What's new

A Modest Proposal From a Pakistani Brigadier

Status
Not open for further replies.

jha

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
10,962
Reaction score
-8
Country
India
Location
India
What one prominent Pakistani thinks his country should do with its atomic weapons

In the center of the biggest traffic circle of every major city in Pakistan sits a craggy, Gibraltarish replica of a nameless peak in the Chagai range. This mountain is the home of Pakistan's nuclear test site. The development, in 1998, of the "Islamic Bomb," intended as a counter to India's nuclear capability, is Pakistan's only celebrated achievement since its formation, in 1947. The mountain replicas, about three stories tall, are surrounded by flower beds that are lovingly weeded, watered, and manicured. At dusk, when the streetlights come on, so do the mountains, glowing a weird molten yellow.

Islamabad's monument to the atomic bomb occupies a rotary between the airport and the city center. Nearby stand models of Pakistan's two classes of missile: Shaheen and Ghauri. The Islamabad nuclear shrine stands at a place where the city is dissolving into an incoherent edge town of shabby strip malls and empty boulevards and rows of desolate government buildings. A little farther in one comes to the gridded blocks of gated homes. The neighborhoods are called sectors. The streets are numbered, not named.

Late last year, after nearly two months in Pakistan, I paid the last of many visits to house No. 8 on street 19, sector F-8/2, a modern white mansion known as Zardari House. The house has been used by Asif Ali Zardari, the imprisoned husband of Benazir Bhutto, Pakistan's exiled former Prime Minister. Neither Zardari nor Bhutto has been there for a long time. Zardari has been confined for five years, most recently in Attock Fort, a medieval fortress perched over the Indus River between Islamabad and Peshawar. He is charged with a slew of crimes: large-scale corruption; conspiracy in the murder of Bhutto's brother Mir Murtaza; conspiracy to smuggle narcotics. Bhutto, who also faces corruption charges in Pakistan, lives in Dubai with their three children. Pakistan's leader, General Pervez Musharraf, has promised to have her arrested and tried if she ever returns to Pakistan. Outside the gate to the empty Zardari House sits a man with his back to the wall, a sawed-off shotgun across his knees.

I had been going there to consult with Brigadier Amanullah, known to his friends as Aman. Aman, in his early fifties and now retired, is lithe and gentle-natured and seemed to me slightly depressed. He works in a small office behind Zardari House, where, as the secretary to Benazir Bhutto in Islamabad, he coordinates Bhutto's efforts to return to Pakistan and regain its prime ministership. He also keeps in close touch with old colleagues, who include many powerful people in Pakistan. Aman was once the chief of Pakistan's military intelligence in Sind Province, which borders India. Pakistan's biggest city and a cultural center, Karachi, is in Sind. That put Aman squarely in the middle of things, his finger near many sorts of buttons. Today Aman is believed to act as Bhutto's liaison with the armed forces, and he maintains contacts with serving army officers, including senior generals. When I wanted to speak to someone in the Pakistani government, I asked Aman. When I wanted to speak to someone in the Taliban, or in military intelligence, or in the political opposition, I asked Aman. His replies were mumbled and monosyllabic. He never offered opinions. He would simply hear me out and, most times, tip his head and say, "Why not?" Within an hour after Aman and I parted, I would receive a phone call from his secretary. References would be made to "that man" or "that matter," and I would be given a phone number and a time to call. Having spoken with Aman, I was always expected.

On the day of my final visit Aman seemed more sullen than usual. He ushered me into a room adjoining the office. The room was long and spare. There was an oil painting on the far wall. The other walls were empty and lined with cushioned chairs. Aman sat across from me. We had tea and spoke about the latest events.

As we were wrapping up our conversation, I looked at the oil painting. It was a strange picture, a horizontal landscape about four feet across, with overtones of socialist realism. In the foreground a youthful Benazir Bhutto stood in heroic pose on an escarpment overlooking the featureless grid of Islamabad. Beside her stood her father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, a Prime Minister who in 1977 was ousted in a coup and two years later hanged. On the other side of Bhutto was Mohammed Ali Jinnah, the long-dead founding father of Pakistan. Their postures were exalted, their expressions a combination of pride and awe. Jinnah's arm pointed to the vast plain beyond the city, where a rocket was lifting out of billowing clouds of vapor and fire into the sky.

Aman noticed me looking at the painting and followed my gaze. I asked him if Benazir Bhutto had commissioned it, and Aman said no. He told me that one day when she was still Prime Minister, an unknown man, an ordinary Pakistani citizen, had come to the gate of Zardari House with the picture and told Aman that he'd painted it for the Prime Minister and wanted to present it to her as a gift. Aman said that he was immediately transfixed by the painting. He called to Bhutto inside the house, but she refused to come down to see the man. Aman was persistent, and eventually she came down.

