foxbat
SENIOR MEMBER

- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 4,093
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
I would like to strongly object to the phrase Indian Terrorist Army by some members of the forum, specifically Jana. Indian Army is an instrument of Indian state working under the control of GoI. Now understandably, there is a dispute between India and Pakistan on Kashmir, but that does not allow anyone to start abusing the army of India.
Or that can lead to a free for all where Indians also start calling Pakistan Army and other state bodies whatever they feel like. We have recently seen that there is very little moderation that can be done by banning people, since all it takes to come back is a new id and a new IP.
I saw multiple posts where respected senior members said that soldiers (even enemy soldiers) need to be respected. Does than rule not apply to certain people ?
EDIT: I saw some great policy decisions by the admins around encouragement of terrorism, taking digs at Hinduism etc. I think something on the same lines is needed here as well
Or that can lead to a free for all where Indians also start calling Pakistan Army and other state bodies whatever they feel like. We have recently seen that there is very little moderation that can be done by banning people, since all it takes to come back is a new id and a new IP.
I saw multiple posts where respected senior members said that soldiers (even enemy soldiers) need to be respected. Does than rule not apply to certain people ?
EDIT: I saw some great policy decisions by the admins around encouragement of terrorism, taking digs at Hinduism etc. I think something on the same lines is needed here as well
Last edited: