A mosque in Kekirawa demolished by Sri Lankan Muslims

[Zhukov]

NTJ mosque in Kekirawa demolished by Muslims

A mosque used by the National Thawheed Jama'at (NTJ) at Madatugama in Kekirawa was yesterday demolished by the area Muslims and devotees of the main mosque.

Trustee of the main mosque M.H.M. Akbar Khan said the mosque used by the NTJ was built with the funds of an organization based in a foreign country.

He said they had decided to demolish the mosque considering the current situation in the country and said there was no need of two mosques. (Kanchana Kumara Ariyadasa)

http://www.dailymirror.lk/breaking_news/NTJ-mosque-in-Kekirawa-demolished-by-Muslims/108-168204

Is National Tawheed Jamaat is related to recent blasts? Why demolishing Mosque specific to this sect. Relations with Extremists or a political stunt show? Please Elaborate

 

[Max]

Shameful, They are doing this under buddhist state sponsored threats and oppression, Muslims could have easily arranged a new management from other organization which Sri Lankan Govt trust, but they opted to destroy mosque by themselves instead of finding a suitable management.

sounds too convenient..

 

[jamahir]

Is National Tawheed Jamaat is related to recent blasts?

Yes.

These are pathetic houseboys not muslims, no honurable muslim would ever demolish a mosque

Muslims could have easily arranged a new management from other organization which Sri Lankan Govt trust, but they opted to destroy mosque by themselves instead of finding a suitable management.

sounds too convenient..

He said they had decided to demolish the mosque considering the current situation in the country

1. Probably the Muslims of that area did not want a permanent reminder of the NTJ.

and said there was no need of two mosques.

2. See ?? Why two mosques in the same area ??

 

[-=virus=-]

Almost 300 people were murdered by members of an organization that used the mosque to spread their hateful ideology.

Good to see the muslim community take responsibility, own up, and at least making a big symbolic gesture by taking that mosque down and distancing themselves from the NTJ.

 

[Max]

1. Probably the Muslims of that area did not want a permanent reminder of the NTJ.

This could have been done without destroying mosque i,e change in management.

2. See ?? Why two mosques in the same area ??

Maybe Pakistani Govt should also ask buddhist to destroy their old buddha carvings bcoz they are more then 1 in some areas.

as far as two mosques are concern, well bcoz of sectarian divide, Wahhabi, Sunni, Shia, Ahle Hadees operate their own mosques in same town. This BS logic cannot justify destruction of mosque, its pure oppression.

 

[PakSword]

Control of the mosque could have been easily transferred to a government favorite moderate Islamic organization.. but since some people have to show holier than thou attitude, the mosque was destroyed.. facepalm..

 

[Pakhtoon yum]

So now Sri Lankan Muslims need to prove their allegiance to the country? Just because of the doings of a few people who dont even "represent" their faith?

Where are the Islamic originations that are controlled by the Saud family? The oic the blah blah blah

 

[jamahir]

This could have been done without destroying mosque i,e change in management.

Control of the mosque could have been easily transferred to a government favorite moderate Islamic organization

I think you are correct.

But the fact remains that a mosque is not of utmost importance in Islam, unlike a temple is in Hinduism.

I have seen some people use "House of God" to denote a mosque. It is wrong because such a statement would denote idolatry.

Also, understanding this would lead to resolution of the Babri Masjid controversy in India.

Where are the Islamic originations that are controlled by the Saud family? The oic the blah blah blah

**Self-delete**

So now Sri Lankan Muslims need to prove their allegiance to the country? Just because of the doings of a few people who dont even "represent" their faith?

But the "others" need to speak out and be heard, saying that groups like al Qaeda, the Tableeghi Jamaat and the Muslim Brotherhood do not represent their faith.

 

[StandForInsaf]

I think breaking someone else property is illegal everywhere in world, whatever it is mosque temple or shrine.

I think you are correct.

But the fact remains that a mosque is not of utmost importance in Islam, unlike a temple is in Hinduism.

I have seen some people use "House of God" to denote a mosque. It is wrong because such a statement would denote idolatry.

Also, understanding this would lead to resolution of the Babri Masjid controversy in India.



The OIC is a tool of the Western governments.



But the "others" need to speak out and be heard, saying that groups like al Qaeda, the Tableeghi Jamaat and the Muslim Brotherhood do not represent their faith.

Tableeghi jamaat is non violent non political pure religious organization how can you compare it with al qaeda ?

 

[Surya 1]

So now Sri Lankan Muslims need to prove their allegiance to the country? Just because of the doings of a few people who dont even "represent" their faith?

It happens you know. Like 300 people gave their life for doing of one man who did not represent their faith.

Thanks god that No Muslims are killed for revenge.

Some Muslims are fighting back against Islamic extremists.

There are many such brave Muslims. They will fight back where they have the freedom to fight back.

 

[jamahir]

Tableeghi jamaat is non violent non political pure religious organization how can you compare it with al qaeda ?

At best the TJ groups are irritations. At worst they are stepping stones to joining foreign and transnational terror groups like al Qaeda, FSA, the Brotherhood, Abu Sayyaf etc.

Finally, the true representatives of Islam would be the various Muslim-containing socialist movements across the world.

I think breaking someone else property is illegal everywhere in world, whatever it is mosque temple or shrine.

But the owner of that property is a banned, terror organisation.

 

[Dubious]

Where are the Islamic originations that are controlled by the Saud family? The oic the blah blah blah

Very unrelated! Are you trolling?

But the "others" need to speak out and be heard, saying that groups like al Qaeda, the Tableeghi Jamaat and the Muslim Brotherhood do not represent their faith.

Glad you brought this forward! We have been screaming but deaf people cant hear!

https://muslimscondemn.com/

the Tableeghi Jamaat

Are you trolling? or do you beg for a ban?

It happens you know. Like 300 people gave their life for doing of one man who did not represent their faith.

Thanks god that No Muslims are killed for revenge.

Should I bring your attention to Gujrat riots? Revenge? Every Muslim killed (Kashmiri) or attacked (for eating beef) for breathing as a Muslim seems like revenge from a revengeful india!

 

[Surya 1]

Very unrelated! Are you trolling?


Glad you brought this forward! We have been screaming but deaf people cant hear!

https://muslimscondemn.com/


Are you trolling? or do you beg for a ban?


Should I bring your attention to Gujrat riots? Revenge? Every Muslim killed (Kashmiri) or attacked (for eating beef) for breathing as a Muslim seems like revenge from a revengeful india!

Revenge is a reaction. Muslims think that they have the licence to kill and if reaction comes, it is revengeful.

 

[Dubious]

At best the TJ groups are irritations. At worst they are stepping stones to joining foreign and transnational terror groups like al Qaeda, FSA, the Brotherhood, Abu Sayyaf etc.

Ok I will stop you right there...THIS is pure misinformation , trolling and derailing!

owner of that property is a banned, terror organisation.

Yea so they couldnt use the masjid for any other purpose at all? NICE lesson to the next generation ...plant the seeds of mob violence

Revenge is a reaction. Muslims think that they have the licence to kill and if reaction comes, it is revengeful.

Stop trolling!

 

[HannibalBarca]

So what should the Sri Lankan Muslims do ??

What should they do... Well Europe asked the same... and the answer is the same... Follow what is right and speak out about the khwarji among them AND defend themselves with words their stance when they are attacked And take refuge with Allah.

But nothing more than that... since it's the state that should speak up... The state has the obligation to protect her minorities... and the state has the duty to say to it's citizen that such groups do not represent that same minority and that any attack/retaliation on that minority WILL be dealt with justice...

If a state can't do it... it's literally a failed state... As long as a state can't protect what is weaker ... He will NEVER be able to protect the strong in due time...And a State who can't keep his stance and kneel to pressure in front of what is right... Then it's not a state anymore... just a group of retards... that will wait the next retard to hold the position and so on... till they hold their balls or just disappear like others before them...

And the last chapter... if the State can't guarantee the safety of that minority... and Those Muslims keep getting persecuted and driven out of their homes as a ''Systematic'' way... Then no one should get surprised if they use violence to defend themselves AND no ONE, whatever it's a Muslim or not... have anything to say about it... Like we see when they criticize Some Groups of Muslims taking the Gun/use violence to fight in certain part of the World, aka Palestine; Syria; Kashmir etc...

Words have a limit when Death is given to you as an Alternative...