DESERT FIGHTER
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2010
- Messages
- 46,973
- Reaction score
- 95
- Country
- Location
I never said that the Leo 2 was not built for combat. I said that Germany hasn't been involved in tank to tank or insurgent to tank fights in the past 50 years and they did not see need for blow off panels. Case in point, Leopard 2A7+ is rated as being much more dangerous to the crew than the M1.
Again who cares... Leopard is still a world class mbt without blow off panels... and in use with several armies...
More than 248 Arjun MK.I in service now, MK.II is undergoing trials. It is not 119.
I provided you sources...and u provide me with what?
I know people who have taken apart the armour of T-72 and Leopard 2 and examined thoroughly. One of the people I take my info from actually knows the composite armour composition of Leo 2A4. So, I'll take his words that T-72, T-80 and even T-90 side turret armour is at bare 60-70 mm minimum.
Good for you.
@DESERT FIGHTER, let's agree to disagree over the T-80UD and Al-Khalid comparison
Well, whatever I might say, Al-Khalid is still a competent tank and is a threat, a dangerous threat to our tanks.
It's not like I am trying to underrate the AK. It is a good tank.
But T-64 lineage will still rank above AK in my list.
I wont argue with you over it coz i have debunked several of your claims abt AKs transmission,era,ammo compartments,armour and its frontal armour or roof armour...
Last edited by a moderator: