A white supremacist Islamophobe Veteran of US army

[nahtanbob]

That is very strange because in germany arabs, turks and iranians are considered middle eastern people and very different than germans with respect to skin colour.

for a black person in America these Middle Easterners would be "White" or "ethnic White"

 

[maximuswarrior]

No wonder they end up begging for Taliban talks.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

hes not a army dude. his body language and speech is wrong and don't match to what hes communicating. looks like a low life pretending to be solider because he couldn't get a refund or what not. soldiers dont talk like this.

To be frank, most soldiers are uneducated and lack the ability to think for themselves, this is because army is a backup for students with poor grades for many.

American South and Midwest, some of the most economically deprived and illiterate regions provide the most recruits.

That is very strange because in germany arabs, turks and iranians are considered middle eastern people and very different than germans with respect to skin colour and facial features. Also in germany the people are designated according to their nationalities and not based on their color. So in germany you are what your nationality is irrespective of your skin color.

That’s the traditional way humans have grouped each other, which is by tribe, ethnicity, nationality, and religion/sect.

America is an aberration of history, where skin color is the primary base of social preference and hierarchy.

It is not about who you are, but what you can pass off as.

This is because most whites in America are mixed race, aside from recent immigrants from Former USSR. Many white Americans have Native American mixture (from kidnapping and rape) and Black mixture (from slavery.)

America is essentially a pan-White/pseudo-European supremacist society masquerading as a liberal Democracy.

Everything is determined by your skin color, including even your chance of birth, being raised economically deprived and suffering malnutrition, having a single parent, marriage prospects, success and affiliations in university, and chances of landing a job.

Most of us immigrants and children of immigrants have to work extra hard to be successful than the average white American, while Blacks and Latinos our doubted and stereotyped at every step. We are still above them on the social hierarchy

I have noticed that many middle eastern people irrespective of their ethnicity (arab, kurd, persian etc.) worship white skinned people of European origin. I never understood really their fettish about white skinned europeans.

Inferiority complex and ethnofascist racial supremacy based on pseudo-history.

All three of the groups you mentioned were dark-skinned people for the vast majority of their history, until the arrival of Turks, European Colonizers, and historically recent Iranic invaders.

 

[xyxmt]

TBF White Americans are dying out and being replaced by Mexicans, Latinos, Blacks, East Asians etc. They are very much painfully aware of this and are lashing out. Less than 40% of the Births in 2015 in America were White. If Whites are becoming a minority in their own nations then you will expect them to become more racist and right wing.



PS White Americans hate Arabs with a passion yet the Arabs love them and consider non-Muslim Arabs sub-human.........The irony.........

True, their main source of hatred is browns mostly Latinos/mexicans, It is just convenient to vent their anger against Arabs and Muslim because it is considered an accepted behavior in the US.

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

This is because most whites in America are mixed race, aside from recent immigrants from Former USSR. Many white Americans have Native American mixture (from kidnapping and rape) and Black mixture (from slavery.).

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/...-melting-pot-appear-overblown-if-youre-white/

Wanting to know your ancestry is a powerful motivator that many DNA testing companies such as 23andMe and Ancestry.com have exploited for great profit. But apart from individual curiosity, genetic studies into our ancestry also offer the ability to peer into the history books, offering a DNA time machine, and a unique window into the history of civilized people.

In the largest study of its kind conducted so far, researchers at 23andMe and Harvard University have published the results of a genetic analysis of ancestry among the American people.

The study itself is quite impressive, conducted with 160,000 people who agreed to allow their data to be used anonymously for research purposes when they submitted their DNA for analysis with 23andMe. Such huge sample numbers, which are “an order of magnitude bigger” according to an author of the study, allows for a much more thorough analysis than ever before, helping the authors produce a detailed geographical map of ancestry in the United States. Three major population groups considered in the study: African-Americans, European Americans and Latinos.

Broadly, the genomic analysis found that on an average the African American genome was 73.2 percent African, 24 percent European and 0.8 percent Native American. Latinos as expected had significantly more Native American ancestry with the average Latino genome being 18 percent Native American, 65.1 percent European and 6.2 percent African.

With respect to European Americans, the percentages are much more different than African Americans or Latinos, with European American genomes being 98.6 percent European, 0.19 percent African and 0.18 percent Native American. In general, the numbers seem to agree with what one would expect given the history of American colonization by Europeans and their interactions with African and Native Americans.

It should be noted that these are averages across populations that say nothing about any individual. Any one person could have significant amounts of ancestral DNA from other populations, including ones not captured in these statistics. And increased marriage among ethnic and racial populations will change these numbers over time.

Detailed percentages of ancestry in the various geographical regions showed relatively wide variations in the ancestry which seem to corroborate historical events.

What are the social implications of this study? DNA does not confer identity. The title of Carl Zimmer’s New York Times article on the research “White? Black? A Murky Distinction Grows Still Murkier,” seems to suggest that the genetic data show that racial divides have significantly blurred as populations have mixed

In the United States, there is a long tradition of trying to draw sharp lines between ethnic groups, but our ancestry is a fluid and complex matter.

“We use these terms — white, black, Indian, Latino — and they don’t really mean what we think they mean,” said Claudio Saunt, a historian at the University of Georgia who was not involved in the study.