"I insisted Benazir accept it as a gift," Aman told me.

We both looked up at the painting in silence. "A rocket ship heading to the moon?" I asked.

Aman tipped his head to the side. A smirk tugged at the corners of his mouth. "No," he said. "A nuclear warhead heading to India."


I thought he was making a joke. Then I saw he wasn't. I thought of the shrines to Pakistan's nuclear-weapons site, prominently displayed in every city. I told Aman that I was disturbed by the ease with which Pakistanis talk of nuclear war with India.

Aman shook his head. "No," he said matter-of-factly. "This should happen. We should use the bomb."

"For what purpose?" He didn't seem to understand my question. "In retaliation?" I asked.

"Why not?"

"Or first strike?"

"Why not?"

I looked for a sign of irony. None was visible.
Rocking his head side to side, his expression becoming more and more withdrawn, Aman launched into a monologue that neither of us, I am sure, knew was coming:

"We should fire at them and take out a few of their cities—Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta," he said. "They should fire back and take Karachi and Lahore. Kill off a hundred or two hundred million people. They should fire at us and it would all be over. They have acted so badly toward us; they have been so mean. We should teach them a lesson. It would teach all of us a lesson. There is no future here, and we need to start over. So many people think this. Have you been to the villages of Pakistan, the interior? There is nothing but dire poverty and pain. The children have no education; there is nothing to look forward to. Go into the villages, see the poverty. There is no drinking water. Small children without shoes walk miles for a drink of water. I go to the villages and I want to cry. My children have no future. None of the children of Pakistan have a future. We are surrounded by nothing but war and suffering. Millions should die away."

"Pakistan should fire pre-emptively?" I asked.

Aman nodded.

"And you are willing to see your children die?"

"Tens of thousands of people are dying in Kashmir, and the only superpower says nothing," Aman said. "America has sided with India because it has interests there." He told me he was willing to see his children be killed. He repeated that they didn't have any future—his children or any other children.

I asked him if he thought he was alone in his thoughts, and Aman made it clear to me that he was not.

"Believe me," he went on, "If I were in charge, I would have already done it."

Aman stopped, as though he'd stunned even himself. Then he added, with quiet forcefulness, "Before I die, I hope I should see it."

A Modest Proposal From the Brigadier - Magazine - The Atlantic
 
.
I hope the Americans and sane Pakistanis themselves continue to maintain a strict vigil in whatever way its possible on Pakistan's nukes and the ppl in Pakistan who would be responsible to authorize the launch of these weapons.

One mad person gets control and its gonna be ALL OVER.
 
.
This brigadier is an apt example of Bandar ke haath mein ustaraa

Dont worry.. You have idiots like this every where..
 
.
This quote speaks volumes:

There is no future here, and we need to start over. So many people think this. Have you been to the villages of Pakistan, the interior? There is nothing but dire poverty and pain. The children have no education; there is nothing to look forward to. Go into the villages, see the poverty. There is no drinking water. Small children without shoes walk miles for a drink of water. I go to the villages and I want to cry. My children have no future. None of the children of Pakistan have a future. We are surrounded by nothing but war and suffering.

The solution lies not in destroying everything, but massive social uplift programs.
 
.
This quote speaks volumes:

The solution lies not in destroying everything, but massive social uplift programs.


Social uplift?? What does that mean in milieu where Islam is supposed to be the answer to every problem??
What is social uplift without structural changes to the economy? How can it be sustained? How can value systems be changed when islam is the answer to every problem??


Awwal au Akhir - we are start with and end up with the root of the problem, Islamism.
 
.
Social uplift?? What does that mean in milieu where Islam is supposed to be the answer to every problem??
What is social uplift without structural changes to the economy? How can it be sustained? How can value systems be changed when islam is the answer to every problem??


Awwal au Akhir - we are start with and end up with the root of the problem, Islamism.


As much as I agree with you on many things, I would beg to differ here: Social uplift programs can be effective both with and without religion. Here, Islamism is NOT a problem.
 
.
Then help me understand - address the objections I have raised:

How can value systems be changed when the solution to every problem is more Islam?
How can social uplift programs be sustained without structural changes to the economy?
 
.
How can value systems be changed when the solution to every problem is more Islam?

Social uplift programs need no change in value systems. It does not matter to the neediest of people to question where help comes from: They will drink the clean water, and send their children to schools, if they are provided, and so on.

