What's new

A step in the wrong direction

Bussard Ramjet

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 10, 2014
Messages
3,978
Reaction score
2
Country
India
Location
India
Chinese newspaper editor sacked for criticising Beijing's 'war on terror' | World news | The Guardian


Chinese newspaper editor sacked for criticising Beijing's 'war on terror'
Zhao Xinwei was removed from the state-run Xinjiang Daily for ‘improperly’ discussing government policy in China’s violence-stricken western region



Chinese flags in the western region of Xinjiang, where the editor of the state-run newspaper has been sacked for “improperly” discussing Beijing’s policies in the violence stricken area.
Photograph: Tom Phillips for the Guardian
Tom Phillips


A Chinese newspaper editor has been sacked for criticising Beijing’s controversial war on terror following the introduction of draconian new rules that outlaw any criticism of Communist party policy.

Zhao Xinwei, the editor of the state-run Xinjiang Daily newspaper, was removed from his job and expelled from the party after an investigation found him guilty of “improperly” discussing, and publicly opposing, government policy in China’s violence-stricken west.


The former editor’s “words and deeds” had gone against government attempts to rein in religious extremism and terrorism, the official China News Service agency reported on Monday.

In Xinjiang, a sprawling region of west China where Beijing is grappling with what some describe as a low-level insurgency against Communist party rule, the crackdown on dissent has been particularly intense.

Zhao, who joined the party in 1984 and became the newspaper’s editor in 2011, had also been caught accepting bribes, wasting public money and “turning a deaf ear to wrongdoing” in his organisation, the report added.

Zhao’s removal from the job and the Communist party comes just over a week after Beijing unveiled harsh new rules banning party members from “making groundless comments on national policies”.

Those who “irresponsibly make comments about national policies” or who “defame the nation, the Party and State leaders or distort the history of the nation and the Party” will be punished, the state-controlled Global Times tabloid newspaper reported.

“Party members who take the liberty to decide or publicly comment on issues that they have no place to, such as issues that should be decided by the CPC [Communist Party of China] Central Committee, will also be subject to punishment,” it added.

Beijing has shown an increasing intolerance for dissent since Xi Jinping – a man some call China’s most powerful leader since Mao - became Communist party chief in November 2012.

Advertisement
 
.
.
@ChineseTiger1986

Why shouldn't policy be debated openly so that there can be better feedback?

China's many policies in Xinjiang are indeed not working, as can be seen in increasing violence. Putting pressure on a group of people to give up their beliefs, and to discriminate against them, only radicalizes them, and doesn't improve anything.

@Edison Chen @Chinese Bamboo @Chinese-Dragon @cnleio @cirr @tranquilium @FairAndUnbiased @Beast
Maybe you should apply that "morally correct" policy in Kashmir first. In short all countries stifle dissent in one way or the other. How many times has Gillani been locked up in his home or arrested? Our morality is always demanding us to confront other countries but many do the same in our own countries. Practice what you preech.
 
.
Is he a terrorists sympathizer? If yes, nice move.

@ChineseTiger1986

Why shouldn't policy be debated openly so that there can be better feedback?

China's many policies in Xinjiang are indeed not working, as can be seen in increasing violence. Putting pressure on a group of people to give up their beliefs, and to discriminate against them, only radicalizes them, and doesn't improve anything.

@Edison Chen @Chinese Bamboo @Chinese-Dragon @cnleio @cirr @tranquilium @FairAndUnbiased @Beast
Please show me an example. Which country had eliminated terrorism by giving terrorists more freedom? All we have are contrary cases. Such as in Chechnya, in Iraq, in Syria.
 
.
Is he a terrorists sympathizer? If yes, nice move.

All Uygurs are not terrorists.

There are inhumane policies in Xinjiang, that are too intrusive, everything from, the shape and size of beard, to drinking etc.

Is he a terrorists sympathizer? If yes, nice move.


Please show me an example. Which country had eliminated terrorism by giving terrorists more freedom? All we have are contrary cases. Such as in Chechnya, in Iraq, in Syria.

Muslims are not terrorists.

I agree, don't give any freedom or mercy to terrorists. But what he is talking about is the policy regarding a whole population.

India has 200 million Muslims, and if we were any where near as harsh as China is in Xinjiang, India would have blown up literally.

Maybe you should apply that "morally correct" policy in Kashmir first. In short all countries stifle dissent in one way or the other. How many times has Gillani been locked up in his home or arrested? Our morality is always demanding us to confront other countries but many do the same in our own countries. Practice what you preech.

We have no where near the harsh policies that China has in Xinjiang.

In India muslims can basically do anything as they please. Muslim marriages are governed by Muslim marriage law, polygamy is allowed, and there is no restriction on Mosques.
 
.
All Uygurs are not terrorists.

There are inhumane policies in Xinjiang, that are too intrusive, everything from, the shape and size of beard, to drinking etc.



Muslims are not terrorists.

I agree, don't give any freedom or mercy to terrorists. But what he is talking about is the policy regarding a whole population.

India has 200 million Muslims, and if we were any where near as harsh as China is in Xinjiang, India would have blown up literally.
I have heard too many bullshits like xxx are not all terrorists. That's the philosophy which offers terrorists haven and encourages terrorists to be fearless. It's a bullshit that sounds kind but actually hurts more innocent people.
 
.
All Uygurs are not terrorists.

There are inhumane policies in Xinjiang, that are too intrusive, everything from, the shape and size of beard, to drinking etc.



Muslims are not terrorists.

I agree, don't give any freedom or mercy to terrorists. But what he is talking about is the policy regarding a whole population.

India has 200 million Muslims, and if we were any where near as harsh as China is in Xinjiang, India would have blown up literally.



We have no where near the harsh policies that China has in Xinjiang.

In India muslims can basically do anything as they please. Muslim marriages are governed by Muslim marriage law, polygamy is allowed, and there is no restriction on Mosques.
Then why was Afzal Guru hanged, beef ban imposed in a majority muslim state, Hurriyat leaders arrested, Modi who killed muslims a PM? Before criticizing China fix India. China may be harsh on muslims but it is also harsh on all religious groups and treats all equally. There is no differential treatment for people. The Hui muslims particularly are extremely loyal to China.

In India a man like Tanda who did nothing is arrested and Babu Bajrangi given a job in intelligence
 
.
I have heard too many bullshits like xxx are not all terrorists. That's the philosophy which offers terrorists haven and encourages terrorists to be fearless. It's a bullshit that sounds kind but actually hurts more innocent people.

So you mean to suggest that all Uygurs are terrorists?
 
.
@ChineseTiger1986

Why shouldn't policy be debated openly so that there can be better feedback?

China's many policies in Xinjiang are indeed not working, as can be seen in increasing violence. Putting pressure on a group of people to give up their beliefs, and to discriminate against them, only radicalizes them, and doesn't improve anything.

@Edison Chen @Chinese Bamboo @Chinese-Dragon @cnleio @cirr @tranquilium @FairAndUnbiased @Beast
Your comment precisely makes CCP action justify.

They are simply too many ignorant people like you duped by fakes news of China suppressing Islam and Uyghur culture that causes the unrest. Many uyghur are poison by extremist spread by middle east and turkish. Why the Hui muslim in China has no revolt against CCP? Can you tell me why?

The Western Europe and USA is so liberate and yet many of their citizen joined ISIS. Does that means US and Europe are suppressing Islam and their culture that force them turning to ISIS?
 
.
So you mean to suggest that all Uygurs are terrorists?
As Putin says: If you dress like terrorist, act like terrorist. You are a terrorist. We don't have problem with Uygurs like this:
u=3606560767,3934858198&fm=23&gp=0.jpg
 
.
Your comment precisely makes CCP action justify.

They are simply too many ignorant people like you duped by fakes news of China suppressing Islam and Uyghur culture that causes the unrest. Many uyghur are poison by extremist spread by middle east and turkish. Why the Hui muslim in China has no revolt against CCP? Can you tell me why?

The Western Europe and USA is so liberate and yet many of their citizen joined ISIS. Does that means US and Europe are suppressing Islam and their culture that force them turning to ISIS?

The last time that happened it resulted in "1000 Huis lay dead with 4,400 houses destroyed. The PLA used guns, cannons and also aerial bombardment in the campaign"

Shadian incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
. . . .
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom