Afghan official says General Kayani used 'threatening language' in Brussels

[Cyberian]

I hope not. for one thing violence is just sad period. Secondly for the good of Pakistan...it would mean TTP will have a massive base to operate from. Unless you are blind...actually never mind, carry on.... Yes a Taliban takeover is great for Pakistan.



Mullah Omar has a very one sided view

Come January 2015, TTP will also vanish mysteriously. You guys better pray that all those billions of dollars India has spent on Afghanistan's infrastructure can last a few weeks of advancing Taliban shelling.

 

[IceCold]

Pakistan COAS needs to be taught a lesson on how to talk with the Head of a Sovereign Nation.

This is not Pakistan where he can order and remove the President at his will.

And who is going to teach this lesson...you? Just because no one takes your army chief seriously, does not mean the same for everyone. And by the way what's Indian take on this, i see no reason for your @*** to be on fire. It was something between Pakistan, US and Afghanistan.
And just before you go on another frenzy, there was a reason why our COAS was representing Pakistani side.

 

[Kompromat]

Karzai is extremely corrupt, no doubt about that. But one thing I like about him is how much pain, or "takleef" he causes for Pakistanis from all walks of life. He is like a rock in their shoes. They're not used to a person like him, and would rather see a puppet like Amir al Momineen Mullah Omar rule Kabul, who can only say yes to Pakistan's requests.

You and your delusions. Karzai is a puppy that barks too much,then we slap it,it shuts up. India pats it on the back,feeds him some dollars which they should be spending on their own starving citizens,it barks again only to be slapped once more and make way for internet jackasses to take credit....enough said.

 

[EXPERIMENT]

Come January 2015, TTP will also vanish mysteriously. You guys better pray that all those billions of dollars India has spent on Afghanistan's infrastructure can last a few weeks of advancing Taliban shelling.

Looking forward to it. I hope you realise none of the victims will be my people. Carry On

 

[Contrarian]

And who is going to teach this lesson...you? Just because no one takes your army chief seriously, does not mean the same for everyone. And by the way what's Indian take on this, i see no reason for your @*** to be on fire. It was something between Pakistan, US and Afghanistan.
And just before you go on another frenzy, there was a reason why our COAS was representing Pakistani side.

If it was any of Pakistan's neighobur barring Afganistan, Pakistan would have had to suffer some unpleasant consequences of having an Army Chief talk in a loose way to a Head of a Nation.

That is not how a nation conducts itself. It shows that Pakistan will try to bully the one nation it can.

 

[IceCold]

If it was any of Pakistan's neighobur barring Afganistan, Pakistan would have had to suffer some unpleasant consequences of having an Army Chief talk in a loose way to a Head of a Nation.

That is not how a nation conducts itself. It shows that Pakistan will try to bully the one nation it can.

Ohh really! but you still didn't answer my question, What's your stake in all of this that resulted on all the tough talk?
As for the lose talk well Pakistan does not need to use the same tone with any other neighbor apart from one country in the east and Afghanistan because Pakistan enjoys good relations with them. The tone was used where it was deserved and rightly so.

 

[Cyberian]

Looking forward to it. I hope you realise none of the victims will be my people. Carry On

Will Afghanistan be a launch pad for Jihad-e-Kashmir 2.0? Hmmm, what do you reckon Pakistani military is thinking?

Strange thing that I've noticed this year is, Americans are leaving the Indians high and dry in regards to Afghanistan. Not a single Indian concern is being considered by the Americans and they're more than happy to handover Afghanistan to Pakistan without any pre-conditions or any other demands.

I would even go as far as saying Americans appear to be wanting the Taliban to takeover Afghanistan again.

Must be too much Afghan heat ...

 

[graphican]

I wish Sir Pasha was there in the meeting and Karzai would know what is meaning of aggressiveness.

 

[Contrarian]

Ohh really! but you still didn't answer my question, What's your stake in all of this that resulted on all the tough talk?
As for the lose talk well Pakistan does not need to use the same tone with any other neighbor apart from one country in the east and Afghanistan because Pakistan enjoys good relations with them. The tone was used where it was deserved and rightly so.

Hehe..use this tone with India and you would have some problems, not that Pakistan doesnt already. Pakistan does not have the ability to have its COAS to talk this way with even Iran, let alone India.

Afghanistan, the only country that does not have a strong army would tolerate Pakistani interference till that time.

As i said, all it does is prove that Pakistan is a bully to the one country that is weaker than Pakistan amongst its neighbours.

 

[IceCold]

Hehe..use this tone with India and you would have some problems, not that Pakistan doesnt already. Pakistan does not have the ability to have its COAS to talk this way with even Iran, let alone India.

Afghanistan, the only country that does not have a strong army would tolerate Pakistani interference till that time.

As i said, all it does is prove that Pakistan is a bully to the one country that is weaker than Pakistan amongst its neighbours.

Pakistan has used the same tone with India on more then one occasion when your generals were having wet dreams most recently after 26/11 and the only trouble we got into was.........NOTHING. As for Iran, why would we use such tone with Iran. Pakistan has good relations with Iran Hint IP project. As for Afghanistan, you have no stake in it, you are just an Irk which will be removed pretty soon. Mind you Pakistan used the tone in the presence of US Secretary of state. Now what does that tell you?

 

[Alpha1]

Pakistani Muslims were British colony and ghulam for centuries and it still is which led your inferior DNA double-helix infected with slavery syndrome. And now you talk **** about our country, stinky porkistani

post reported

 

[Markus]

[Pajhwok Afghan News]

Just my observation - the man on the left and the man in the center are really looking smart. No offense but Kayani's body posture just isn't that of a military man !!!

 

[IceCold]

Pakistani Muslims were British colony and ghulam for centuries and it still is which led your inferior DNA double-helix infected with slavery syndrome. And now you talk **** about our country, stinky porkistani

Your inferiority complex is pretty evident from your post. By the way this was same stinky inferior Pakistan that gave refuge to the afghans. But then again why am i not surprised after all you are a bunch of ungrateful b@stards.

Just my observation - the man on the left and the man in the center are really looking smart. No offense but Kayani's body posture just isn't that of a military man !!!

Try to look at it without the Indian lens

 

[EXPERIMENT]

Will Afghanistan be a launch pad for Jihad-e-Kashmir 2.0? Hmmm, what do you reckon Pakistani military is thinking?

Strange thing that I've noticed this year is, Americans are leaving the Indians high and dry in regards to Afghanistan. Not a single Indian concern is being considered by the Americans and they're more than happy to handover Afghanistan to Pakistan without any pre-conditions or any other demands.

I would even go as far as saying Americans appear to be wanting the Taliban to takeover Afghanistan again.

Must be too much Afghan heat ...

May be true time will tell. I know our borders get more secure everyday. The frustrated Jihad-e-Kashmir 2.0 agitators may again come home to roost. Like I said time will tell.

 

[Kompromat]