A United Muslim Central Asia

[Vinod2070]

... so now you dont know? the mothers of many mughal kings were HINDUS ! the so called protectors of your faith were the first ones to bow and presented their daughters ... and today their children consider others inferior?

So these rulers had Hindu blood in their veins.

It was probably mazboori. But far better than completely surrender their faith and convert to an alien ideology that just doesn't belong to this civilized land.

 

[priti]

Based on India's insistence. Otherwise it would have remained out of it.

similarly india shoulld be OIC.

 

[Aka123]

The OIC doesn't do anything! I chose these specific countries because we share borders with them, The Arab countries have their Arab League. We will have a league of our own.

ok............

 

[priti]

... so now you dont know? the mothers of many mughal kings were HINDUS ! the so called protectors of your faith were the first ones to bow and presented their daughters ... and today their children consider others inferior?

yes they are inferior. those children are you guys.
the billion people who are hindus are the true heroes.

 

[SURYA-1]

So these rulers had Hindu blood in their veins.

It was probably mazboori. But far better than completely surrender their faith and convert to an alien ideology that just doesn't belong to this civilized land.

And he himself carries those genes of converted hindus.
So basically it was their forefathers who scummbed to faith from far of Arabian desert.

 

[Pakistanisage]

I floated this idea last year sometime but did not find much support except from @kalumiah. I think eventually this will happen for those ten countries which have contiguous land mass and are Muslim nations ( Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan and 6 former Soviet republics).

But we may have to start small as an Economic Block before a Federation is formed. Remember, it took European Union almost half a Century to materialize.

 

[Vinod2070]

Same BS... what did she state in the court ?

Same like what you are saying here about Sufis etc.

Doesn't change the facts.

Unlike indian forces we dont lie abt stats... and the deployments of PA in 71 are proven.... even ur general jacob gave a ratio of 1:50...

May be in specific sectors.

Anyway it was your foolishness to think that "the defense of the East lay in the West".

Dhaka fell when we had a fraction of troops on the ground compared to PA.

Anyway, don't get distracted. Check on this number of 93000 PA surrenders on your own.

There were no civilians in that number.

 

[priti]

ok guys face it.. for the arabs pakistan india and bd are just cheap labour.
India realises this because its a secular country. pakistan thinks they have a speacial alag thing going with arabs on account of islam and hence supports all kinds of teror activities etc.
Pak should realise its good future lies with cooperation with india and not CAR/arabia.
thats beause all musims countries talk islamic brotherhood but those who practise islamic brotherhood are basket cases, like egypt, pak, afg etc

 

[ThePrimeMinister]

ok guys face it.. for the arabs pakistan india and bd are just cheap labour.
India realises this because its a secular country. pakistan thinks they have a speacial alag thing going with arabs on account of islam and hence supports all kinds of teror activities etc.
Pak should realise its good future lies with cooperation with india and not CAR/arabia.
thats beause all musims countries talk islamic brotherhood but those who practise islamic brotherhood are basket cases, like egypt, pak, afg etc

I agree about the Arab view for Pakistan, but I think that's not the case with central Asian countries such as Turkey, which is why I'm not proposing a unification with the Arab league.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

yes they are inferior. those children are you guys.
the billion people who are hindus are the true heroes.

The children of mughals yes... coz they had muslim fathers... unlike u people who gave their women to mughals and talk abt ur loyality to ur religion.. funny isnt it?

So these rulers had Hindu blood in their veins.

It was probably mazboori. But far better than completely surrender their faith and convert to an alien ideology that just doesn't belong to this civilized land.

Please tell us how "hindu blood" looks likes...


As for "majboori" im sure the muslims of our region of were mostly large land owners never had any majboori... there were even several kings who became muslim ... without any majboori..

Same like what you are saying here about Sufis etc.

Doesn't change the facts.

Not really my friend... read about saints like waris shah,bullay shah,Shah lateef bithai,Shah rukn e alam etc... even ur dharmic sikhism has copied alot from these saints.

May be in specific sectors.

Anyway it was your foolishness to thing that "the defense of the East lay in the West".

