A new generation takes up arms in Kashmir

[El Sidd]

Anne frank in this case will be hindu kashmiri pandit whose family was eliminated in a genocide

Anne Frank was a human.

Kashmir is a human conflict.

For you if it is. Declare your Version Hindu jihad on Islam.

We shall dine gloriously sorrounded by the Andes

 

[jetray]

Anne Frank was a human.

Kashmir is a human conflict.

For you if it is. Declare your Version Hindu jihad on Islam.

We shall dine gloriously sorrounded by the Andes

Hinduism is neither a religion nor any one can speak or do things on its behalf. If that was the case hundreds of temples would not been destroyed or ppl killed through the ages.

 

[M. Sarmad]

It is 95% bcos of centuries of oppression & forcible conversion on local hindu pandits. Now most of the kashmiri pandits are living in refugee camps in their own country.

Kashmir belongs to Kashmiri Pandits as well ... They have same rights as any other Kashmiri ... As for what supposedly happened a thousand or ten thousand years ago is irrelevant. British India was divided on the basis of 1941 census. In 1947, over half a million Muslims were either expelled from or killed in Jammu to make Jammu a Hindu/Sikh majority division. Talk about oppression and forced migrations ?

Bangladesh was also Muslim and quit Pakistan....

But never joined India ! ...

 

[El Sidd]

Hinduism is neither a religion nor any one can speak or do things on its behalf. If that was the case hundreds of temples would not been destroyed or ppl killed through the ages.

I am Not here to discuss Religion.

 

[jetray]

Kashmir belongs to Kashmiri Pandits as well ... They have same rights as any other Kashmiri ... As for what supposedly happened a thousand or ten thousand years ago is irrelevant. British India was divided on the basis of 1941 census. In 1947, over half a million Muslims were either expelled from or killed in Jammu to make Jammu a Hindu/Sikh majority division. Talk about oppression and forced migrations ?

Should we forgive you bcos it took place in the past? Tell me one good reason why we should not do the same thing on you ppl that you ppl did/doing against pandits?

This crap is routinely sold every where to fool ppl. Sell them to pandits and you will get shot in your ***. The fact is that it is still very much taking place and fundamentalists in the valley want to impose nizam-e-mustafa.

I am Not here to discuss Religion.

good stop discussing kashmir then.

 

[oOo]

Neither Afghanistan, Nor Arabia were part of British India ... What are you on about ?

That India never endorsed the thought that muslims can not live in harmony with majority India. We were open to areas with 100% muslim populations, valley was just 95%.

We are/were not promoter of your two nation theory. And your opinion does not count on us and neither on Indian Independence Act.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Should we forgive you bcos it took place in the past? Tell me one good reason why we should not do the same thing on you ppl that you ppl did/doing against pandits?
.

What happened to Kashmiri Pandits in 1990s was done to Jammu Muslims in 1947, but on a much larger scale ... You guys are not as innocent as you pretend to be ... And why would someone seek forgiveness for something allegedly done by some unknown persons a thousand years ago ??

 

[oOo]

so is Iran.

By their two nation theory, the world must have 4-5 countries only, based on religions.

Its hard for them to even think of how can muslims live with majority of hindus.

 

[jetray]

By their two nation theory, the world must have 4-5 countries only, based on religions.

Its hard for them to even think of how can muslims live with majority of hindus.

not 4 or 5 only one ummah.

 

[oOo]

not 4 or 5 only one ummah.

That would be the ultimate goal of one of those 4-5.

 

[MultaniGuy]

Y

It is 95% bcos of centuries of oppression & forcible conversion on local hindu pandits. Now most of the kashmiri pandits are living in refugee camps in their own country.

You are wrong. Those Hindus converted to Islam by their own free will.
\
Don't use the forceful conversion argument, because in Islam forced conversions are forbidden.

 

[M. Sarmad]

That India never endorsed the thought that muslims can not live in harmony with majority India. We were open to areas with 100% muslim populations, valley was just 95%.

We are/were not promoter of your two nation theory. And your opinion does not count on us and neither on Indian Independence Act.

If that were the case, then why did Congress accept the partition plan proposed by Mountbatten on 3rd June 1947 and the Indian Independence Act 1947 ?? You should have rejected it ......

 

[jetray]

Y

You are wrong. Those Hindus converted to Islam by their own free will.
\
Don't use the forceful conversion argument, because in Islam forced conversions are forbidden.

Not every one converted on their free will and history is a testament things took place or happening. Any one denying forceful conversions just have ulterior motives. There are lot many things which are forbidden but regularly take place like for suicide bombings or violence in religious places or destruction of others religious places.

 

[MultaniGuy]

Not every one converted on their free will and history is a testament things took place or happening. Any one denying forceful conversions just have ulterior motives. There are lot many things which are forbidden but regularly take place like for suicide bombings or violence in religious places.

Actually it is you who has ulterior motives.

All Muslims know forced conversions in Islam are absolutely forbidden. Islam is all about winning the hearts and the minds of the people.

Show me proof that Muslim scholars forcibly converted someone to Islam?

Its just hard for you to swallow that someone would convert to Islam out of their free will.

 

[oOo]

If that was the case, then why did the Congress accept the partition plan proposed by Mountbatten on 3rd June 1947 and the Indian Independence Act 1947 ?? You should have rejected it ......

Who were we?

Those who think they can not co-exist were given choice to leave the united India, rest were allowed to stay back. Why not Jinnah succeeded in making population count the deciding factor for partition? Why leave it for prince to decide?

We accepted the IIA 47 as it was as per our ideology.