What's new

A Big UTurn on Justice Qazi Faez Isa's Case Verdict || Details by Siddique Jaan

Qazi Faez`s charge sheet is Faiz a bad dharna in which General Faiz was named as main sponsors of Faiza bad dharna ,Same General holds DG ISI post also this 10 year ruling of establishment cant be done he be the SC CJP by 2022/2023
Nope
 
No they dont as they get housing and transport taken care of
Only salary is almost 8 lack a month ...then perks and privileges isskaa ilawaa...

Ex CJ Ifitkhar Chaudry hasn't return his bullet proof BMW yet.... mer jaan ko khatra ha...
 
Only salary is almost 8 lack a month ...then perks and privileges isskaa ilawaa...

Ex CJ Ifitkhar Chaudry hasn't return his bullet proof BMW yet.... mer jaan ko khatra ha...
Macao ki casinos mein konsa khatra hy?
 
in any other country in the world ‘money trail’ refers to the trail found by law agencies investigating the matter

Only in Pakistan can you be imprisoned based on the suspicion alone, and then be asked to prove a so-called ‘money trail’

Utter BS!

Country of your residence (i.e. UK) has laws where agencies (such as HMRC) don't need to prove anything, onus of providing money trail is solely on the owner of the property/asset! Read up on UK laws ... to think you were a mod here!!

Before you dispute this, kindly research otherwise I may have to embarrass you! Also you may want to consult a Conveyancing Solicitor in UK and check with them what all they now have to check on the deposit/buying funds of properties!!

Carrying £1000 cash would lead to confiscation until proof is provided that it is your cash (withdrawn from your bank account). £3000 cash deposit in a personal account gets you marked, repeat such deposits too often and it triggers an automatic investigation with a notice through your door!

In UK, they send a written notice to provide the tax paid 'money trail' for the undeclared asset/cash deposits and if you don't provide all paperwork, you get a court summon and a possible arrest prior to it depending on how big the amount is!

You are anti-army and Pro PMLN (hence pro this judge) but I guess being educated and raised in UK has little to no effect on such things!
 
Utter BS!

Country of your residence (i.e. UK) has laws where agencies (such as HMRC) don't need to prove anything, onus of providing money trail is solely on the owner of the property/asset! Read up on UK laws ... to think you were a mod here!!

Before you dispute this, kindly research otherwise I may have to embarrass you! Also you may want to consult a Conveyancing Solicitor in UK and check with them what all they now have to check on the deposit/buying funds of properties!!

Carrying £1000 cash would lead to confiscation until proof is provided that it is your cash (withdrawn from your bank account). £3000 cash deposit in a personal account gets you marked, repeat such deposits too often and it triggers an automatic investigation with a notice through your door!

In UK, they send a written notice to provide the tax paid 'money trail' for the undeclared asset/cash deposits and if you don't provide all paperwork, you get a court summon and a possible arrest prior to it depending on how big the amount is!

You are anti-army and Pro PMLN (hence pro this judge) but I guess being educated and raised in UK has little to no effect on such things!
Well said sir, I'm not that knowledgeable on Canadian tax laws or prosecution but I'm sure it is similar to UK.


A few months ago I had to withdraw $5000 from my account, the teller requested two pieces of id, inquired about purpose of th cash withdrawal and had to get approval from the branch manager, keep in mind this is my own halal earned money that I gave to bank for safe keeping. The level of regulation on banking transactions is next level in West as compared to Pakistan. Funnily the person you quoted is based in the UK but thinks every where the system runs like Pakistan.
 
Utter BS!

Country of your residence (i.e. UK) has laws where agencies (such as HMRC) don't need to prove anything, onus of providing money trail is solely on the owner of the property/asset! Read up on UK laws ... to think you were a mod here!!

Before you dispute this, kindly research otherwise I may have to embarrass you! Also you may want to consult a Conveyancing Solicitor in UK and check with them what all they now have to check on the deposit/buying funds of properties!!

Carrying £1000 cash would lead to confiscation until proof is provided that it is your cash (withdrawn from your bank account). £3000 cash deposit in a personal account gets you marked, repeat such deposits too often and it triggers an automatic investigation with a notice through your door!

In UK, they send a written notice to provide the tax paid 'money trail' for the undeclared asset/cash deposits and if you don't provide all paperwork, you get a court summon and a possible arrest prior to it depending on how big the amount is!

You are anti-army and Pro PMLN (hence pro this judge) but I guess being educated and raised in UK has little to no effect on such things!
Okay, I can admit to being wrong about something, I suppose on further reading money trail can be the other way around. Thanks for the explanation. I had only ever heard the specific terminology used in case of a crime being investigated and being provided by prosecution in attempting a conviction, and not for a party accused to disprove based on suspicion.
 
Qazi Faez`s charge sheet is Faiz a bad dharna in which General Faiz was named as main sponsors of Faiza bad dharna ,Same General holds DG ISI post also this 10 year ruling of establishment cant be done he be the SC CJP by 2022/2023
One of the factor you can say..... Hudabia paper mill a clean shot at Nawaz and Dar financial / money laundering list. I was surprised when 3 out of 7 judges decided to through the reference out of window.
 
One of the factor you can say..... Hudabia paper mill a clean shot at Nawaz and Dar financial / money laundering list. I was surprised when 3 out of 7 judges decided to through the reference out of window.
A new direction but still Qazi Faiz at CJP is a threat to many

All civil servants have to explain their assets he is no different
FOregin funding case a PM has to answer not hide behind stay
 
FOregin funding case a PM has to answer not hide behind stay
By all means courts should move ahead but with PMLN and PPP also getting stuck I dont think they have the same interest for it they had before they got involved
 
By all means courts should move ahead but with PMLN and PPP also getting stuck I dont think they have the same interest for it they had before they got involved
There is more to loose for PTI then other parties ,just like in Nab ordinance
 
There is more to loose for PTI then other parties ,just like in Nab ordinance
Not really after ppp and pmln uk were found to have some rather colourful investors but you keep on watching geo and dawn
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom