A new secret underground nuclear site under construction in Iran?

[Major Shaitan Singh]

The NCRI said the site was located in a complex of tunnels beneath mountains 10 km (6 miles) east of the town of Damavand, itself about 50 km northeast of Tehran. Construction of the site's first phase began in 2006 and was recently completed, it said.

The group released satellite photographs of what it said was the site. But the images did not appear to constitute hard evidence to support the assertion that it was a planned nuclear facility.
A spokesman for the dissidents said he could not say what sort of nuclear work would be conducted there, but that the companies and people involved showed it was a nuclear site. The group named officials it said were in charge of the project.
"The site consists of four tunnels and has been constructed by a group of engineering and construction companies associated with the engineering arms of the Ministry of Defence and the IRGC (Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards force)," the NCRI said.

And you may also look on Google Earth at coordinates: 35 40 40 N, 52 08 50 E

Most recent Google pictures are from 2011 but clearly someone's busy there digging into the mountain (wide, reinforced tunnel entrances are clearly visible). There's a fenced area and what looks furiously like an AD site.

http://www.xn--ruters-ic1c.com/article/2013/07/11/us-nuclear-iran-exiles-idUSBRE96A06520130711

 

[Sam1980]

They're most probably trolling!

 

[Serpentine]

Seriously, another bs from a terrorist group?
Please, at least look at the source before posting it.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Another claim from those terrorists.
The last time they gave W.C. address to the west inside parchin facility , that was hilarious.

 

[Surenas]

Seriously, another bs from a terrorist group?
Please, at least look at the source before posting it.

We could disagree with the group's historical and political actions, but as far as I know they have been right before about some nuclear revelations.

 

[Hack-Hook]

We could disagree with the group's historical and political actions, but as far as I know they have been right before about some nuclear revelations.

Only about natanz and were wrong about anything else.

And abiut their history there is no doubt they are terrorist who targetted iranuan civilian , Iraqi civillian and kurds . What else is more to say about them .

 

[Surenas]

Only about natanz and were wrong about anything else.

Natanz indeed shows that they have their sources and intelligence within Iran's state establishment.

And abiut their history there is no doubt they are terrorist who targetted iranuan civilian , Iraqi civillian and kurds . What else is more to say about them .

That they are in the same category as the Iranian regime, who have been responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of political activists. They both represent an outdated ideology which shouldn't have a place in the Iranian society in the 21st century.

 

[Serpentine]

We could disagree with the group's historical and political actions, but as far as I know they have been right before about some nuclear revelations.

They 'revealed' Natanz like few months before Iran officially declares it to IAEA. Nothing breathtaking.Iran was going to show it to IAEA inspectors after completion of first phase, they just succeeded in starting a psychological war.
Anyway, they are hated by 99.99% Iranians, whether they are pro regime or against it.

 

[Surenas]

Anyway, they hare hated by 99.99% Iranians, whether they are pro regime or against it.

They are not really popular anymore in Iran, but 99.99% seem to be exaggerated. Remember that this was the same party which was supported by a significant amount of Iranians during the revolution. The only difference is that they lost, and the mullahs won.

Supporting Saddam has been their biggest strategical mistake ever, and I can't see how they could make it up with the Iranian people. They look 'modern' from the outside, but still have that pseudo-authoritarian rule, hierarchical organizational structure and backward segregated policies (women and men separated).

Anyway, they have no future in Iran, just like the mullah's haven't when they are gone.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Natanz indeed shows that they have their sources and intelligence within Iran's state establishment.



That they are in the same category as the Iranian regime, who have been responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of political activists. They both represent an outdated ideology which shouldn't have a place in the Iranian society in the 21st century.

Only they attavked prople who had nothing to do with politic or military or anything else