

WRONG! I have been reading all sorts of paranoid posts from TT, Opinionators and other members that this and that will happen, It does not take a genius to to look around Iran and N. Koreans are all clear and untouchable how would it be be so grave for Pakistan, just paranoid people with fanatical futurama thoughts. American is facing huge economic problems, failures in all Wars and one by allays leaving US.

We know Pakistan will face severest sanctions similar to Iran post afghan war indefinitely, We Pakistan needs to be prepared for it, we need to stand to it and make better friends in our neighborhood and middle east. In the end Pakistan needs to realize no one might come to rescue us so we have to have a realistic plans for Pakistan as to how to run post sanctioned Pakistan by the world. Neither did Iran die nor did N. Korea it is foolish to assume we will turn dust with amrika-europe's severest punishments, we will not 170 million people can make a difference.

Brother Pakistan was under U.S. sanctions in the 90's and Pakistan was doing way better then than now.

 

[TARIQ BN ZIYAAD]

Assalam alaikum

yaro yeh sub problem hi iss wot ki waja say hay otherwise we were not doing that bad

daat jaoooo we r not asking for war, we r asking to secure our borders from terrorists

TARIQ

 

[53fd]

Hmm.. Lets see

1. Pakistan civilians regularly killed by American drones

The fuel needed to operate the drones comes from Pakistan.

2. Pakistani soldiers regularly killed by NATO forces

Yes, & actions are taking place to show them the grave mistake/miscalculation they made.

4. USA drones operate out of Pakistan air bases

You are contradicting what US officials are saying. And anyways, their presence is being clamped down.

 

[Sugarcane]

My Good for nuthing eastern neighbour this convention would have held some ground had pak been the only state to provide the land route ...wat abt iran and other sates on the north west...why dun they take the responsibilty to feed afhangis...

Man how you assume that bhartii will put blame on any other, if they can easily put it on Pak?

 

[SpArK]

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/144657-afghanistan-slow-train.html

 

[Sugarcane]

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/144657-afghanistan-slow-train.html

So????? We are saying to f*** off from our country and spare us from ware Of terror. We don't care what they do on other-side, if they are not bothering us

 

[Omar1984]

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/144657-afghanistan-slow-train.html

Good for them. Good news for Pakistan. Now they should stop asking Pakistan for a supply route.

Pakistanis dont want anything to do with this war OF terror anymore. We rather be neutral like Iran.

As for Russia:

Russia does not allow combat nato supplies to run through its territory and does not allow oil supplies for nato to run through its territory. Oil and combat supplies are the only major supplies of NATO. If you cut that, then NATO operation will severely be affected.

And U.S.-Russian relations are not getting any better:


Russia threatens to cut off NATO supply route to Afghanistan over missile shield dispute

Analysts say Russia could deliver deathblow to Nato

Russia may drop NATO summit over missile defense — RT

Russia Considers Blocking NATO Supply Routes - WSJ.com

 

[Secur]

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/144657-afghanistan-slow-train.html

Russia doesn't want NATO presence in Afghanistan after 2014 ... So best of luck !