As I said, 'window dressing', showing 'growth' with the stroke of a pen, many corporates also do it to jack up profits/revenue or to hide it.
India to Recalibrate GDP Measurement in 2015
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As I said, 'window dressing', showing 'growth' with the stroke of a pen, many corporates also do it to jack up profits/revenue or to hide it.
Illegal drugs and prostitution boosted the economy by £9.7bn – equal to 0.7% of gross domestic product – in 2009, according to the ONS's first official estimate.
No one can beat the Brits on the subject of "GDP adjustments":
:
Drugs and prostitution to be included in UK national accounts
Contribution of drug dealers and prostitutes to the UK economy boosted figures by £10bn according to estimates
29 May 2014 20.13 BST
Drugs and prostitution contributed £10bn to the UK economy in 2009.
George Osborne famously declared "we are all in this together" when it comes to Britain's prosperity. The Office for National Statistics has now taken him at his word, adding up the contribution made by prostitutes and drug dealers.
For the first time official statisticians are measuring the value to the UK economy of sex work and drug dealing – and they have discovered these unsavoury hidden-economy trades make roughly the same contribution as farming – and only slightly less than book and newspaper publishers added together.
Illegal drugs and prostitution boosted the economy by £9.7bn – equal to 0.7% of gross domestic product – in 2009, according to the ONS's first official estimate.
A breakdown of the data shows sex work generated £5.3bn for the economy that year, with another £4.4bn lift from a combination of cannabis, heroin, powder cocaine, crack cocaine, ecstasy and amphetamines.
According to the estimates there were 60,879 prostitutes in the UK in 2009, who had an average of 25 clients per week – each paying on average £67.16 per visit.
There is also detailed data on drugs. The statisticians reckon there were 2.2 million cannabis users in the UK in 2009, toking their way through weed worth more than £1.2bn. They calculate that half of that was home-grown – costing £154m in heat, light and "raw materials" to produce.
The ONS will work in the coming months to bring the data more up to date. The figures will then be included in the broad category of household spending on "miscellaneous goods and services" alongside life insurance, personal care products and post office charges.
The more inclusive approach brings the ONS into line with European Union rules, and will eventually allow comparisons of the size of the shadow economy in different member states.
Joe Grice, chief economic adviser at the ONS, said: "As economies develop and evolve, so do the statistics we use to measure them. These improvements are going on across the world and we are working with our partners in Europe and the wider world on the same agenda.
"Here in the UK these reforms will help ONS to continue delivering the best possible economic statistics to inform key decisions in government and business."
The new elements will be published in the national accounts from September onwards, supplementing the more traditional measures of GDP including construction and manufacturing output. By comparison, the construction sector contributed around £90bn to the UK economy in 2009, and manufacturing £150bn.
The ONS said that in every year between 1997 and 2009 prostitution and illegal drugs boosted the economy by between £7bn and £11bn. Combined with other changes to the national accounts from September, £33bn or 2.3% will be added to the 2009 level of GDP, the ONS said.
Graeme Walker, head of national accounts for the ONS, acknowledged there were limitations to measuring the value of illegal activities to the economy, but said it was a useful exercise nevertheless.
"It's a model-based estimate but one that serves a purpose for the picture of the overall economy."
He said the ONS would attempt to "fill in the gaps" left by available studies but it would be impossible to measure illegal activities as accurately as other components of GDP. Other activities are measured using questionnaires but the response rate in the sex and drugs trades are unlikely to be high.
Alan Clarke, a UK economist at Scotiabank, said that although the government would not feel the benefit of illegal work in terms of income tax take, there would be a spending boost.
"A drug dealer or prostitute won't necessarily pay tax on that £10bn, but the government will get tax receipts when they spend their income on a pimped up car or bling phone."
Steve Pudney, professor of economics at the University of Essex, said he was sceptical about the methods used by the ONS to estimate the size of the drugs market.
"In my view, the ONS estimate of the size of the drug market is unlikely to be very accurate. It rests on some heroically large assumptions which would be difficult to test, and it also uses a measure of demand that is likely to understate systematically the true scale of drug use."
He added: "They are using a demand-side approach which loosely involves multiplying a survey estimate of the number of drug users by another estimate of the amount consumed by the average user.
"Average retail prices of drugs come from other sources – mainly police/customs/security service intelligence sources – and, multiplying this by the estimated demand, gives the size of the market in cash terms."
Adds almost 1% to the economy. That's a huge elections selling point in multi-party democracies.
True, that's why some states of America legalized marijuana consumption, more tax and GDP.
The Soviets were approx. 60% the size of the US economy in 1990. This implies that they may have even been higher in preceding years, maybe as high as 65%-70% though I don't know about that. The Japanese are the only one's to have reached, in total economic size relative to the US, where the Chinese are now.
In fact, lots of people don't know this, but in one quarter of a financial year, at the height of the asset bubble, Japan became the largest economy in the world.
Good way to push down that pesky 'debt to GDP' ratio for some of the European countries and meet EU fiscal requirements.
So, with the Chinese revision, what's the new nominal value of its GDP?
And then US fixed that
China is using accounting tricks to cook the books. In the civilized world you would get jailed for doing that. In China it is a state practise. Eventually the stench will arise but only two fold and the market correction will cause not so nice things.
]
Adding in Hollywood royalties may boost US economic growth by as much as 3%. Such creative accounting cannot end well.
Hollywood royalties, for instance, are not secure measures of investment. That's because, even in Hollywood, it's hard to measure what royalties are, or should be. Studios rely on notoriously tricksy accounting.
Turkey's official statistics agency says it is preparing for a revision in calculating the country's per capita gross domestic product (GDP), a step that it expects will put the average income figures at a higher level.
The decision comes amid criticism by economists that Turkey is stuck in the middle-income trap, adding that the emerging country's per capita income in dollar terms has stalled for seven years. Turkish Statistics Institute (TurkStat) Chairman Birol Aydemir told reporters over the weekend in Ankara that the agency “will recalculate Turkey's income per capita, using a more diversified calculation system with increased data.”
TurkStat made a similar revision back in 2008, boosting the GDP per capita figures by $2,000 in one day.