Dhaka fell when we had a fraction of troops on the ground compared to PA.

Anyway, don't get distracted. Check on this number of 93000 PA surrenders on your own.

There were no civilians in that number.

Lol... so now Jacobs ratio became specified to some sectors? isnt it an open fact tht those men fought a much bigger enemy tht included bengalis asweel? as for 93000 again i have solid proof in the shape of the deployment of PA during 71... and u have speculations and bs?

And he himself carries those genes of converted hindus.
So basically it was their forefathers who scummbed to faith from far of Arabian desert.

Im sorry ... but my ancestors werent pagans..

 

[priti]

The children of mughals yes... coz they had muslim fathers... unlike u people who gave their women to mughals and talk abt ur loyality to ur religion.. funny isnt it?

..

so now you are saying that "they" are children of mughal. next time stop saying that 'we' ruled you for 1000 years. also hindus were broad minded about inter religion marriages and still are. but islam is so narrow minded that they cant marry outside their religion.
by the way the mughals wre stripped and shot dead . end of timurlane and baburs genes.
honourless people who converted to weird alien religions are inferior.

 

[scorpionx]

UN's definition of zones is considered invalid for many purposes where the US/USSR's definition prevails according to their FP, area of influence, economic activity and cultural linkages.

This is not by any means US/USSR definition about world grouping.Regional aggregation has been done for statistical analysis and it is not based on cultural/religious synchronism. Country terminology is codified by UN terminology division based on the decisions of Inter governmental bodies.
As you said,if cultural/religious factors are to be taken into account for regional groupings, ambiguities will be enormous to handle.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

so now you are saying that "they" are children of mughal. next time stop saying that 'we' ruled you for 1000 years.
by the way the mughals wre stripped and shot dead . end of timurlane and baburs genes.
honourless people who converted to weird alien religions are inferior.

You should watch your bloody mouth... and look at your hindu practises..... and yes mughals are still alive ... we have a few on PDF aswell... what about ur ancestors who use to give their women to mughals?

 

[priti]

I agree about the Arab view for Pakistan, but I think that's not the case with central Asian countries such as Turkey, which is why I'm not proposing a unification with the Arab league.

turkey is desperately trying to enter EU and dont want to associate with CAR , in my opiinon.

 

[Vinod2070]

The children of mughals yes... coz they had muslim fathers... unlike u people who gave their women to mughals and talk abt ur loyality to ur religion.. funny isnt it?

So all of you are children of Mughals?

May be. You don't understand the implications well enough probably.

Please tell us how "hindu blood" looks likes...

If their mother was Hindu, the progeny has Hindu blood in his vains.

May be in some cultures, mothers don't matter?

As for "majboori" im sure the muslims of our region of were mostly large land owners never had any majboori... there were even several kings who became muslim ... without any majboori..

The large majority of converts were poor, low caste and timid people.

You are wrong about "muslims of your region". They were the first to surrender and convert.

They either had no choice or no courage just like many others to their West who lost their glorious culture and civilization.

Forever.

Not really my friend... read about saints like waris shah,bullay shah,Shah lateef bithai,Shah rukn e alam etc... even ur dharmic sikhism has copied alot from these saints.

Your heroes are all people who perpetrated rapine and genocide on your ancestors.

Most of these people would have been blown up today like their graves and followers are being blown today in Pakistan.

They would be called Munafiqs and heretics. Using haraam stuff like music!

Lol... so now Jacobs ratio became specified to some sectors? isnt it an open fact tht those men fought a much bigger enemy tht included bengalis asweel? as for 93000 again i have solid proof in the shape of the deployment of PA during 71... and u have speculations and bs?

Do you know what 1:50 means!

Indian army overall has a ratio of less than 1:2 with PA (1 million Vs 650,000). How can there be 1:50 ratio unless PA refuses to fight.

Yes, you had the disastrous and pathetic "East will be defended in the West" but still genocide of 3 million needed those 93,000 who surrendered in double quick time.

Im sorry ... but my ancestors werent pagans..

It is always so funny when converts use these funny words.