Geneticist Razib Khan, who is of Indian ancestry, has a different view however (emphasis his):

What genetics is showing is that in fact white Americans are shockingly European to an incredibly high degree for a population with roots on this continent for 400 years. If we removed all the history that we take for granted we’d be amazed that the indigenous peoples had so little demographic impact, and, that the larger numbers of people of partial African ancestry did not move into the general “white” population.

Steve Sailer, a long time writer on race and ethnicity, agrees with Khan, with some quick back–of–the envelope calculations to show how…

…whiteness in modern America turns out to be not very murky at all. These findings of 0.19 percent black and 0.18 percent American Indian are tiny numbers.

Think about your family tree back nine generations ago, which would mostly be in the 1700s. You have 512 slots in your family tree nine generations ago (two to the ninth power). The 23andMe numbers suggest that for the average white American, 1 of your 512 ancestors nine generations ago was black and 1 of 512 was Native American.

Here’s another way to think of it. If the average self-identified black is 73.2 percent black and the average self-identified white is 0.19 percent black, then the average black in America is 385 times blacker than the average white. That doesn’t seem very murky to me.

 

[KhalaiMakhlooq]

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/...-melting-pot-appear-overblown-if-youre-white/

Wanting to know your ancestry is a powerful motivator that many DNA testing companies such as 23andMe and Ancestry.com have exploited for great profit. But apart from individual curiosity, genetic studies into our ancestry also offer the ability to peer into the history books, offering a DNA time machine, and a unique window into the history of civilized people.

In the largest study of its kind conducted so far, researchers at 23andMe and Harvard University have published the results of a genetic analysis of ancestry among the American people.

The study itself is quite impressive, conducted with 160,000 people who agreed to allow their data to be used anonymously for research purposes when they submitted their DNA for analysis with 23andMe. Such huge sample numbers, which are “an order of magnitude bigger” according to an author of the study, allows for a much more thorough analysis than ever before, helping the authors produce a detailed geographical map of ancestry in the United States. Three major population groups considered in the study: African-Americans, European Americans and Latinos.

Broadly, the genomic analysis found that on an average the African American genome was 73.2 percent African, 24 percent European and 0.8 percent Native American. Latinos as expected had significantly more Native American ancestry with the average Latino genome being 18 percent Native American, 65.1 percent European and 6.2 percent African.

With respect to European Americans, the percentages are much more different than African Americans or Latinos, with European American genomes being 98.6 percent European, 0.19 percent African and 0.18 percent Native American. In general, the numbers seem to agree with what one would expect given the history of American colonization by Europeans and their interactions with African and Native Americans.

It should be noted that these are averages across populations that say nothing about any individual. Any one person could have significant amounts of ancestral DNA from other populations, including ones not captured in these statistics. And increased marriage among ethnic and racial populations will change these numbers over time.

Detailed percentages of ancestry in the various geographical regions showed relatively wide variations in the ancestry which seem to corroborate historical events.

What are the social implications of this study? DNA does not confer identity. The title of Carl Zimmer’s New York Times article on the research “White? Black? A Murky Distinction Grows Still Murkier,” seems to suggest that the genetic data show that racial divides have significantly blurred as populations have mixed

In the United States, there is a long tradition of trying to draw sharp lines between ethnic groups, but our ancestry is a fluid and complex matter.

“We use these terms — white, black, Indian, Latino — and they don’t really mean what we think they mean,” said Claudio Saunt, a historian at the University of Georgia who was not involved in the study.

Geneticist Razib Khan, who is of Indian ancestry, has a different view however (emphasis his):

What genetics is showing is that in fact white Americans are shockingly European to an incredibly high degree for a population with roots on this continent for 400 years. If we removed all the history that we take for granted we’d be amazed that the indigenous peoples had so little demographic impact, and, that the larger numbers of people of partial African ancestry did not move into the general “white” population.

Steve Sailer, a long time writer on race and ethnicity, agrees with Khan, with some quick back–of–the envelope calculations to show how…

…whiteness in modern America turns out to be not very murky at all. These findings of 0.19 percent black and 0.18 percent American Indian are tiny numbers.

Think about your family tree back nine generations ago, which would mostly be in the 1700s. You have 512 slots in your family tree nine generations ago (two to the ninth power). The 23andMe numbers suggest that for the average white American, 1 of your 512 ancestors nine generations ago was black and 1 of 512 was Native American.

Here’s another way to think of it. If the average self-identified black is 73.2 percent black and the average self-identified white is 0.19 percent black, then the average black in America is 385 times blacker than the average white. That doesn’t seem very murky to me.

good post!

 

[oprih]

Disgusting, this is how murica show that ther are real friends and allies of Muslims, by harassing them, and bombing their home countries.

 

[nahtanbob]

The biggest failure are the rulers of the Muslim countries who instead of creating just democratic society have been involved in corruption, dictatorships, arbitrary laws, weak governance and nepotism. The independence after colonial rule has meant the rule of dictators resulting in populace turning to violence and militancy which brings civil wars and foreign invasions. Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen had been destroyed by native rulers. Pakistan should also blame Asif Zardari and Nawaz Sharif of looting the country. Even Pakistan Army and ISI has created only problems for Pakistan by supporting the barbaric Talibans in Afghanistan which resulted in US invasion. Nobody can count all the dead bodies of Muslim civilians in these countries numbering nearly 10 million. When these foreign soldiers come they target the local population with impunity. This soldier was symptom of the disease brought by our own incompetent and corrupt leaders.

failure of the leaders of the Muslim countries is a reflection of failure of citizens

 

[oprih]

Racism is the national sport in murica.