How can social uplift programs be sustained without structural changes to the economy?

The economy is a huge worry for me for sure. For getting the process started, enabling NGOs to start in designated areas will deliver needed uplift much more efficiently than the present governance structures.
 
.
The guys in charge are much smarter and well-qualified than most of us. They better understand the settings involved that demand the actual use of a nuke. Pakistan's nukes are a deterrent. They aren't meant to be used "For the Heck of it". They are meant to make India think twice before going to war with Pakistan which they have done beautifully in 1999 and 2002, some might say even 2008.
 
.
I had a different conception of social uplift program - what you describe is just charity to beggars - whereas I thought of social uplift programs as something that requires a "buy-in" from the recipients with regard to the changes they have to make in order to keep getting assistance.

V

I encourage you to look into this notion of the role of reordering the priority of values and it's connection with social change -- and of course the role of the incentive in a dynamic economy to the reordering of priority of values and it's relationship with social change.

A reordering in the priority assigned by individuals, to values, is key to social change - all of it enabled if the appropriate incentive is effected in a dynamic economy ----- Consider, the value assigned to obtaining an education and the lack of opportunities in the economy -- with a high degree of predictability, we can say that in that milieu, an educated individual is more likely to develop attitudes and justifications for an orientation that see moral benefit in political and economic ideas that are posited as "just", even if "socializing" --- consider the legitimacy of the political "awaam"

I think you will just enjoy looking into it --
 
.
I had a different conception of social uplift program - what you describe is just charity to beggars - whereas I thought of social uplift programs as something that requires a "buy-in" from the recipients with regard to the changes they have to make in order to keep getting assistance.

Social uplift is not charity. The basics: food, shelter, clothing, clean water, adequate food are UNIVERSAL and do not need any buy-in on their part. Meeting these basic creates the conditions where sustaining them naturally inclines a population to buy-in, as you put it.

I encourage you to look into this notion of the role of reordering the priority of values and it's connection with social change -- and of course the role of the incentive in a dynamic economy to the reordering of priority of values and it's relationship with social change.

I am not denying the importance of values as catalysts and directors of social change, but I would differ in saying that their utility comes after, not before, meeting the basics.

A reordering in the priority assigned by individuals, to values, is key to social change - all of it enabled if the appropriate incentive is effected in a dynamic economy ----- Consider, the value assigned to obtaining an education and the lack of opportunities in the economy -- with a high degree of predictability, we can say that in that milieu, an educated individual is more likely to develop attitudes and justifications for an orientation that see moral benefit in political and economic ideas that are posited as "just", even if "socializing"

Agreed, with the proviso stated above in their position in the pecking order.

I think you will just enjoy looking into it

I enjoy learning, no matter what the topic! :D
 
.
Dr Sabir Choudhry had recently assessed Pakistan with nukes, as a careless and mischievous child playing with a hand grenade in the middle of a crowded market place.

He couldn't have been more right.

Anyway, it is a pretty old article.
 
.
^^^
Actually M.J. Akbar summed up beautifully with the context inside India and Pakistan in The World is Flat ; I know it might have been take to the extreme but here it goes
A South Asian Muslim friend of mine once told me this story: His Indian Muslim family split in 1948, with half going to Pakistan and half staying in Mumbai. When he got older, he asked his father one day why the Indian half of the family seemed to be doing better than the Pakistani half. His father said to him, "Son, when a Muslim grows up in India and he sees a man living in a big mansion high on a hill, he says, 'Father, one day, I will be that man.' And when a Muslim grows up in Pakistan and sees a man living in a big mansion high on a hill, he says, 'Father, one day I will kill that man.'" When you have a pathway to be the Man or the Woman, you tend to focus on the path and on achieving your dreams. When you have no pathway, you tend to focus on your wrath and on nursing your memories.
 
.
^^^go to hell with your Indian philosophies.....
You are the enemy no.1 and we are aware of it...........
A boy playing with handgranade and so and so ... pakistan is not a boy and nukes are not granade. we have a very smart strategic think tank specialy for nukes. this propaganda is not quite working for the enemies of pakistan.
Pakistan had nukes before , we have it now .. and we will keep our nukes in the future (Insha-ALLAH)
 
.
^^^
Actually M.J. Akbar summed up beautifully with the context inside India and Pakistan in The World is Flat ; I know it might have been take to the extreme but here it goes

I love MJ Akbar's writings! He did an awesome job at The Asian Age, unfortunately for the newspaper things turned out the way they did. But good opinion pieces and editorials!
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom