What's new

Acoustic signature of Type 095 submarine ????

RAMPAGE

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
5,855
Reaction score
4
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
If anybody has a source/info then please share.
 
PLAN and Chinese military in general do not release technical specifications of their weapons systems, especially one as strategically sensitive as their nuclear subs. It's part of their strategy of keeping adversaries in the dark about their true capabilities. Any info out there is just guess work and speculation by 'experts' in the field.
 
PLAN and Chinese military in general do not release technical specifications of their weapons systems, especially one as strategically sensitive as their nuclear subs. It's part of their strategy of keeping adversaries in the dark about their true capabilities. Any info out there is just guess work and speculation by 'experts' in the field.

I have already posted a topic the Type 093G weeks ago.

The Type 093G has incorporated a lot of similar technologies to the Seawolf/Virginia class SSN, but due the limitation of its hull design and nuclear reactor, it is still inferior to the best SSN of the USN.

So this means the Type 095 is expected to catch up.
 
What in the world made you think a bunch of random dudes on internet have access to classified information on a nuclear attack submarine? Does this place look like NSA to you?
 
What in the world made you think a bunch of random dudes on internet have access to classified information on a nuclear attack submarine? Does this place look like NSA to you?

As i said before, it is semi-official.

Huanqiu.com in last year just reported the specification of the base Type 093, it is close to the LA class.

CPC would leak some info of the previous generation if they got the newer one.
 
As i said before, it is semi-official.

Huanqiu.com in last year just reported the specification of the base Type 093, it is close to the LA class.

CPC would leak some info of the previous generation if they got the newer one.

Why do the Chinese gov makes these strange leaks? The J-20 and J-31 is an perfect example of that. Will the 095 boomer be the main SLBM of the PLAN or occupy as an nuclear powered attack Sub like the Varginia?
 
Why do the Chinese gov makes these strange leaks? The J-20 and J-31 is an perfect example of that. Will the 095 boomer be the main SLBM of the PLAN or occupy as an nuclear powered attack Sub like the Varginia?


You can't hide a fighter jet, but you can hide a submarine. :p:
 
Why do the Chinese gov makes these strange leaks? The J-20 and J-31 is an perfect example of that. Will the 095 boomer be the main SLBM of the PLAN or occupy as an nuclear powered attack Sub like the Varginia?

The Type 096 will be the SSBN of the new generation, while the Type 095 is the SSN.
 
what exaclty is the acoustic signature of a submarine, can someone explain in layman's terms???It would be highly appreciated....
 
PLAN and Chinese military in general do not release technical specifications of their weapons systems, especially one as strategically sensitive as their nuclear subs. It's part of their strategy of keeping adversaries in the dark about their true capabilities. Any info out there is just guess work and speculation by 'experts' in the field.
This is a very sensible post and I hope the Chinese members here think twice the next time they have the urge to bring up that silly story about a Song class sub surfacing near the Kitty Hawk just to show off Chinese sub capability.
 
No country releases such sensitive information whatsoever.
All info already available for older subs is for publishing purposes only.
 
This is a very sensible post and I hope the Chinese members here think twice the next time they have the urge to bring up that silly story about a Song class sub surfacing near the Kitty Hawk just to show off Chinese sub capability.

You know that was true, you just don't want to admit it because it stings your ego.

Even Larry Wortzel told this actually happened and it wasn't made up.

The US Navy got royally embarrassed.

Just deal with it.
 
Back
Top Bottom